Lymphovascular Invasion as the Major Prognostic Factor in Node-Negative Esophageal Cancer After Primary Esophagectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1459-1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chung-Ping Hsu ◽  
Cheng-Yen Chuang ◽  
Po-Kuei Hsu ◽  
Ling-I Chien ◽  
Chih-Hung Lin ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Oguma ◽  
S Ozawa ◽  
A Kazuno ◽  
M Yamamoto ◽  
Y Ninomiya ◽  
...  

SUMMARY The relationship between lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and prognosis in patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) is unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate prognostic factors in patients with lymph node-negative SESCC. A total of 195 patients with pathologically confirmed T1a-MM, T1b, and lymph node-negative SESCC were retrospectively reviewed in this study. Overall, the disease-free survival (DFS) rate was poorer in the lymphatic invasion-positive group than in the lymphatic invasion-negative group (p = 0.002) and a multivariate analysis suggested that lymphatic invasion was the only independent prognostic factor of DFS in patients with lymph node-negative SESCC (HR = 4.075, p = 0.005). Distant organ recurrence occurred in one patient (1/52, 1.9%) in the T1b-SM2 group and in six patients (6/61, 9.7%) in the T1b-SM3 group; all of these patients had LVI. LVI-positive patients had a poorer DFS than invasion-negative patients in the T1b-SM2 and SM3 groups (p = 0.026), and a multivariate analysis suggested that LVI was the only independent prognostic factor of DFS in patients with lymph node-negative SM2 and SM3 SESCC (HR = 5.165, p = 0.031). Lymph node-positive patients had a significantly poorer DFS rate than lymph node negative and LVI positive patients among the SM2 and SM3 SESCC patients (p = 0.018). The present results suggested that LVI was an independent prognostic factor in patients with SM2 and SM3 lymph node-negative SESCC; however their prognosis was not worse than that of patients with lymph node-positive SM2 and SM3 SESCC, for whom adjuvant therapy is indicated as a standard treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R van der Werf, Leonie ◽  
Marra, PhD Elske ◽  
S Gisbertz, PhD Suzanne ◽  
P L Wijnhoven, PhD Bas ◽  
I van Berge Henegouwen, PhD Mark

Abstract Introduction Previous studies evaluating the association of LN yield and survival presented conflicting results and many may be influenced by confounding and stage migration. This study aimed to evaluate whether the quality indicator ‘retrieval of at least 15 lymph nodes (LNs)’ is associated with better long-term survival and more accurate pathological staging in patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and resection. Methods Data of esophageal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery between 2011-2016 was retrieved from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit. Patients with <15 LNs and ≥15 LNs were compared after propensity score matching based on patient and tumor characteristics. The primary endpoint was 3-year survival. To evaluate the effect of LN yield on the accuracy of pathological staging, pathological N-stage was evaluated and 3-year survival was analyzed in a subgroup of patients node-negative disease. Results In 2260 of 3281 patients (67%) ≥15 LNs were retrieved. In total, 992 patients with ≥15 LNs were matched to 992 patients with <15 LNs. The 3-year survival did not differ between the two groups (57% versus 54%, p=0.28). pN+ was scored in 41% of patients with ≥15 LNs versus 35% of patients with <15 LNs. For node-negative patients, the 3-year survival was significantly better for patients with ≥15 LNs (69% versus 61%, p=0.01). Conclusions In this propensity score matched cohort, 3-year survival was comparable for patients with ≥15 LNs, although increasing nodal yield was associated with more accurate staging. In node-negative patients, 3-year survival was higher for patients with ≥15 LNs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 615-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Trilling ◽  
E. Cotte ◽  
D. Vaudoyer ◽  
S. Isaac ◽  
E. Piaton ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (18) ◽  
pp. 3469-3478 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Wiedswang ◽  
E. Borgen ◽  
R. Kåresen ◽  
G. Kvalheim ◽  
J.M. Nesland ◽  
...  

Purpose: This study was performed to disclose the clinical impact of isolated tumor cell (ITC) detection in bone marrow (BM) in breast cancer. Patients and Methods: BM aspirates were collected from 817 patients at primary surgery. Tumor cells in BM were detected by immunocytochemistry using anticytokeratin antibodies (AE1/AE3). Analyses of the primary tumor included histologic grading, vascular invasion, and immunohistochemical detection of c-erbB-2, cathepsin D, p53, and estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PgR) expression. These analyses were compared with clinical outcome. The median follow-up was 49 months. Results: ITC were detected in 13.2% of the patients. The detection rate rose with increasing tumor size (P = .011) and lymph node involvement (P < .001). Systemic relapse and death from breast cancer occurred in 31.7% and 26.9% of the BM-positive patients versus 13.7% and 10.9% of BM-negative patients, respectively (P < .001). Analyzing node-positive and node-negative patients separately, ITC positivity was associated with poor prognosis in the node-positive group and in node-negative patients not receiving adjuvant therapy (T1N0). In multivariate analysis, ITC in BM was an independent prognostic factor together with node, tumor, and ER/PgR status, histologic grade, and vascular invasion. In separate analysis of the T1N0 patients, histologic grade was independently associated with both distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS), ITC detection was associated with BCSS, and vascular invasion was associated with DDFS. Conclusion: ITC in BM is an independent predictor of DDFS and BCSS. An unfavorable prognosis was observed for node-positive patients and for node-negative patients not receiving systemic therapy. A combination of several independent prognostic factors can classify subgroups of patients into excellent and high-risk prognosis groups.


2004 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 171
Author(s):  
R Rampaul ◽  
S Pinder ◽  
J Robertson ◽  
L Ellis ◽  
R Blamey

2009 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. S83
Author(s):  
H. Castel ◽  
S. Bellati ◽  
M. Hazzan ◽  
C. Noel ◽  
S. Dharancy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document