Readmission after robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Earlier discharge, increased readmissions?

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 149-149
Author(s):  
Ahmed I. Salem ◽  
Ravi Shridhar ◽  
Sarah E. Hoffe ◽  
Khaldoun Almhanna ◽  
Kenneth Meredith
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
P Value ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽  
The Impact

149 Background: Readmissions after esophagectomy are costly and incidence can be as high as 25%. The robotic assisted approach has potential benefits of earlier discharge compared to conventional techniques, however it is unclear what impact an earlier discharge will have on readmission rates. We sought to examine the impact of early discharge on readmission rates with robotic approaches. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing robotic assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (RAIL) from 2009-2015 was conducted. Clinicopathologic factors and surgical outcomes were recorded and compared. We then compared outcomes to a historical cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data (2002 to 2009). Length of stay, 30-day and 90-day readmissions, and mortality were determined. All statistical tests were two-sided and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: We identified 147 patients who underwent RAIL. There were 78.9% (116) male with an average age 66 ±10 years. Adenocarcinoma was the predominant histology in 86% (126) patients, 9.52% (14) patients had squamous cell histology, and 4.76% (7) patients had other histology. Neoadjuvant therapy was administered to 77.6% (114) patients. In the SEER database 1,744 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy: 80% of patients (1,390) were male, with a mean age of 73 years; 71.8% of tumors (1,251) were adenocarcinomas, and 38% of patients (667) received neoadjuvant therapy. Median length of stay was 13 days, 30-day mortality was 8.8% (158 patients), and 90 day mortality was 17.9% (302) compared to median LOH of 9 days, 30-day mortality of 0.6% (1) and 90-day mortality of 1.4% (2)% in the robotic cohort, p < 0.0001, p = 0.007, and p < 0.0001. Readmission rates at 30 and 90 days were 18.6% (212) and 31.3% (356) in the SEER patients, and 3.4% (5) and 5.4% (8) in the robotic cohort p = 0.001 and p < 0.001. Conclusions: RAIL is a safe surgical technique that provides an alternative to conventional approaches to esophageal resection. Patients undergoing RAIL had lower mortality rates and LOH. Despite the lower LOH, RAIL was associated with lower 30 and 90-day readmissions.

792 OUTCOMES AFTER TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE VERSUS HYBRID OR OPEN IVOR LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL ESODATA STUDY GROUP.

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Berend Van Der Wilk ◽  
Eliza R C Hagens ◽  
Ben M Eyck ◽  
Suzanne S Gisbertz ◽  
Richard Hillegersberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Open Esophagectomy ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract   To compare complications following totally minimally invasive (TMIE), laparoscopically assisted (hybrid) and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Three randomized trials have reported benefits for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Two studies compared TMIE versus open esophagectomy and another compared hybrid versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Only small retrospective studies compared TMIE with hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Methods Data were used from the International Esodata Study Group assessing patients undergoing TMIE, hybrid or open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Primary outcome was pneumonia, secondary outcomes included incidence and severity of anastomotic leakage, (major) complications, length of stay, escalation of care and 90-day mortality. Data were analyzed using multivariate multilevel models. Results In total, 4733 patients were included in this study (TMIE:1472, hybrid:1364 and open:1897). Patients undergoing TMIE had lower incidence of pneumonia compared to hybrid (10.9% vs 16.3%, Odds Ratio (OR):0.56, 95%CI: 0.40–0.80) and open esophagectomy (10.9% vs 17.4%, OR:0.60, 95%CI: 0.42–0.84) and had shorter length of stay (median 10 days (IQR 8–16)) compared to hybrid (14 (11–19), p = 0.041) and open esophagectomy (11 (9–16), p = 0.027). Patients undergoing TMIE had higher rate of anastomotic leakage compared to hybrid (15.1% vs 10.7%, OR:1.47, 95%CI: 1.01–2.13) and open esophagectomy (7.3%, OR:1.73, 95%CI: 1.26–2.38). No differences were reported between hybrid and open esophagectomy. Conclusion Compared to hybrid and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, TMIE resulted in a lower pneumonia rate, a shorter hospital length of stay but a higher anastomotic leakage rate. The impact of these individual complications on survival and long-term quality of life should be further investigated.

Robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the elderly patient.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 93-93
Author(s):  
Andrea M. Abbott ◽  
Tobin Joel Crill Strom ◽  
Nadia Saeed ◽  
Ravi Shridhar ◽  
Sarah E. Hoffe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Separate Analysis ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

93 Background: Esophageal cancer continues to increase in incidence worldwide with the age of diagnosis continuing to move towards an older onset. Robotic assisted approaches to esophagectomy have demonstrated decreased complications and length of hospitalization (LOH). We sought to examine the impact of age on outcomes in patients undergoing robotic assisted esophagectomy (RAIL). Methods: From 2009-2013, we identified patients undergoing robotic assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Patients were then stratified according to 3 age groups. Cohort 1, age less then 50, cohort 2, age 50-70, and cohort 3 >70. Statistical comparisons between LOH, operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), adverse events (AE) and mortality were made with Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square tests. Results: We identified 134 patients who underwent RAIL and found no statistically significant difference between the three cohorts for OT, LOH, days spent in intensive care, AE or mortality. There was a difference in EBL with higher median blood loss (150 cc) seen in cohort 1 (50-600cc) and 3 (50-400cc) compared to cohort 2 (100 cc, (25-400cc)), p < 0.01. The most common AE were arrhythmia and pneumonia but this was not significantly different between the cohorts. The overall AE rate was 10% (cohort 1), 21% (cohort 2), 34% (cohort 3), p=0.14. There were 4 leaks (p =0.38) and 2 deaths (p=0.90) in the entire cohort. A separate analysis was done to compare elderly (>70) to the non-elderly (<70). Median EBL was higher in the elderly cohort (100cc (25-600) vs 150cc (50-400), p <0.01). There was a trend towards longer LOH in the elderly (9 (4-35) vs 11 (6-38) days, p =0.06). AE and mortality were not significantly different, although there was a trend toward increased AE (19.8% vs 34%, p=0.07) in the elderly, with arrhythmia being the most common AE. Conclusions: RAIL is a safe surgical technique for use in an aging patient population. We demonstrated there was no increased risk of LOH, AE or death in the elderly patients compared to their younger cohort.

Long-term outcomes after robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pridvi Kandagatla ◽  
Ali Hussein Ghandour ◽  
Ali Amro ◽  
Andrew Popoff ◽  
Zane Hammoud
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

Evaluation of Targeted Pharmacist Interventions to Reduce Length of Stay in an Acute Care Practice Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 471-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary-Haston Leary ◽  
Kathryn Morbitzer ◽  
Bobbi Jo Walston ◽  
Stephen Clark ◽  
Jenna Kaplan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
A Value ◽  
Pharmacist Interventions ◽  
Semistructured Interviews ◽  
The Impact

Background: Despite widespread recognition of the need for innovative pharmacy practice approaches, the development and implementation of value-based outcomes remains difficult to achieve. Furthermore, gaps in the literature persist because the majority of available literature is retrospective in nature and describes only the clinical impact of pharmacists’ interventions. Objective: Length of stay (LOS) is a clinical outcome metric used to represent efficiency in health care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of pharmacist-driven interventions on LOS in the acute care setting. Methods: A separate samples pretest-posttest design was utilized to compare the effect of pharmacist interventions across 3 practice areas (medicine, hematology/oncology, and pediatrics). Two time periods were evaluated: preimplementation (PRE) and a pilot period, postimplementation of interventions (POST). Interventions included targeted discharge services, such as discharge prescription writing (with provider cosignature). Participating pharmacists completed semistructured interviews following the pilot. Results: A total of 924 patients (466 PRE and 458 POST) were included in the analysis. The median LOS decreased from 4.95 (interquartile range = 3.24-8.5) to 4.12 (2.21-7.96) days from the PRE versus POST groups, respectively ( P < 0.011). There was no difference in readmission rates between groups (21% vs 19.1%, P = 0.7). Interviews revealed several themes, including positive impact on professional development. Conclusion and Relevance: This pilot study demonstrated the ability of pharmacist interventions to reduce LOS. Pharmacists identified time as the primary barrier and acknowledged the importance of leaders prioritizing pharmacists’ responsibilities. This study is novel in targeting LOS, providing a value-based outcome for clinical pharmacy services.

scholarly journals effects of anemia education using web-based she smart to improve knowledge, attitudes, and practice in adolescent girls

