Randomized comparison of contact force-guided versus conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of electrical reconnections and clinical outcomes

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohki Nakamura ◽  
Shigeto Naito ◽  
Takehito Sasaki ◽  
Masahiro Nakano ◽  
Kentaro Minami ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Di Cori ◽  
L Segreti ◽  
G Zucchelli ◽  
S Viani ◽  
F Tarasco ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Contact force catheter ablation is the gold standard for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Local tissue impedance (LI) evaluation has been recently studied to evaluate lesion formation during radiofrequency ablation. Purpose Aim of the study was to assess the outcomes of an irrigated catether with LI alghorithm compared to contact force (CF)-sensing catheters in the treatment of symptomatic AF. Methods A prospective, single-center, nonrandomized study was conducted, to compare outcomes between CF-AF ablation (Group 1) and LI-AF ablation (Group 2). For Group 1 ablation was performed using the Carto 3© System with the SmartTouch SF catheter and, as ablation target, an ablation index value of 500 anterior and 400 posterior. For Group 2, ablation was performed using the Rhythmia™ System with novel ablation catheter with a dedicated algorithm (DirectSense) used to measure LI at the distal electrode of this catheter. An absolute impedance drop greater than 20Ω was used at each targeted. According to the Close Protocol, ablation included a point by point pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with an Inter-lesion space ≤5 mm in both Groups. Procedural endpoint was PVI, with confirmed bidirectional block. Results A total of 116 patients were enrolled, 59 patients in Group 1 (CF) and 57 in Group 2 (LI), 65 (63%) with a paroxismal AF and 36 (37%) with a persistent AF. Baseline patients features were not different between groups (P=ns). LI-Group showed a comparable procedural time (180±89 vs 180±56, P=0.59) but with a longer fluoroscopy time (20±12 vs 13±9 min, P=0.002). Wide antral isolation was more often observed in CF-Group (95% vs 80%, P=0.022), while LI-Group 2 required frequently additional right or left carina ablation (28% vs 14%, P=0.013). The mean LI was 106±14Ω prior to ablation and 92.5±11Ω after ablation (mean LI drop of 13.5±8Ω) during a median RF time of 26 [19–34] sec for each ablation spot. No steam pops or complications during the procedures were reported. The acute procedural success was 100%, with all PVs successfully isolated in all study patients. Regarding safety, only minor vascular complications were observed (5%), without differences between groups (p=0.97). During follow up, 9-month freedom from atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia recurrence was 86% in Group 1 and 75% in Group 2 (P=0.2). Conclusions An LI-guided PV ablation strategy seems to be safe and effective, with acute and mid-term outcomes comparable to the current contact force strategy. LI monitoring could be a promising complementary parameter to evaluate not only wall contact but also lesion formation during power delivery. Procedural Outcomes Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-319
Author(s):  
Alonso Pedrote ◽  
Eduardo Arana-Rueda ◽  
Lorena García-Riesco ◽  
Adriano Jiménez-Velasco ◽  
Juan Sánchez-Brotons ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Blendea ◽  
S Istratoaie ◽  
S Pop ◽  
M Mansour

Abstract Introduction The effect of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) on left atrial (LA) function has not been well defined. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate impact of ablation on parameters of global and regional LA function using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) Methods We studied 26 consecutive patients (age 56±10 years, 19 men) with paroxysmal AF using ICE before and immediately after circumferential PVI. All pulmonary veins were isolated in all patients. ICE measurements included LA fractional area shortening, peak A wave on transmitral Doppler flow, peak emptying velocity on the left atrial appendage (LAA) Doppler flow, as well as tissue Doppler myocardial velocities at the level of the posterior LA wall, interatrial septum, and lateral wall, which were used as parameters of regional LA function. Results The mean radiofrequency ablation time was 37±22min. Post ablation there was a significant reduction of the LA fractional area shortening from 27±8% to 22±6% (p<0.01). The tissue Doppler velocity of atrial contraction at the posterior wall decreased significantly post ablation: from 8.9±1.8 cm/s to 6.9±1.4 cm/s (p<0.01). There were no significant differences between the pre and post ablation values for tissue Doppler velocities at the level of the interatrial septum or LA lateral wall. The post ablation peak transmitral A wave and peak LAA Doppler velocities did not differ significantly from the pre ablation values. Conclusion In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, circumferential PVI results in an immediate decrease in LA function without a significant change in LAA function.


EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1197-1205
Author(s):  
Shu-Nan He ◽  
Ying Tian ◽  
Liang Shi ◽  
Yan-Jiang Wang ◽  
Bo-Qia Xie ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation can be effective as sole treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation. However, identifying those patients who will respond to this therapy remains a challenge. We investigated the clinical value of the sequential low-dose ibutilide test for identifying patients with persistent atrial fibrillation in whom pulmonary vein isolation is effective as sole therapy. Methods and results In a prospective cohort of 180 consecutive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, intravenous low-dose (0.004 mg/kg) ibutilide was administered 3 days before ablation and after the completion of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. In patients in whom ibutilide did not terminate atrial fibrillation pre-procedurally, but successfully terminated it intraprocedurally, no further atrial substrate modification was performed. Pre-procedural low-dose ibutilide failed to terminate the arrhythmia in all patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, while pulmonary vein isolation ± low-dose ibutilide terminated persistent atrial fibrillation in 55 (30.6%) of them (PsAF group 1). The remaining 125 (69.4%) patients underwent electrogram-based ablation (PsAF Group 2). The control group comprised 379 consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent pulmonary vein isolation over the same period. At 24 months follow-up, 39 (70.9%) patients in PsAF Group 1 and 276 (72.8%) patients in the control group were free from atrial tachyarrhythmias (P = NS); the arrhythmia-free rates in both groups were higher than that in PsAF group 2 (58.4%, P = 0.005). Conclusion The sequential low-dose ibutilide test is a simple method for identifying patients with persistent atrial fibrillation in whom pulmonary vein isolation alone is an appropriate treatment strategy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document