scholarly journals Endogenous testosterone density predicts unfavorable disease at final pathology in intermediate risk prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Benito Porcaro ◽  
Alessandro Tafuri ◽  
Andrea Panunzio ◽  
Riccardo Rizzetto ◽  
Nelia Amigoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Final Pathology ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen Density ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Tumor Load ◽  
Total Psa

Abstract Objective To test the hypothesis that endogenous testosterone (ET) density could be associated with tumor load (TL) in patients with intermediate risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods Endogenous testosterone density (ETD, ratio between ET and prostate volume [PV]), biopsy positive cores density (BPCD, the ratio between the number of positive cores and PV) and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD, ratio between total PSA and PV) were retrospectively evaluated on a prospectively collected data on 430 patients with IR PCa submitted to radical prostatectomy (RP). Tumor load (TL) was measured as the percentage of prostatic volume occupied by cancer at final pathology. Unfavorable disease (UD) was defined as tumor upgrading (ISUP grading group 4, 5) and/or upstaging (pT3a or 3b) in prostate specimens. Associations were assessed by the logistic regression and linear regression models. Results Overall, UD, which was detected in 122 out of 430 IR patients (28.4%), was predicted by BPCD (odd ratio, OR = 1.356; 95% CI 1.048–1.754; p = 0.020) with a sensitivity 98.4% and overall accuracy 71.9%. On multivariate analysis, BPCD was independently predicted by PSAD (regression coefficient, b = 1.549; 95% CI 0.936–2.162; p < 0.0001), ETD (b = 0.032; 95% CI 0.023–0.040; p < 0.0001) and TL (b = 0.009; 95% CI 0.005–0.014; p < 0.0001). As BPCD increased, ETD and ET levels increased accordingly, but patients with BPCD > 1.0%/mL had significantly lower ET levels. Conclusions As ETD increased, BPCD and TL increased, accordingly; furthermore, patients with lower ET levels were more likely to have occult UD. The influence of tumor load, and unfavorable disease on ET and ETD needs to be addressed by further studies.

scholarly journals Endogenous testosterone density as ratio of endogenous testosterone levels on prostate volume predicts tumor upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Benito Porcaro ◽  
Sebastian Gallina ◽  
Alberto Bianchi ◽  
Clara Cerrato ◽  
Alessandro Tafuri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Surgical Specimen ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen Density ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Tumor Load ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Objectives To evaluate preoperative endogenous testosterone (ET) density (ETD), defined as the ratio of ET on prostate volume, and tumor upgrading risk in low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods From November 2014 to December 2019, 172 low-risk patients had ET (nmol/L) measured. ETD, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and the ratio of percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC) to prostate volume (PV), defined as BPC density (BPCD), were evaluated. Associations with tumor upgrading in the surgical specimen were assessed by statistical methods. Results Overall, 121 patients (70.3%) had tumor upgrading, which was predicted by BPCD (odds ratio, OR = 4.640; 95% CI 1.903–11.316; p = 0.001; overall accuracy: 70.3%). On multivariate analysis, tumor upgrading and clinical density factors related to each other for BPCD being predicted by ETD (regression coefficient, b = 0.032; 95% CI 0.021–0.043; p < 0.0001), PSAD (b = 1.962; 95% CI 1.067–2.586; p < 0.0001) and tumor upgrading (b = 0.259; 95% CI 0.112–0.406; p = 0.001). According to the model, as BPCD increased, ETD and PSAD increased, but the increase was higher for upgraded cases who showed either higher tumor load but significantly lower mean levels of either ET or PSA. Conclusions As ETD increased, higher tumor loads were assessed; however, in upgraded patients, lower ET was also detected. ETD might stratify low-risk disease for tumor upgrading features.

Gleason score upgrade among 10,282 men who underwent surgery as initial treatment in 2010: A population-based study.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 72-72
Author(s):  
Hong Zhang ◽  
Edward M. Messing ◽  
Hamza Ahmed ◽  
Yuhchyau Chen
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Time Of Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer

72 Background: Active surveillance is now accepted initial management for men who have localized prostate cancer with low risk of disease progression. Many criteria have been used for patient identification, including Gleason score (GS) obtained from prostate biopsy. Because of concerns of sampling error, some have recommended repeated biopsy before committing to active surveillance. However, there is limited information about the risk of missing high grade disease using the current standard biopsy approach. This study seeks to compare GS difference from biopsy and surgery to provide an estimated rate of GS upgrade. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program was used to identify men with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage T1-2cN0M0 prostate cancer diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2010. Patients who underwent prostatectomy were selected for further analysis. Based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and GS, cases were divided into low (PSA <=10 and GS <=6) and intermediate (10<PSA<=20 or GS=7) risk groups. The rates of GS upgrade were reported for each group. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in categorical variables (e.g. age and race) between groups of GS upgrade and no change/downgrade. Results: A total of 10,282 men were evaluated, with 9.2% (n=942) having low-risk disease, and 90.8% (n=9340) having intermediate-risk disease. Among men with low-risk prostate cancer, 22.3% (n=210) had GS upgrade and 0.8% (n=8) had GS 8 disease. Among men with intermediate risk disease, 26.2% (n=2446) had GS upgrade and 2.3% (n=214) had GS 8 disease. There was no statistically significant difference in either age or race distribution among men who had GS upgrade versus no change or downgrade at the time of surgery. Conclusions: A substantial number of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients had GS upgrade at the time of surgery, but few had upgraded to GS 8 high risk disease. These observations suggest that repeat biopsy prior to active surveillance may not be necessary.

Prostate specific antigen five years following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer: An ablative procedure?

