Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Young Schema Questionnaire (Short Form) in Chinese Undergraduate Students

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 645-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lixia Cui ◽  
Wenwen Lin ◽  
Tian P. S. Oei
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Young Schema Questionnaire ◽  
Schema Questionnaire

Psychometric Properties of the Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form-3: Factor Structure and Validity

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay M. Anmuth ◽  
Jim A. Haugh ◽  
Jenny L. Delorme
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Young Schema Questionnaire ◽  
Schema Questionnaire

Psychometric Properties of the French Version of the Young Schema Questionnaire - Short Form 3 (YSQ–S3)

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine Bouvard ◽  
Anne Denis ◽  
Jean Luc Roulin
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Clinical Sample ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
French Version ◽  
Young Schema Questionnaire ◽  
Exploratory Factor Analyses ◽  
Schema Questionnaire

AbstractThe purpose was to assess the psychometric properties of the French version of the Young Schema Questionnaire - Short Form 3 (YSQ–S3). The main non-clinical sample (N = 605, M = 20.63, 78% women) was divided into two subsamples: One was used for exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and the other was used for confirmatory analyses. Next, internal consistency, convergent validity and criterion-related validity were studied. The EFA to each of the five domains was similar to the theoretical structure postulated by Young. The confirmatory analysis of each of the five domains appeared to favor our solution over a single-factor solution and Young’s solution. The confirmatory factor analyses of high-order structures did not give fully satisfactory results but appeared to favor our solution (RMSEA =.11, CFI =.76, TLI =.71, SRMR =.07, AIC = 58,566.44). In our best model, the reliability (> .70) was satisfactory for fourteen schemas. The relationships between the schemas and the neuroticism, extraversion and psychoticism scores went in the expected directions. Detrimental parental rearing behaviors were linked to high scores for the various schemas. Lastly, 4 schemas differentiated between the clinical and non-clinical groups. In conclusion, the overall psychometric qualities of the French version of the YSQ–S3 allow its use in clinical populations.

Factor structure and internal consistency of the Young Schema Questionnaire (Short Form) in Korean and Australian samples

2006 ◽  
Vol 93 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Baranoff ◽  
Tian P.S. Oei ◽  
Seong Ho Cho ◽  
Seok-Man Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Young Schema Questionnaire ◽  
Schema Questionnaire

The reliability and factor structure of Thai Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form 3

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaiyun Sakulsriprasert ◽  
Darunee Phukao ◽  
Suree Kanjanawong ◽  
Natthani Meemon
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Young Schema Questionnaire ◽  
Schema Questionnaire

The Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Resiliency Scale in Chinese Undergraduates

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lixia Cui ◽  
Xiujie Teng ◽  
Xupei Li ◽  
Tian P.S. Oei
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Criterion Variable ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
High Level ◽  
Chinese Undergraduates

The current study examined the factor structure and the psychometric properties of Sandra Prince-Embury’s Resiliency Scale for Adolescents (RESA) in Chinese undergraduates. A total of 726 undergraduate students were randomly divided into two subsamples: Sample A was used for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Sample B was used for the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The EFA revealed that 56 items and a model of 10 factors with 3 higher order factors (as described by Sandra) were to be retained; CFA with Sample B confirmed this result. The overall scale and the subscales of the Chinese-RESA demonstrated a high level of internal consistency. Furthermore, concurrent validity was demonstrated by the correlation of the scale with other instruments such as the PANAS and the CSS, and the predictive validity was confirmed via three multiple regression analyses using the PANAS as a criterion variable: one for the 10 subscales of the C-RESA, one for the 3 higher order scales, and one for the total C-RESA. We concluded that the C-RESA may be used for research into Chinese undergraduates’ adaptive behaviors.

Italian Version of Young Schema Questionnaire Short Form 3--90-item

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Aloi ◽  
Marianna Rania ◽  
Raffaella Sacco ◽  
Barbara Basile ◽  
Cristina Segura-Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Italian Version ◽  
Young Schema Questionnaire ◽  
Schema Questionnaire

scholarly journals Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Fertility Problem Inventory–Short Form

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 205510291773865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Clelia Zurlo ◽  
Maria Franscesca Cattaneo Della Volta ◽  
Federica Vallone
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Fertility Problem

scholarly journals Reliability and Validity of the Korean Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form-3 in Medical Students

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Jae Lee ◽  
Young Hee Choi ◽  
Hyo Deog Rim ◽  
Seung Hee Won ◽  
Dong-Woo Lee
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Young Schema Questionnaire ◽  
Schema Questionnaire

Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Index of Teaching Stress—Short Form (ITS—SF)

2015 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 763-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Cleliazurlo ◽  
Daniela Pes ◽  
Rosaria Romano
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Teacher Stress ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Original Version ◽  
Short Version ◽  
Italian Version ◽  
Reliable Measure ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

WITHDRAWAL NOTICE for Cleliazurlo, M., Pes, D., & Romano, R. (2015). Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Index of Teaching Stress— Short Form (ITS—SF). Psychological Reports, 117(3), 763–780. DOI: 10.2466/ 08.PR0.117c24z5 The article has been withdrawn at the request of the author. The author contacted the journal to inform them that PARS, the rightsholder of the Index of Teaching Stress (“ITS”), expressed concern at the author’s unauthorized creation and publication of a short form version of the ITS. Although the author had received permission to validate an Italian version of ITS, the rights holder did not permit the development and publication of the resulting short form, and requested the article be withdrawn from access. If you have any questions about this, please contact SAGE. This study analyses factor structure and psychometric properties of the Italian short version of the Index of Teaching Stress–Short Form (ITS–SF). The original version of the ITS (90 items) was submitted to 567 teachers randomly drawn from a cross-section of school levels. Confirmatory factor analysis to check the factor structure was unsatisfactory, and Cronbach's α (.98) indicated a redundancy of items. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted for each section of the test and cross-loading items were eliminated. The resulting ITS–SF consists of 43 items, tapping eight meaningful and adequately reliable dimensions substantially corresponding to all dimensions measured by the original version of the ITS. The Italian short version of the Index of Teaching Stress constitutes a reliable measure of teacher stress in educative interactions.

Reliability of the Arabic version of the Young Schema Questionnaire - Short Form among orphanage residents

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Khater ◽  
Abdel-Hady El-Gilany ◽  
Mona El-Belsha ◽  
Azza Abdel-Moneim
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Arabic Version ◽  
Young Schema Questionnaire ◽  
Schema Questionnaire
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document