Deep learning image reconstruction for improvement of image quality of abdominal computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasutaka Ichikawa ◽  
Yoshinori Kanii ◽  
Akio Yamazaki ◽  
Naoki Nagasawa ◽  
Motonori Nagata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Abdominal Computed Tomography ◽  
Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction

scholarly journals Improved image quality in abdominal computed tomography reconstructed with a novel Deep Learning Image Reconstruction technique – initial clinical experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 205846012110083
Author(s):  
Tormund Njølstad ◽  
Anselm Schulz ◽  
Johannes C Godt ◽  
Helga M Brøgger ◽  
Cathrine K Johansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Slice Thickness ◽  
Visual Grading ◽  
Abdominal Computed Tomography

Background A novel Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) technique for computed tomography has recently received clinical approval. Purpose To assess image quality in abdominal computed tomography reconstructed with DLIR, and compare with standardly applied iterative reconstruction. Material and methods Ten abdominal computed tomography scans were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction and DLIR of medium and high strength, with 0.625 mm and 2.5 mm slice thickness. Image quality was assessed using eight visual grading criteria in a side-by-side comparative setting. All series were presented twice to evaluate intraobserver agreement. Reader scores were compared using univariate logistic regression. Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated for quantitative analyses. Results For 2.5 mm slice thickness, DLIR images were more frequently perceived as equal or better than iterative reconstruction across all visual grading criteria (for both DLIR of medium and high strength, p < 0.001). Correspondingly, DLIR images were more frequently perceived as better (as opposed to equal or in favor of iterative reconstruction) for visual reproduction of liver parenchyma, intrahepatic vascular structures as well as overall impression of image noise and texture (p < 0.001). This improved image quality was also observed for 0.625 mm slice images reconstructed with DLIR of high strength when directly comparing to traditional iterative reconstruction in 2.5 mm slices. Image noise was significantly lower and contrast-to-noise ratio measurements significantly higher for images reconstructed with DLIR compared to iterative reconstruction (p < 0.01). Conclusions Abdominal computed tomography images reconstructed using a DLIR technique shows improved image quality when compared to standardly applied iterative reconstruction across a variety of clinical image quality criteria.

scholarly journals Deep learning–based reconstruction may improve non-contrast cerebral CT imaging compared to other current reconstruction algorithms

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luuk J. Oostveen ◽  
Frederick J. A. Meijer ◽  
Frank de Lange ◽  
Ewoud J. Smit ◽  
Sjoert A. Pegge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
White Matter ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Quality Characteristics ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Contrast Ct ◽  
Lower Noise ◽  
Reconstruction Time

Abstract Objectives To evaluate image quality and reconstruction times of a commercial deep learning reconstruction algorithm (DLR) compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction (Hybrid-IR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms for cerebral non-contrast CT (NCCT). Methods Cerebral NCCT acquisitions of 50 consecutive patients were reconstructed using DLR, Hybrid-IR and MBIR with a clinical CT system. Image quality, in terms of six subjective characteristics (noise, sharpness, grey-white matter differentiation, artefacts, natural appearance and overall image quality), was scored by five observers. As objective metrics of image quality, the noise magnitude and signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) of the grey and white matter were calculated. Mean values for the image quality characteristics scored by the observers were estimated using a general linear model to account for multiple readers. The estimated means for the reconstruction methods were pairwise compared. Calculated measures were compared using paired t tests. Results For all image quality characteristics, DLR images were scored significantly higher than MBIR images. Compared to Hybrid-IR, perceived noise and grey-white matter differentiation were better with DLR, while no difference was detected for other image quality characteristics. Noise magnitude was lower for DLR compared to Hybrid-IR and MBIR (5.6, 6.4 and 6.2, respectively) and SDNR higher (2.4, 1.9 and 2.0, respectively). Reconstruction times were 27 s, 44 s and 176 s for Hybrid-IR, DLR and MBIR respectively. Conclusions With a slight increase in reconstruction time, DLR results in lower noise and improved tissue differentiation compared to Hybrid-IR. Image quality of MBIR is significantly lower compared to DLR with much longer reconstruction times. Key Points • Deep learning reconstruction of cerebral non-contrast CT results in lower noise and improved tissue differentiation compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction. • Deep learning reconstruction of cerebral non-contrast CT results in better image quality in all aspects evaluated compared to model-based iterative reconstruction. • Deep learning reconstruction only needs a slight increase in reconstruction time compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction, while model-based iterative reconstruction requires considerably longer processing time.

Low-dose whole-body CT using deep learning image reconstruction: image quality and lesion detection

2021 ◽  
Vol 94 (1121) ◽  
pp. 20201329
Author(s):  
Yoshifumi Noda ◽  
Tetsuro Kaga ◽  
Nobuyuki Kawai ◽  
Toshiharu Miyoshi ◽  
Hiroshi Kawada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Lesion Detection ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Whole Body Ct ◽  
Attenuation Values

Objectives: To evaluate image quality and lesion detection capabilities of low-dose (LD) portal venous phase whole-body computed tomography (CT) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR). Methods: The study cohort of 59 consecutive patients (mean age, 67.2 years) who underwent whole-body LD CT and a prior standard-dose (SD) CT reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (SD-IR) within one year for surveillance of malignancy were assessed. The LD CT images were reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction of 40% (LD-IR) and DLIR (LD-DLIR). The radiologists independently evaluated image quality (5-point scale) and lesion detection. Attenuation values in Hounsfield units (HU) of the liver, pancreas, spleen, abdominal aorta, and portal vein; the background noise and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver, pancreas, and spleen were calculated. Qualitative and quantitative parameters were compared between the SD-IR, LD-IR, and LD-DLIR images. The CT dose-index volumes (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were compared between SD and LD scans. Results: The image quality and lesion detection rate of the LD-DLIR was comparable to the SD-IR. The image quality was significantly better in SD-IR than in LD-IR (p < 0.017). The attenuation values of all anatomical structures were comparable between the SD-IR and LD-DLIR (p = 0.28–0.96). However, background noise was significantly lower in the LD-DLIR (p < 0.001) and resulted in improved SNRs (p < 0.001) compared to the SD-IR and LD-IR images. The mean CTDIvol and DLP were significantly lower in the LD (2.9 mGy and 216.2 mGy•cm) than in the SD (13.5 mGy and 1011.6 mGy•cm) (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: LD CT images reconstructed with DLIR enable radiation dose reduction of >75% while maintaining image quality and lesion detection rate and superior SNR in comparison to SD-IR. Advances in knowledge: Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm enables around 80% reduction in radiation dose while maintaining the image quality and lesion detection compared to standard-dose whole-body CT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document