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 123-123
Author(s):  
Shaan Kataria ◽  
Harsha Koneru ◽  
Shan Guleria ◽  
Malika Danner ◽  
Marilyn Ayoob ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Total Testosterone ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Biochemical Relapse ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Psa Nadir

123 Background: Our previous work on early PSA kinetics following prostate SBRT showed that an initial rapid and then slow PSA decline may result in very low PSA nadirs. This retrospective study sought to evaluate the PSA nadir 5 years following SBRT for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: 65 low and 80 intermediate risk PCa patients were treated definitively with SBRT at Georgetown University Hospital between January 2008 and October 2011. All patients were treated to 35-37.5 Gy in 5 fractions delivered via the CyberKnife Radiosurgical System. Patients who received androgen deprivation therapy were excluded from this study. Pre- and post-treatment PSA and total testosterone levels were obtained during routine follow up visits. Biochemical relapse was defined as a PSA rise > 2 ng/mL above the nadir and analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method. The PSA nadir was defined as the lowest PSA value prior to biochemical relapse or as the lowest value recorded during follow up. Prostate ablation was defined as a PSA nadir < 0.2 ng/mL. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate relevant variables on the likelihood of achieving a PSA nadir < 0.2 ng/mL. Results: The median age at the start of SBRT was 72 years. These patients had a median prostate volume of 36 cc with a median 25% of total cores involved. At a median follow up of 5.8 years, 84% and 37% of patients achieved a PSA nadir ≤ 0.5 ng/mL and < 0.2 ng/mL, respectively. Five low and 8 intermediate risk patients experienced a biochemical relapse; those who did not experience a biochemical relapse, achieved a median PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL. There was no difference between the 5-year bRFS rate for low (96.6%) and intermediate risk (97.4%) patients and the median time to PSA nadir was 36 months. Initial PSA (p = 0.024) and a lower testosterone at the time of the PSA nadir (p = 0.049) were found to be significant predictors of achieving a PSA nadir < 0.2 ng/mL. Conclusions: SBRT for low and intermediate risk PCa is a convenient treatment option with low PSA nadirs and a high rate of early bRFS. Less than 40% of patients achieved an ablative PSA nadir. Thus, the role of further dose escalation is an area of active investigation.

Randomized Trial of a Hypofractionated Radiation Regimen for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (17) ◽  
pp. 1884-1890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles N. Catton ◽  
Himu Lukka ◽  
Chu-Shu Gu ◽  
Jarad M. Martin ◽  
Stéphane Supiot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Conventional Fractionation ◽  
Distant Failure ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer

Purpose Men with localized prostate cancer often are treated with external radiotherapy (RT) over 8 to 9 weeks. Hypofractionated RT is given over a shorter time with larger doses per treatment than standard RT. We hypothesized that hypofractionation versus conventional fractionation is similar in efficacy without increased toxicity. Patients and Methods We conducted a multicenter randomized noninferiority trial in intermediate-risk prostate cancer (T1 to 2a, Gleason score ≤ 6, and prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10.1 to 20 ng/mL; T2b to 2c, Gleason ≤ 6, and PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL; or T1 to 2, Gleason = 7, and PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL). Patients were allocated to conventional RT of 78 Gy in 39 fractions over 8 weeks or to hypofractionated RT of 60 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks. Androgen deprivation was not permitted with therapy. The primary outcome was biochemical-clinical failure (BCF) defined by any of the following: PSA failure (nadir + 2), hormonal intervention, clinical local or distant failure, or death as a result of prostate cancer. The noninferiority margin was 7.5% (hazard ratio, < 1.32). Results Median follow-up was 6.0 years. One hundred nine of 608 patients in the hypofractionated arm versus 117 of 598 in the standard arm experienced BCF. Most of the events were PSA failures. The 5-year BCF disease-free survival was 85% in both arms (hazard ratio [short v standard], 0.96; 90% CI, 0.77 to 1.2). Ten deaths as a result of prostate cancer occurred in the short arm and 12 in the standard arm. No significant differences were detected between arms for grade ≥ 3 late genitourinary and GI toxicity. Conclusion The hypofractionated RT regimen used in this trial was not inferior to conventional RT and was not associated with increased late toxicity. Hypofractionated RT is more convenient for patients and should be considered for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

scholarly journals A comparative study of radical prostatectomy and permanent seed brachytherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Taussky ◽  
Véronique Ouellet ◽  
Guila Delouya ◽  
Fred Saad
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Prostate Brachytherapy ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Preoperative Selection ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> We sought to compare the outcomes between radical prostatectomy (RP) and permanent seed prostate brachytherapy (PB) in patients with low- and low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer from a single tertiary care centre.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> Patients were selected from our institute’s internal database based on preoperative selection criteria from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines (2015) for low- and intermediate-risk patients. No patient had received any neo-adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy. The endpoint was biochemical recurrence (BCR) or any salvage treatment for both RP and PB at 48 ± 4 months after treatment. The biochemical relapse threshold was set at prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥0.5 ng/mL for PB and two PSA values of ≥0.2 ng/mL for RP. Patients from both treatment groups were compared using non-parametric tests. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine an association of treatment and pretreatment factors with a BCR at 48 months.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 575 patients were included in this study; 254 were treated with RP and 321 with PB. BCR was not different between both groups (p=0.84, Chi-square test), and occurred in 21.2% of patients treated with RP and in 20.6% with PB. Based on univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, younger age, higher percentage of positive biopsies, and initial PSA were predictive of BCR. Treatment modality was not predictive in either univariate (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64‒1.44; p=0.84) or multivariate (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.89‒2.30; p=0.14) analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Using closely related cutoff values for BCR, both RP and PB did not have significantly different outcomes at four years post-treatment. A longer followup may be necessary to detect a difference between treatments.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document