Membrane fouling and micro-pollutant removal of membrane bioreactor treating landfill leachate

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 715-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samunya Sanguanpak ◽  
Wilai Chiemchaisri ◽  
Chart Chiemchaisri
2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 398-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela C. B. Brito ◽  
Liséte C. Lange ◽  
Vera L. Santos ◽  
Míriam C. S. Amaral ◽  
Wagner G. Moravia

Abstract In this study, commercial baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) was employed as a novel inoculum for a membrane bioreactor (MBRy). It was applied to landfill leachate (LFL) treatment to remove recalcitrant organic compounds as well as for the assimilation of recalcitrant compounds, since yeasts have a high ability to break such compounds down. The MBR was inoculated with 10 g L−1 of commercial baker's yeast and was operated at a hydraulic retention time of 48 h and pH of 3.5. The specific air demand based on the membrane area (SADm) was maintained at 0.6 m3 h−1 m−2. The MBRy achieved chemical oxygen demand (COD), color, NH3, and humic substances removal of 68, 79, 68, and 50%, respectively. Furthermore, the MBRy showed lower fouling potential, which can be attributed to the low extracellular polymeric substances production, as the formation of a cake layer was the major mechanism of membrane fouling. The work demonstrated that novel MBR is a promising technology for treating recalcitrant landfill leachate.


Author(s):  
Gabrielle Maria Fonseca Pierangeli ◽  
Rodrigo Almeria Ragio ◽  
Roseli Frederigi Benassi ◽  
Gustavo Bueno Gregoracci ◽  
Eduardo Lucas Subtil

2014 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 1712-1719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangyuan Wang ◽  
Jianrong Chen ◽  
Huachang Hong ◽  
Aijun Wang ◽  
Hongjun Lin

Real sewage was continuously treated by a laboratory-scale anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactor (AnSMBR) for over 160 days. Results showed that around 90% of chemical oxygen demand, and 99% of turbidity and total suspended solids in the sewage could be removed by the AnSMBR system. Membrane flux sustained at 11 L/(m2 h) was realized with biogas sparging. Small flocs from sludge deflocculation in the early operational period caused a high membrane fouling rate, and the high specific filtration resistance of the cake layer appeared mostly attributable to the osmotic pressure effect. The performance results were also compared with those in the literature for upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors and aerobic membrane bioreactors for sewage treatment, demonstrating that AnSMBR could provide a desirable alternative for sewage treatment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 561-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samunya Sanguanpak ◽  
Chart Chiemchaisri ◽  
Wilai Chiemchaisri ◽  
Kazuo Yamamoto

Effect of membrane fouling on the removal of micro-pollutants from municipal solid waste landfill leachate, i.e. 4-methyl-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (BHT), bisphenol A (BPA), and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), in membrane bioreactor (MBR) was investigated. Modifications of membrane surface properties were analyzed to determine their relationship with their removals. Membrane fouling was simulated with foulants of different particle sizes on cellulose acetate (CA) microfiltration membrane to investigate the effect of foulant characteristics on BHT, BPA, and DEHP retention in the filtration experiment. The rejection efficiencies of the organic micro-pollutants in the MBR were 82–97% by fouled membrane, and 70–90% by cleaned membrane. The fouled membrane provided higher rejection of micro-pollutants from about 5% for BPA and BHT to 19% for DEHP. These improvements were due to the modification of membrane surface characteristics in terms of surface morphology, and contact angle after membrane fouling. The degree of rejection was found to be dependent upon the characteristics of foulant deposited on CA membrane surface. Increasing foulant particle size and its density shifted the mechanism of micro-pollutant rejection from membrane pore narrowing to pore blocking and cake formation while increasing pollutant adsorption capacity onto the foulant layer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Kong Linghan ◽  
Zhao Weidian ◽  
Ran Deqin ◽  
Hui Bing ◽  
Lu Linguo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document