scholarly journals Short-Term Reservoir Optimization for Flood Mitigation under Meteorological and Hydrological Forecast Uncertainty

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1635-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Schwanenberg ◽  
Fernando Mainardi Fan ◽  
Steffi Naumann ◽  
Julio Issao Kuwajima ◽  
Rodolfo Alvarado Montero ◽  
...  
10.29007/cl7s ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gökçen Uysal ◽  
Aynur Şensoy ◽  
Dirk Schwanenberg ◽  
Rodolfo Alvarado Montero

The short-term, optimal management of storage reservoirs is challenging due to multiple objectives, i.e. hydropower, water supply or flood mitigation, and inherent uncertainties of forecasts for inflow and water demand. Model Predictive Control (MPC) provides an online solution for this management problem by combining a process model, forecasts and the formulation of objectives in an objective function and its solution by an optimization algorithm. This anticipatory management has many advantages, but may suffer from forecast uncertainty. In practice, there are several sources of forecast uncertainty, which can jeopardize control decisions. In this study, hindcast experiments integrating deterministic and probabilistic streamflows in a closed-loop mode of MPC are tested to mimic a real-time flood mitigation case. Probabilistic inflow forecasts in combination with multi-stage stochastic optimization model are used with tree-based reduction techniques. According to the results, tree-based MPC proposes less spillway discharges during a real-time control of a major flood case by incorporating longer the forecast horizon and consideration of forecast uncertainty in the decision process. On the other hand, energy generation is compared with deterministic method, and the results are promising to be used without compromising the energy production.


2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 3127-3137 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. D. Paiva ◽  
W. Collischonn ◽  
M. P. Bonnet ◽  
L. G. G. de Gonçalves

Abstract. Recent extreme events in the Amazon River basin and the vulnerability of local population motivate the development of hydrological forecast systems using process based models for this region. In this direction, the knowledge of the source of errors in hydrological forecast systems may guide the choice on improving model structure, model forcings or developing data assimilation systems for estimation of initial model states. We evaluate the relative importance of hydrologic initial conditions and model meteorological forcings errors (precipitation) as sources of stream flow forecast uncertainty in the Amazon River basin. We used a hindcast approach that compares Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) and a reverse Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (reverse-ESP). Simulations were performed using the physically-based and distributed hydrological model MGB-IPH, comprising surface energy and water balance, soil water, river and floodplain hydrodynamics processes. The model was forced using TRMM 3B42 precipitation estimates. Results show that uncertainty on initial conditions plays an important role for discharge predictability, even for large lead times (∼1 to 3 months) on main Amazonian Rivers. Initial conditions of surface waters state variables are the major source of hydrological forecast uncertainty, mainly in rivers with low slope and large floodplains. Initial conditions of groundwater state variables are important, mostly during low flow period and in the southeast part of the Amazon where lithology and the strong rainfall seasonality with a marked dry season may be the explaining factors. Analyses indicate that hydrological forecasts based on a hydrological model forced with historical meteorological data and optimal initial conditions may be feasible. Also, development of data assimilation methods is encouraged for this region.


1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1493-1499 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.P. Douglas ◽  
A.M. Breipohl ◽  
F.N. Lee ◽  
R. Adapa

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaehee Lee ◽  
Jinyeong Lee ◽  
Young-Min Wi ◽  
Sung-Kwan Joo

Occasionally, wind curtailments may be required to avoid an oversupply when wind power, together with the minimum conventional generation, exceed load. By curtailing wind power, the forecast uncertainty and short-term variations in wind power can be mitigated so that a lower spinning reserve is sufficient to maintain the operational security of a power system. Additionally, the electric vehicle (EV) charging load can relieve the oversupply of wind power generation and avoid uneconomical wind power curtailments. This paper presents a stochastic generation scheduling method to ensure the operation security against wind power variation as well as against forecast uncertainty considering the stochastic EV charging load. In the paper, the short-term variations of wind power that are mitigated by the wind curtailment are investigated, and incorporated into a generation scheduling problem as the mixed-integer program (MIP) forms. Numerical results are also presented in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.


2011 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl-Heinz Tödter

SummaryThe statistical overhang (carry-over effect) is the contribution of the previous year to growth in the current year. Practitioners use the statistical overhang routinely to pin down and rationalize short-term forecasts. This article analyses the statistical overhang ‘statistically’ and quantifies its effect on forecast uncertainty. For quarterly data, knowing the statistical overhang at the end of the previous year reduces forecast uncertainty for annual growth in the current year to 68 percent. With monthly data, relative forecast uncertainty reduces to 56 percent. Against the background of the recent financial and economic crisis the analytical results are confronted with empirical forecasts. For ex post mean value forecasts the reduction of forecast uncertainty is broadly in line with the theoretical profile. With regard to the ex ante Bundesbank and Consensus forecasts, the decline of forecast uncertainty is somewhat slower than expected on the basis of information about the carry-over effect.


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 3739-3760 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. D. Paiva ◽  
W. Collischonn ◽  
M. P. Bonnet ◽  
L. G. G. Gonçalves

Abstract. Recent extreme events in the Amazon River basin and the vulnerability of local population motivate the development of hydrological forecast systems (HFSs) using process based models for this region. In this direction, the knowledge of the source of errors in HFSs may guide the choice on improving model structure, model forcings or developing data assimilation (DA) systems for estimation of initial model states. We evaluate the relative importance of hydrologic initial conditions (ICs) and model meteorological forcings (MFs) errors (precisely precipitation) as sources of stream flow forecast uncertainty in the Amazon River basin. We used a hindcast approach developed by Wood and Lettenmaier (2008) that contrasts Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) and a reverse Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (reverse-ESP). Simulations were performed using the physically-based and distributed hydrological model MGB-IPH, comprising surface energy and water balance, soil water, river and floodplain hydrodynamics processes. Model was forced using TRMM 3B42 precipitation estimates. Results show that uncertainty on initial conditions play an important role for discharge predictability even for large lead times (~1 to 3 months) on main Amazonian Rivers. ICs of surface waters state variables are the major source of hydrological forecast uncertainty, mainly in rivers with low slope and large floodplains. ICs of groundwater state variables are important mostly during low flow period and southeast part of the Amazon, where lithology and the strong rainfall seasonality with a marked dry season may be the explaining factors. Analyses indicate that hydrological forecasts based on a hydrological model forced with historical meteorological data and optimal initial conditions, may be feasible. Also, development of DA methods is encouraged for this region.


2021 ◽  
pp. 126798
Author(s):  
James C. Bennett ◽  
David.E. Robertson ◽  
Quan J Wang ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
Jean-Michel Perraud

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document