2022 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49
Author(s):  
Ernawati Ernawati ◽  
Yusring Sanusi Baso ◽  
Healthy Hidayanty ◽  
Syafruddin Syarif ◽  
Aminuddin Aminuddin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adolescent Girls ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
P Value ◽  
Growth Disorders ◽  
Normal Numbers ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Smart Education ◽  
The Impact

Anemia is a state of hemoglobin levels in the bloodless than normal numbers according to the sex and age group. The impact of anemia in adolescents is a decrease in achievement and learning spirit and can cause symptoms such as paleness, lethargy, decreased appetite, and growth disorders. Anemia has an impact not only on the health of adolescent girls but can have a long impact on the health of the mother and fetus. You can see the influence of anemia education on knowledge, attitudes, and practice. Uses the Pre-experimental method with the design of one group pretest and posttest. Sampling technique using purposive sampling with the number of 47 adolescent girls. The research was conducted at Senior High School 12 Makassar in September-October 2021. Data analysis using the McNemar test. From the results of statistical tests showed that there was an influence on the use of web-based she smart education model on the use of adolescent girls about anemia with p-value = 0.000 (p<0.05), attitude p-value = 0.016 (p<0.05) and action p-value = 0.001 (p<0.05). Anemia education using web-based she smart can improve knowledge, attitudes, and practice before and after an intervention.

Pharmacist-Led Transition of Care Pilot Targeting Older People After Emergency Department Discharge

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 273-282
Author(s):  
Scott M. Pearson ◽  
Anushka Tandon ◽  
Danielle R. Fixen ◽  
Sunny A. Linnebur ◽  
Gretchen M. Orosz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Older People ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Transitional Care ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
P Value ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-led transitional care intervention targeting high-risk older people after an emergency department (ED) visit.<br/> DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of older people with ED visits prior to and during a pharmacist-led intervention.<br/> SETTING: Patients receiving primary care from the University of Colorado Health Seniors Clinic.<br/> PARTICIPANTS: The intervention cohort comprised 170 patients with an ED visit between August 18, 2018, and February 19, 2019, and the historical cohort included 166 patients with an ED visit between August 18, 2017, and February 19, 2018. All included patients either had a historical diagnosis of heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or they had an additional ED visit in the previous six months.<br/> INTERVENTIONS: The pilot intervention involved postED discharge telephonic outreach and assessment by a clinical pharmacist, with triaging to other staff if necessary.<br/> MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with at least one repeat ED visit, hospitalization, or death within 30 days of ED discharge. Outcome rates were also assessed at 90 days postdischarge.<br/> RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 21% of the historical cohort and 25% of the intervention cohort (adjusted P-value = 0.48). The incidence of the composite outcome within 90 days of ED discharge was 43% in the historical group compared with 38% in the intervention group (adjusted P-value = 0.29).<br/> CONCLUSION: A pharmacist-led telephonic intervention pilot targeting older people did not appear to have a significant effect on the composite of repeat ED visit, hospitalization, or death within 30 or 90 days of ED discharge. A limited sample size may hinder the ability to make definitive conclusions based on these findings.

scholarly journals Comparison of open and robotic-assisted prostatectomy: The University of British Columbia experience

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis-Olivier Gagnon ◽  
Larry Goldenberg ◽  
Kenny Lynch ◽  
Antonio Hurtado ◽  
Martin Gleave
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Positive Surgical Margin ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: We assessed outcomes and costs of open prostatectomy (OP) versus robotic-assisted prostatectomy (RAP) at a single tertiary care university hospital.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 200 consecutive OP by 1 experienced open surgeon (MG) and 200 consecutive RAP by an experienced open surgeon (SLG), after allowing for a short learning curve of 70 cases.Results: The 2 groups had similar demographics, including mean age (64.7 vs. 64.2) and mean body mass index (27.2 vs. 27.2). The OP group had a higher proportion of higher risk cancers compared to the RAP group (32.5% vs. 8.5%). Mean skin-to-skin operative room time was less for the OP (114.2 vs. 234.1 minutes). Transfusion rates were similar at 1.5% with OP compared to 3.5% with RAP. The mean length of stay was 1.78 days for OP compared to 1.76 days for RAP, for the last 100 patients in each group. The OP group had more high-grade disease in the prostatectomy specimen, with Gleason ≥8 in 23.5% compared to 3.5% in the RAP group. Positive surgical margin rates were comparable at 31% for OP and 24.6% for RAP, and remained similar after stratification for pT2 and pT3 disease. The grade I and II perioperative complication rate (Clavien-Dindo classification) was lower in the OP group (8.5% vs. 20%). Postoperative stress urinary incontinence rates (4.8% for OP and 4.6% for RAP) and biochemical-free status (91.8% for OP and 96% for RAP) did not differ at 12 months post-surgery. The additional cost of RAP was calculated as $5629 per case. The main limitations of this study are its retrospective nature and lack of validated questionnaires for evaluation of postoperative functional outcomes.Conclusion: While hospital length of stay, transfusion rates, positive surgical margin rates and postoperative urinary incontinence were similar, OP had a shorter operative time and a lower cost compared to the very early experience of RAP. Future parallel prospective analysis will address the impact of the learning curve on these outcomes.

