Dependence of equilibrium Griffith surface energy on crack speed in phase-field models for fracture coupled to elastodynamics

2017 ◽  
Vol 207 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaibhav Agrawal ◽  
Kaushik Dayal
1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Wheeler ◽  
G. B. McFadden

In this paper we present a new formulation of a large class of phase-field models, which describe solidification of a pure material and allow for both surface energy and interface kinetic anisotropy, in terms of the Hoffman–Cahn ξ-vector. The ξ-vector has previously been used in the context of sharp interface models, where it provides an elegant tool for the representation and analysis of interfaces with anisotropic surface energy. We show that the usual gradient-energy formulations of anisotropic phase-field models are expressed in a natural way in terms of the ξ-vector when appropriately interpreted. We use this new formulation of the phase-field equations to provide a concise derivation of the Gibbs–Thomson–Herring equation in the sharp-interface limit in three dimensions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 661-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harbir Antil ◽  
Sören Bartels

AbstractFractional differential operators provide an attractive mathematical tool to model effects with limited regularity properties. Particular examples are image processing and phase field models in which jumps across lower dimensional subsets and sharp transitions across interfaces are of interest. The numerical solution of corresponding model problems via a spectral method is analyzed. Its efficiency and features of the model problems are illustrated by numerical experiments.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhan Chen

AbstractIn this work, the existence of a global minimizer for the previous Lagrangian formulation of nonpolar solvation model proposed in [1] has been proved. One of the proofs involves a construction of a phase field model that converges to the Lagrangian formulation. Moreover, an Eulerian formulation of nonpolar solvation model is proposed and implemented under a similar parameterization scheme to that in [1]. By doing so, the connection, similarity and difference between the Eulerian formulation and its Lagrangian counterpart can be analyzed. It turns out that both of them have a great potential in solvation prediction for nonpolar molecules, while their decompositions of attractive and repulsive parts are different. That indicates a distinction between phase field models of solvation and our Eulerian formulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document