Moment tensor inversion for focal mechanism of the Beibuwan earthquakes

1999 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 609-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong-Mao Zhou ◽  
Yun-Tai Chen ◽  
Zhong-Liang Wu
1991 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuyuan Liu ◽  
Robert. B. Herrmarnn ◽  
Jiakang Xie ◽  
E. Cranswick

Abstract Waveforms of the direct P-, SV- and SH-waves of five 1983 Goodnow, New York, aftershocks (mb = 1.4–3.1), locally recorded at four hard-rock sites (epicentral distances=1.9–8.0 km) with GEOS systems, were studied to obtain their focal mechanism solutions by waveform fit using both systematic search and moment tensor inversion. Both synthetic and observed data were low-pass filtered at 10 Hz to reduce sensitivity to shallow earth structure. It was discovered that only the first cycle of P-wave and S-wave appear to have pure direct body wave characteristics. The strong P- and S-coda have no stable polarization. The five aftershocks have similar locations, identical P-first motions, but varying direct S-waveforms. A layered velocity model with a P-wave velocity of 4.4 km/s in the surface layer was derived. Fault plane solutions of four events indicate reverse faulting mechanisms that have a near horizontal P-axis with a strike of ENE. This is similar to the fault plane solution of the mainshock (October 7, 1983, mb = 5.1) and the composite focal mechanism of the aftershocks. Four aftershocks occurred on the fault planes with the strike NW-N and dip of 52°–64° toward NE-E. The fifth event studied has significant strike-slip motion with the P axis is also nearly horizontal and oriented NE. The results of systematic search technique agree well with those of moment tensor inversion. The first motion directions, pulse widths, amplitudes, amplitude ratios and arrival times of the direct P-, SV- and SH-phases of the synthetic seismograms are consistent with those of the observed seismograms. The results of the research demonstrated that the S-wave amplitude can provide important constraints on the focal mechanism.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 177-193
Author(s):  
Yuyang Tan ◽  
◽  
Haijiang Zhang ◽  
Junlun Li ◽  
Chen Yin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hijrah Saputra ◽  
Wahyudi Wahyudi ◽  
Iman Suardi ◽  
Ade Anggraini ◽  
Wiwit Suryanto

AbstractThis study comprehensively investigates the source mechanisms associated with the mainshock and aftershocks of the Mw = 6.3 Yogyakarta earthquake which occurred on May 27, 2006. The process involved using moment tensor inversion to determine the fault plane parameters and joint inversion which were further applied to understand the spatial and temporal slip distributions during the earthquake. Moreover, coseismal slip distribution was overlaid with the relocated aftershock distribution to determine the stress field variations around the tectonic area. Meanwhile, the moment tensor inversion made use of near-field data and its Green’s function was calculated using the extended reflectivity method while the joint inversion used near-field and teleseismic body wave data which were computed using the Kikuchi and Kanamori methods. These data were filtered through a trial-and-error method using a bandpass filter with frequency pairs and velocity models from several previous studies. Furthermore, the Akaike Bayesian Information Criterion (ABIC) method was applied to obtain more stable inversion results and different fault types were discovered. Strike–slip and dip-normal were recorded for the mainshock and similar types were recorded for the 8th aftershock while the 9th and 16th June were strike slips. However, the fault slip distribution from the joint inversion showed two asperities. The maximum slip was 0.78 m with the first asperity observed at 10 km south/north of the mainshock hypocenter. The source parameters discovered include total seismic moment M0 = 0.4311E + 19 (Nm) or Mw = 6.4 with a depth of 12 km and a duration of 28 s. The slip distribution overlaid with the aftershock distribution showed the tendency of the aftershock to occur around the asperities zone while a normal oblique focus mechanism was found using the joint inversion.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gene Aaron Ichinose ◽  
Sean Ricardo Ford ◽  
Robert J. Mellors

2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 636-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Hagos ◽  
H. Shomali ◽  
B. Lund ◽  
R. Bothvarsson ◽  
R. Roberts

2016 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 964-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Kwiatek ◽  
Patricia Martínez‐Garzón ◽  
Marco Bohnhoff

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document