scholarly journals Impact of a specialist service in the Emergency Department on admission, length of stay and readmission of patients presenting with falls, syncope and dizziness

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Jusmanova ◽  
C Rice ◽  
R Bourke ◽  
A Lavan ◽  
C G McMahon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Specialist Service ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact

Summary Background Up to half of patients presenting with falls, syncope or dizziness are admitted to hospital. Many are discharged without a clear diagnosis for their index episode, however, and therefore a relatively high risk of readmission. Aim To examine the impact of ED-FASS (Emergency Department Falls and Syncope Service) a dedicated specialist service embedded within an ED, seeing patients of all ages with falls, syncope and dizziness. Design Pre- and post-cohort study. Methods Admission rates, length of stay (LOS) and readmission at 3 months were examined for all patients presenting with a fall, syncope or dizziness from April to July 2018 (pre-ED-FASS) inclusive and compared to April to July 2019 inclusive (post-ED-FASS). Results There was a significantly lower admission rate for patients presenting in 2019 compared to 2018 [27% (453/1676) vs. 34% (548/1620); X2 = 18.0; P &lt; 0.001], with a 20% reduction in admissions. The mean LOS for patients admitted in 2018 was 20.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 17.4–24.0] days compared to 18.2 (95% CI 14.6–21.9) days in 2019 (t = 0.98; P = 0.3294). This accounts for 11 344 bed days in the 2018 study period, and 8299 bed days used after ED-FASS. There was also a significant reduction in readmission rates within 3 months of index presentation, from 21% (109/1620) to 16% (68/1676) (X2 = 4.68; P = 0.030). Conclusion This study highlights the significant potential benefits of embedding dedicated multidisciplinary services at the hospital front door in terms of early specialist assessment and directing appropriate patients to effective ambulatory care pathways.

Robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a review of the technique

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Chouliaras ◽  
Steven Hochwald ◽  
Moshim Kukar
Keyword(s):  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

The Impact of Obesity on the Perioperative, Clinicopathologic, and Oncologic Outcomes of Robot Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajit Pai ◽  
Fahad Alsabhan ◽  
John J. Park ◽  
George Melich ◽  
Suela Sulo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
P Value ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Lymph Node Yield ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
The Impact

Purpose: To analyze the feasibility and outcomes of robotic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients. Methods: From 2005 to 2012, 101 consecutive rectal cancers operated robotically were enrolled in a prospective database. Patients were stratified into obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m2) groups. Operative, perioperative parameters, and pathologic outcomes were compared. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0, while statistical significance was defined as a p value ≤ .05. Results: There were 33 obese patients (mean BMI 33.8 kg/m2). Patients were comparable regarding gender, T stage, and type of operation. Operative time and blood loss were higher in the obese group; only operative time was statistically significant. The conversion rate, length of stay, and anastomotic leak rates were similar. Circumferential margin positivity and lymph node yield were comparable. Disease free and overall survivals at 3 years were 75.8% versus 80.9% and 84.8% versus 92.6%, respectively for obese and non-obese subgroups. Conclusions: Robotic surgery for curative treatment of rectal cancer in the obese is safe and feasible. BMI does not influence conversion rates, length of stay, postoperative complications, and quality of the specimen or survival when the robotic platform is used.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document