The use of bibliometric and knowledge elicitation techniques to map a knowledge domain: Software Engineering in the 1990s

2005 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine W. McCain ◽  
June M. Verner ◽  
Gregory W. Hislop ◽  
William Evanco ◽  
Vera Cole
2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana-Marcela Vásquez-Bravo ◽  
Maria-Isabel Sánchez-Segura ◽  
Fuensanta Medina-Domínguez ◽  
Antonio Amescua

Knowledge elicitation process allows acquiring and transferring the knowledge. This process presents difficulties to select the appropriate elicitation technique. This paper presents a classification of the elicitation techniques used in software engineering and the relationship between the elicitation techniques and some elements of knowledge management as assets knowledge, epistemological dimension of knowledge and the knowledge creation phases. This classification provides a guideline to select a technique or a set of techniques for knowledge elicitation based on phases of Nonaka’s model.


Author(s):  
Julian S. Weitzenfeld ◽  
Thomas R. Riedl ◽  
Jared T. Freeman ◽  
Gary A. Klein ◽  
John Musa

Author(s):  
Diana-Marcela Vásquez-Bravo ◽  
Maria-Isabel Sánchez-Segura ◽  
Fuensanta Medina-Domínguez ◽  
Antonio Amescua

The knowledge elicitation process allows for the acquiring and transferring of knowledge. Actually, this process presents difficulties when selecting the appropriate elicitation technique. This chapter presents a classification of the elicitation techniques used in software engineering and the relationship between the elicitation techniques and some elements of knowledge management such as assets knowledge, epistemological dimension of knowledge and the knowledge creation phases. This classification provides a guideline to select a technique or a set of techniques for knowledge elicitation based on phases of Nonaka's model. Additionally, the chapter presents the use of product patterns in knowledge elicitation, and defines a product pattern as formal representation mechanism for each of the knowledge assets defined and presented in this chapter.


2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 195 ◽  
Author(s):  
José R. Hilera ◽  
Carmen Pagés ◽  
J. Javier Martínez ◽  
J. Antonio Gutiérrez ◽  
Luis De-Marcos

This paper describes a method to generate ontologies from glossaries of terms. The proposed method presupposes an evolutionary life cycle based on successive transformations of the original glossary that lead to products of intermediate knowledge representation (dictionary, taxonomy, and thesaurus). These products are characterized by an increase in semantic expressiveness in comparison to the product obtained in the previous transformation, with the ontology as the end product. Although this method has been applied to produce an ontology from the “IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology,” it could be applied to any glossary of any knowledge domain to generate an ontology that may be used to index or search for information resources and documents stored in libraries or on the Semantic Web.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie F. Reyna ◽  
David A. Broniatowski

Abstract Gilead et al. offer a thoughtful and much-needed treatment of abstraction. However, it fails to build on an extensive literature on abstraction, representational diversity, neurocognition, and psychopathology that provides important constraints and alternative evidence-based conceptions. We draw on conceptions in software engineering, socio-technical systems engineering, and a neurocognitive theory with abstract representations of gist at its core, fuzzy-trace theory.


1997 ◽  
Vol 144 (4) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
J.I. Siddiqi ◽  
C.R. Roast
Keyword(s):  

IEE Review ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 112
Author(s):  
Stuart Bennett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document