Long-term outcomes after robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in long-term health-related quality of life in patients undergoing total gastrectomy versus Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in a tertiary referral center. Background & Methods Surgical treatment for gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers is challenging. Both a total gastrectomy and an esophagectomy can be performed. Which of the two should be preferred is unknown given the scarce evidence regarding effects on surgical morbidity, pathology, long-term survival and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). From 2014 to 2018, patients with a follow-up of > 1 year after either a total gastrectomy or an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for GEJ or cardia carcinoma completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-OG25 questionnaires. Problems with eating, reflux and nausea and vomiting were chosen as the primary HR-QoL endpoints. The secondary endpoints were the remaining HR-QoL domains, postoperative complications and pathology results. Multivariable linear regression was applied taking confounders age, gender, ASA classification and neoadjuvant therapy into account. Results 30 patients after gastrectomy and 71 after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with a mean age of 63 years were included. Median follow-up was two years (range 12-84 months). Patients after total gastrectomy reported significantly less choking when swallowing and coughing (β=-5.952, 95% CI -9.437 – -2.466; β=-13.084, 95% CI -18.525 – -7.643). Problems with eating, reflux and nausea and vomiting were not significantly different between the two groups. No significant difference was found in postoperative complications or Clavien-Dindo grade. Significantly more lymph nodes were resected in esophagectomy group (p=0.008). No difference in number of positive lymph nodes or R0 resection was found. Conclusion After a follow-up of > 1 year choking when swallowing and coughing were less common after total gastrectomy. No significant difference was found in problems with eating, reflux or nausea and vomiting nor in postoperative complications or radicality of surgery. Based on this study no general preference can be given to either of the procedures for GEJ cancer. Patients may be informed about the HR-QoL domains that are likely to be affected by the different surgical procedures, which in turn may support shared decision making when a choice between the two treatment options is possible.

Download Full-text

Robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a review of the technique

Updates in Surgery ◽

10.1007/s13304-021-01000-y ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Konstantinos Chouliaras ◽

Steven Hochwald ◽

Moshim Kukar

Keyword(s):

Ivor Lewis ◽

Robotic Assisted ◽

Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

Download Full-text

Robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the elderly patient.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.93 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽

pp. 93-93

Author(s):

Andrea M. Abbott ◽

Tobin Joel Crill Strom ◽

Nadia Saeed ◽

Ravi Shridhar ◽

Sarah E. Hoffe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

The Elderly ◽

Separate Analysis ◽

Ivor Lewis ◽

Robotic Assisted ◽

Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽

Estimated Blood Loss ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The Impact

93 Background: Esophageal cancer continues to increase in incidence worldwide with the age of diagnosis continuing to move towards an older onset. Robotic assisted approaches to esophagectomy have demonstrated decreased complications and length of hospitalization (LOH). We sought to examine the impact of age on outcomes in patients undergoing robotic assisted esophagectomy (RAIL). Methods: From 2009-2013, we identified patients undergoing robotic assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Patients were then stratified according to 3 age groups. Cohort 1, age less then 50, cohort 2, age 50-70, and cohort 3 >70. Statistical comparisons between LOH, operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), adverse events (AE) and mortality were made with Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square tests. Results: We identified 134 patients who underwent RAIL and found no statistically significant difference between the three cohorts for OT, LOH, days spent in intensive care, AE or mortality. There was a difference in EBL with higher median blood loss (150 cc) seen in cohort 1 (50-600cc) and 3 (50-400cc) compared to cohort 2 (100 cc, (25-400cc)), p < 0.01. The most common AE were arrhythmia and pneumonia but this was not significantly different between the cohorts. The overall AE rate was 10% (cohort 1), 21% (cohort 2), 34% (cohort 3), p=0.14. There were 4 leaks (p =0.38) and 2 deaths (p=0.90) in the entire cohort. A separate analysis was done to compare elderly (>70) to the non-elderly (<70). Median EBL was higher in the elderly cohort (100cc (25-600) vs 150cc (50-400), p <0.01). There was a trend towards longer LOH in the elderly (9 (4-35) vs 11 (6-38) days, p =0.06). AE and mortality were not significantly different, although there was a trend toward increased AE (19.8% vs 34%, p=0.07) in the elderly, with arrhythmia being the most common AE. Conclusions: RAIL is a safe surgical technique for use in an aging patient population. We demonstrated there was no increased risk of LOH, AE or death in the elderly patients compared to their younger cohort.

Download Full-text

Readmission after robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Earlier discharge, increased readmissions?

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.149 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 149-149

Author(s):

Ahmed I. Salem ◽

Ravi Shridhar ◽

Sarah E. Hoffe ◽

Khaldoun Almhanna ◽

Kenneth Meredith

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽

Statistical Tests ◽

P Value ◽

Readmission Rates ◽

Historical Cohort ◽

Ivor Lewis ◽

Robotic Assisted ◽

Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽

The Impact

149 Background: Readmissions after esophagectomy are costly and incidence can be as high as 25%. The robotic assisted approach has potential benefits of earlier discharge compared to conventional techniques, however it is unclear what impact an earlier discharge will have on readmission rates. We sought to examine the impact of early discharge on readmission rates with robotic approaches. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing robotic assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (RAIL) from 2009-2015 was conducted. Clinicopathologic factors and surgical outcomes were recorded and compared. We then compared outcomes to a historical cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data (2002 to 2009). Length of stay, 30-day and 90-day readmissions, and mortality were determined. All statistical tests were two-sided and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: We identified 147 patients who underwent RAIL. There were 78.9% (116) male with an average age 66 ±10 years. Adenocarcinoma was the predominant histology in 86% (126) patients, 9.52% (14) patients had squamous cell histology, and 4.76% (7) patients had other histology. Neoadjuvant therapy was administered to 77.6% (114) patients. In the SEER database 1,744 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy: 80% of patients (1,390) were male, with a mean age of 73 years; 71.8% of tumors (1,251) were adenocarcinomas, and 38% of patients (667) received neoadjuvant therapy. Median length of stay was 13 days, 30-day mortality was 8.8% (158 patients), and 90 day mortality was 17.9% (302) compared to median LOH of 9 days, 30-day mortality of 0.6% (1) and 90-day mortality of 1.4% (2)% in the robotic cohort, p < 0.0001, p = 0.007, and p < 0.0001. Readmission rates at 30 and 90 days were 18.6% (212) and 31.3% (356) in the SEER patients, and 3.4% (5) and 5.4% (8) in the robotic cohort p = 0.001 and p < 0.001. Conclusions: RAIL is a safe surgical technique that provides an alternative to conventional approaches to esophageal resection. Patients undergoing RAIL had lower mortality rates and LOH. Despite the lower LOH, RAIL was associated with lower 30 and 90-day readmissions.

Download Full-text