scholarly journals Development and Psychometric Evaluation of an Item Bank for Computerized Adaptive Testing of the EORTC Insomnia Dimension in Cancer Patients (EORTC CAT-SL)

Author(s):  
Linda Dirven ◽  
◽  
Morten Aa. Petersen ◽  
Neil K. Aaronson ◽  
Wei-Chu Chie ◽  
...  

AbstractTo further advance assessment of patient-reported outcomes, the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group has developed computerized adaptive test (CAT) versions of all EORTC Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) scales/items. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate an item bank for CAT measurement of insomnia (CAT-SL). In line with the EORTC guidelines, the developmental process comprised four phases: (I) defining the concept insomnia and literature search, (II) selection and formulation of new items, (III) pre-testing and (IV) field-testing, including psychometric analyses of the final item bank. In phase I, the literature search identified 155 items that were compatible with our conceptualisation of insomnia, including both quantity and quality of sleep. In phase II, following a multistep-approach, this number was reduced to 15 candidate items. Pre-testing of these items in cancer patients (phase III) resulted in an item list of 14 items, which were field-tested among 1094 patients in phase IV. Psychometric evaluations showed that eight items could be retained in a unidimensional model. The final item bank yielded greater measurement precision than the original QLQ-C30 insomnia item. It was estimated that administering two or more items from the insomnia item bank with CAT results in a saving in sample size between approximately 15–25%. The 8-item EORTC CAT-SL item bank facilitates precise and efficient measurement of insomnia as part of the EORTC CAT system of health-related quality life assessment in both clinical research and practice.

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Dirven ◽  
Martin JB Taphoorn ◽  
Mogens Groenvold ◽  
Esther JJ Habets ◽  
Neil K Aaronson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group is developing computerized adaptive testing (CAT) versions of each scale of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). This study aims to develop an item bank for the EORTC QLQ-C30 cognitive functioning scale, which can be used for CAT. Methods The complete developmental approach comprised four phases: (I) conceptualization and literature search, (II) operationalization, (III) pretesting, and (IV) field-testing. This paper describes phases I–III. I) A literature search was performed to identify self-report instruments and items measuring cognitive complaints on concentration and memory. II) A multistep item-selection procedure was applied to select and generate items that were relevant and compatible with the ‘QLQ-C30 item style.’ III) Cancer patients from different countries evaluated the item list for wording (ie, whether items were difficult, confusing, annoying, upsetting or intrusive), and whether relevant issues were missing. Results A list of 439 items was generated by the literature search. In the multistep item-selection procedure, these items were evaluated for relevance, redundancy, clarity, and response format, resulting in an list of 45 items. A total of 32 patients evaluated this item list in the pretesting phase, resulting in a preliminary list of 44 items. Conclusion Phase I–III resulted in an item list of 44 items measuring self-reported cognitive complaints that was endorsed by international experts and cancer patients in several countries. This list will be evaluated for its psychometric characteristics in phase IV.


2013 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 255-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Ignacio Arraras ◽  
Javier Suárez ◽  
Fernando Arias-de-la-Vega ◽  
Ruth Vera ◽  
Berta Ibáñez ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. S160
Author(s):  
S. Perez-Luque ◽  
J. Cacicedo ◽  
L. Delgado Arroniz ◽  
J.M. Praena-Fernandez ◽  
E. Montero ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 664-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Ignacio Arraras Urdaniz ◽  
Ruth Vera García ◽  
Maite Martínez Aguillo ◽  
Ana Manterola Burgaleta ◽  
Fernando Arias de la Vega ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document