Identification of Individuals at Risk for Lynch Syndrome Using Targeted Evaluations and Genetic Testing: National Society of Genetic Counselors and the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Colorectal Cancer Joint Practice Guideline

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 484-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott M. Weissman ◽  
Randall Burt ◽  
James Church ◽  
Steve Erdman ◽  
Heather Hampel ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 544-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew B. Yurgelun ◽  
Rowena Mercado ◽  
Margery Rosenblatt ◽  
Monica Dandapani ◽  
Wendy Kohlmann ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (23) ◽  
pp. 3534-3542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry T. Lynch ◽  
C. Richard Boland ◽  
Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas ◽  
Christopher Amos ◽  
Jane F. Lynch ◽  
...  

Genetic testing is being adopted increasingly to identify individuals with germline mutations that predispose to hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. Deciding who to test and for which syndrome is of concern to members of the GI oncology community, molecular geneticists, and genetic counselors. The purpose of this review is to help provide guidelines for testing, given that the results influence syndrome diagnosis and clinical management. Although family history may determine whether testing is appropriate and may direct testing to the most informative family member, evolving clinicopathologic features can identify individual patients who warrant testing. Thus, although the usual absence of clinical premonitory signs in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (or Lynch syndrome) adds difficulty to its diagnosis, use of the Amsterdam Criteria and Bethesda Guidelines can prove helpful. In contrast, premonitory stigmata such as pigmentations in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and the phenotypic features of familial adenomatous polyposis aid significantly in syndrome diagnosis. We conclude that the physician's role in advising DNA testing is no small matter, given that a hereditary cancer syndrome's sequelae may be far reaching. Genetic counselors may be extremely helpful to the practicing gastroenterologist, oncologist, or surgeon; when more specialized knowledge is called for, referral can be made to a medical geneticist and/or a medical genetics clinic.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 738-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina Liu ◽  
Heather MacLeod ◽  
Gregory Webster ◽  
Elizabeth M. McNally ◽  
Suzanne M. O’Neill ◽  
...  

A significant portion of sudden death cases result from an underlying genetic etiology, which may be determined through postmortem genetic testing. The National Association of Medical Examiners (NAME) recommends that an appropriate postmortem sample is saved on all sudden death cases under the age of 40. Genetic counselors (GCs) play an important role in this process by working with medical examiners and coroners (ME/Cs) to recommend and interpret specific testing and to guide family members. A survey sent to the National Society of Genetic Counselors was designed and implemented to learn more about the experiences of genetic counselors who had considered or ordered postmortem genetic testing. Results showed that cardiovascular GCs were significantly more willing to recommend genetic testing in younger age decedents (ages 10, 18, 30, 40, and 50) compared to other specialty GCs ( p<0.05, Chi-square). Thirty-seven percent (7 of 19) of GCs reported insurance covering some portion of genetic testing. Participants also reported highest success for DNA extractions with fresh and frozen blood, reinforcing NAME recommendations for appropriate sample collection for postmortem genetic testing. Overall, participating GCs demonstrated a very good understanding for the appropriate use of postmortem genetic testing and did identify suspected barriers of cost and lack of insurance coverage as deterrents. With the rapid decrease in costs for diagnostic genetic testing, ME/C awareness of NAME recommendations for sample collection and storage remain important to facilitate postmortem genetic testing.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Ezzell Hunter ◽  
Kathleen A. Arnold ◽  
Jennifer E. Cook ◽  
Jamilyn Zepp ◽  
Marian J. Gilmore ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 161-167
Author(s):  
Molly Ford

AbstractGrowing knowledge of inherited colorectal cancer syndromes has led to better surveillance and better care of this subset of patients. The most well-known entities, including Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis, are continually being studied and with the advent of more sophisticated genetic testing, additional genetic discoveries have been made in the field of inherited cancer. This article will summarize many of the updates to both the familiar and perhaps less familiar syndromes that can lead to inherited or early-onset colorectal cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document