Bilateral effective tax rates and foreign direct investment

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 822-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Egger ◽  
Simon Loretz ◽  
Michael Pfaffermayr ◽  
Hannes Winner
2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 122-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Busakorn Chantasasawat ◽  
K. C. Fung ◽  
Hitomi Iizaka ◽  
Alan Siu

This paper attempts to determine empirically whether China is taking foreign direct investment (FDI) away from other Asian economies (the “China effect”). A random-effects simultaneous equation model, controlling for the determinants of inward FDI of eight East and Southeast Asian economies over 1985–2001 and using China's inward FDI as an indicator of the China effect, indicates that China's FDI level is positively related to these economies' FDI levels and negatively related to their shares in FDI in Asia. Moreover, openness, corporate tax rates, and corruption can exert a greater influence on these countries' FDI than China's FDI.


10.3846/142 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 9-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orinta Čegytė ◽  
Algita Miečinskienė

In global economy foreign capital flows from one country to another, and mostly from developed countries to less developed countries in order to take advantages of low rates of raw materials and wages, is an often phenomenon. Foreign direct investment is usually treated as important factor of economic growth. A separate part of this research includes the analysis of the factors influencing FDI flows in the countries. These factors are export, market capacity, tax rates, education level and the level of research and development. The research shows strong relation with all these determinants in Lithuania.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-61
Author(s):  
Setiadi Alim Lim

The inflow of Foreign Direct Investment is needed by all countries in the world tobe used as a catalyst to achieve the goals of sustainable development in allaspects of a country's life. Countries in the Southeast Asia Region that aremembers of ASEAN also need Foreign Direct Investment. The success of acountry in attracting Foreign Direct Investment inflows is determined by manyfactors, including the ease of doing business and the income tax rate. In thisstudy, a comparative study was conducted between the success of ASEANcountries in obtaining Foreign Direct Investment inflows with the success ofachieving a high index of ease of doing business and the use of competitiveincome tax rates. The comparison was only made between 10 ASEAN membercountries from 11 ASEAN member countries, because of the difficulty in collecting data from 1 other ASEAN member country, namely Timor Leste. The results showed that Singapore succeeded in attracting the largest Foreign DirectInvestment inflows among other ASEAN countries, amounting to 59.10% of thetotal Foreign Direct Investment inflows from ASEAN countries. Singapore'ssuccess in attracting the largest Foreign Direct Investment inflow among otherASEAN countries is directly proportional to its achievement in obtaining the bestease of doing business index and the lowest income tax rate compared to otherASEAN countries. Meanwhile, for other ASEAN countries, there is no visiblecomparison between the success of obtaining Foreign Direct Investment with theease of doing business index and the Income Tax rate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document