Paris II and Rotterdam criteria are the best predictors of outcomes in patients with primary biliary cholangitis in Japan

Author(s):  
Naruhiro Kimura ◽  
Masaaki Takamura ◽  
Nobutaka Takeda ◽  
Yusuke Watanabe ◽  
Yoshihisa Arao ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Voitl ◽  
T Hippchen ◽  
C Zhang-Hagenlocher ◽  
KH Weiss ◽  
C Rupp

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-39
Author(s):  
Roongruedee Chaiteerakij

Autoimmuneliver diseases, particularly autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cholangitis,are not uncommon among the Thai population. This article summarizes main findings of studies of autoimmune liver diseases published during the past year, which included natural history and long-termoutcomes of primary biliary cholangitis treatment, a promising result of the new treatment for primary sclerosing cholangitis and outcomes of a second-line therapy of autoimmune hepatitis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deng Yan ◽  
Wang Yan-Fang ◽  
Zhu Shi-Yang ◽  
Ma Rui-Lin ◽  
Ding Xue-Song ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To describe the diagnostic criteria used and their application accuracy in the practice of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) caring among obstetricians and gynaecologists across China. Methods This was an Online cross-sectional survey of Obstetricians and gynecologists involved in PCOS caring conducted via the largest continuing education platform of obstetrics and gynecology across China from September 2019 to November 2019. Results A total of 2,328 respondents were eligible for the final analysis. Of these, 94.5 % were general obstetricians and gynaecologists (Ge-ObGyn), and 5.5 % were reproductive endocrinologists (Re-ObGyn). Overall, the most frequently used criteria were the Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Society (AE-PCOS) criteria (48.2 %), followed by the Rotterdam criteria (35.7 %) and NIH criteria (12.1 %). Of the respondents, 31.3 % used their diagnostic criteria in their clinical practice. More respondents who chose the Rotterdam criteria could accurately apply the diagnostic criteria than those who chose the AE-PCOS criteria (41.2 % vs. 32.1 %, P < 0.001). Compared with Ge-ObGyn, Re-ObGyn were less likely to use the AE-PCOS criteria (adjusted odds ratio, 0.513; 95 % CI, 0.328–0.802; P < 0.05) and 1.492 times more likely to accurately use their criteria (95 % CI, 1.014–2.196; P < 0.05). Conclusions Less than one-third of obstetricians and gynaecologists across China could accurately use the diagnostic criteria they choose to diagnose PCOS. There is an urgent need to train obstetricians and gynaecologists on PCOS diagnosis in an effort to improve the medical care quality of patients with PCOS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document