Comparison of single extraction procedures and the application of an index for the assessment of heavy metal bioavailability in river sediments

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 21485-21500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanja Sakan ◽  
Aleksandar Popović ◽  
Sandra Škrivanj ◽  
Nenad Sakan ◽  
Dragana Đorđević
2020 ◽  
Vol 726 ◽  
pp. 138670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Peralta ◽  
Gustavo Pérez ◽  
Gerardo Ojeda ◽  
Josep Maria Alcañiz ◽  
Manuel Valiente ◽  
...  

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1411
Author(s):  
Sanja Sakan ◽  
Stanislav Frančišković-Bilinski ◽  
Dragana Đorđević ◽  
Aleksandar Popović ◽  
Nenad Sakan ◽  
...  

In this manuscript, samples of Kupa River sediments were examined using three different extraction agents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of single extraction procedures to investigate the bioavailability and mobility of major and trace elements (Al, As, Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Pb, S, Si, Sr, Ti, V, and Zn) from river sediment. Two forms of studied elements were evaluated: mobile, the most toxic element form (extraction with 1 M CH3COONH4 and 0.01 M CaCl2) and potentially mobilized form (2 M HNO3 extraction). The estimation of the ecological risk, with the application of the probability distribution of RI (potential ecological risk index) values, is yielded with the help of the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). Ammonium acetate is proved to be a better extraction agent than calcium chloride. A positive correlation between the content of all extracted elements with nitric acid and the total element content indicates that 2 M HNO3 efficiently extracts all studied elements. Results showed anthropogenic sources of cadmium and copper and high barium mobility. The MCS suggests that risk of Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn was low; As and Cd posed a lower and median ecological risk in the studied areas.


Author(s):  
Yujuan Gao ◽  
Jianli Jia ◽  
Beidou Xi ◽  
Dongyu Cui ◽  
Wenbing Tan

The heavy metal pollution induced by agricultural land use change has attracted great attention. In this study, the divergent response of bioavailability of heavy metals in rhizosphere soil to different...


2001 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARCIA DE MELO FARIA ◽  
BRAZ A. SANCHEZ

Geochemical and clay mineralogical studies of bottom sediments collected along the Macacu and Caceribu rivers and Guanabara Bay were carried out in order to investigate the relationship between major source areas and recent sediments of the bay. Clay mineralogy includes different groups with selective distribution conditioned by geomorphic features and depositional settings. Micaceous clay minerals are abundant near parent rock in the upper course, whereas kaolinite derived from varied sources is gradually concentrated towards the estuary. In the Guanabara Bay, kaolinite accumulates near river mouths, while micaceous clay minerals are converted into mixed layers in the estuary. Analyses of heavy metal contents reveal higher levels of Zn and Cu in sediments of the bay than in river sediments. Profiles along rivers indicate a downstream decrease of heavy metals, whereas in the bay geochemical trends display greater variations. In general river mouth sediments present the lowest concentrations. At the north and east of Paquetá Island anomalous areas with the highest heavy metal contents occur. Cu tends to concentrate in < 2mum grain-size fraction and indicates an association with micaceous clay minerals in the upper river course. However, Cu retention seems to be further controlled by other components of bottom sediments due to changes in physical and chemical conditions of the estuarine environment. Zn shows unstable behavior along the rivers and concentrates in the bay. Pb displays small variations from river to bay sediments, and accumulates mainly in the < 63mum grain-size fraction without any association with clay mineral. Geoaccumulation indexes of Cu, Pb and Zn classify the study area as unpolluted in both studied rivers and in the NE sector of the bay, though the enrichment factors are higher in the bay. The study does not indicate those rivers as major sources of heavy metal pollution to the bay.


2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 2200-2224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Hsun Hsiao ◽  
Kuo Hui Bao ◽  
Shih Hui Wang ◽  
Zeng Yei Hseu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document