Pressure-Sensing Gastric Calibration Tube for Minimizing Sleeve Volume Variation in Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared with Current Standard Technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 5162-5166
Author(s):  
Parker E. Ludwig ◽  
Trevor J. Huff ◽  
Kristin Bremer ◽  
Kalyana C. Nandipati
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 4256-4257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Loureiro ◽  
Abdulah Sultan ◽  
Mohannad Alhaddad ◽  
Hatem Mostafa ◽  
David Nocca ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 483-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Uematsu ◽  
M. Kasami ◽  
Y. Uchida ◽  
J. Sanuki ◽  
K. Kimura ◽  
...  

Background: Hookwire localization is the current standard technique for radiological marking of nonpalpable breast lesions. Stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVAB) is of sufficient sensitivity and specificity to replace surgical biopsy. Wire localization for metallic marker clips placed after SVAB is needed. Purpose: To describe a method for performing computed tomography (CT)-guided hookwire localization using a radial approach for metallic marker clips placed percutaneously after SVAB. Material and Methods: Nineteen women scheduled for SVAB with marker-clip placement, CT-guided wire localization of marker clips, and, eventually, surgical excision were prospectively entered into the study. CT-guided wire localization was performed with a radial approach, followed by placement of a localizing marker-clip surgical excision. Feasibility and reliability of the procedure and the incidence of complications were examined. Results: CT-guided wire localization surgical excision was successfully performed in all 19 women without any complications. The mean total procedure time was 15 min. The median distance on CT image from marker clip to hookwire was 2 mm (range 0–3 mm). Conclusion: CT-guided preoperative hookwire localization with a radial approach for marker clips after SVAB is technically feasible.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 953-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M. Nazia Fathima ◽  
R. Tamilselvi ◽  
M. Parisa Beham ◽  
D. Sabarinathan

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis, a silent killing disease of fracture risk, is normally determined based on the bone mineral density (BMD) and T-score values measured in bone. However, development of standard algorithms for accurate segmentation and BMD measurement from X-ray images is a challenge in the medical field. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work is to more accurately measure BMD from X-ray images, which can overcome the limitations of the current standard technique to measure BMD using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) such as non-availability and inaccessibility of DEXA machines in developing countries. In addition, this work also attempts to analyze the DEXA scan images for better segmentation and measurement of BMD. METHODS: This work employs a modified U-Net with Attention unit for accurate segmentation of bone region from X-Ray and DEXA images. A linear regression model is developed to compute BMD and T-score. Based on the value of T-score, the images are then classified as normal, osteopenia or osteoporosis. RESULTS: The proposed network is experimented with the two internally collected datasets namely, DEXSIT and XSITRAY, comprised of DEXA and X-ray images, respectively. The proposed method achieved an accuracy of 88% on both datasets. The Dice score on DEXSIT and XSITRAY is 0.94 and 0.92, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our modified U-Net with attention unit achieves significantly higher results in terms of Dice score and classification accuracy. The computed BMD and T-score values of the proposed method are also compared with the respective clinical reports for validation. Hence, using the digitized X-Ray images can be used to detect osteoporosis efficiently and accurately.


Vascular ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 264-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisandro Carnero ◽  
Ross Milner

Aortic endograft surveillance is a necessity for the lifetime of a patient owing to the risk of endoleaks and device complications. The current standard of care for surveillance is radiologic imaging. The most commonly used modality is computed tomographic angiography. Magnetic resonance angiography and ultrasonography have also been used as surveillance tools. These imaging techniques have risks and limitations, and alternative surveillance tools are being investigated. Remote pressure sensing is a promising technology that can provide adjunctive support to the current imaging modalities. The technology is applicable to both abdominal and thoracic endograft implantation and surveillance. It has recently gained clearance from the US Food and Drug Administration for acute aneurysm exclusion during an abdominal endograft insertion. As more data are accumulated, it may be possible for remote pressure sensing to replace current imaging techniques as the sole modality for endograft surveillance.


2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Giusti ◽  
Silvia Proietti ◽  
Luca Villa ◽  
Jonathan Cloutier ◽  
Marco Rosso ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 198 (1) ◽  
pp. W93-W93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Tulchinsky ◽  
Harvey A. Ziessman ◽  
Alan H. Maurer

Author(s):  
Peter Valentin Tomazic ◽  
Fabian Sommer ◽  
Andreas Treccosti ◽  
Hans Rudolf Briner ◽  
Andreas Leunig

Abstract Purpose The current standard endoscopic technique is a high resolution visualisation up to Full HD and even 4 K. A recent development are 3D endoscopes providing a 3-dimensional picture, which supposedly gives additional information of depth, anatomical details and orientation in the surgical field. Since the 3D-endoscopic technique is new, little scientific evidence is known whether the new technique provides advantages for the surgeon compared to the 2D-endoscopic standard technique in FESS. This study compares the standard 2D-endoscopic surgical technique with the new commercially available 3D-endoscopic technique. Methods The prospective randomized interventional multicenter study included a total of 80 referred patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with and without polyps without prior surgery. A bilateral FESS procedure was performed, one side with the 2D-endoscopic technique, the other side with the 3D-endoscopic technique. The time of duration was measured. Additionally, a questionnaire containing 20 items was completed by 4 different surgeons judging subjective impression of visualisation and handling. Results 2D imaging was superior to 3D apart from “recognition of details”, “depth perception” and “3D effect”. For usability properties 2D was superior to 3D apart from “weight of endoscopes”. Mean duration for surgery was 26.1 min for 2D and 27.4 min. for 3D without statistical significance (P = 0.219). Conclusion Three-dimensional endoscopy features improved depth perception and recognition of anatomic details but worse overall picture quality. It is useful for teaching purposes, yet 2D techniques provide a better outcome in terms of feasibility for routine endoscopic approaches.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document