The interactional effect between employees’ perceived materialistic rewards and marital status on attitudinal and behavioral outcomes: An empirical investigation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiseon Shin ◽  
Junghyun Park
Keyword(s):  
Marital Status ◽  
Empirical Investigation ◽  
Behavioral Outcomes ◽  
Interactional Effect

scholarly journals A Study of Scientific Aptitude of Women Teachers in Relation to Social Class and Marital Status

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ram Naresh ◽  
Dr. Himani Upadhyaya
Keyword(s):  
Social Class ◽  
Marital Status ◽  
Factorial Design ◽  
Women Teachers ◽  
Individual Effect ◽  
Aptitude Test ◽  
Level Of Significance ◽  
Interactional Effect

The purpose of the present study was to find out the effect of Social Class and Marital Status on Scientific Aptitude of Women Teachers. 640 Women teachers were selected randomly from the schools out of 640, 160 were for each Social Class (General, OBC, SC and ST) out of each 160 group, 80 were married and 80 were Unmarried. For measurement of the Scientific Aptitude standardized ‘Science Aptitude Test’ developed by A.K.P. Sinha and L.N.K. Sinha, was used. Data were analyzed with help of 4×2 Factorial design of ANOVA. The result revealed that, significant individual effect for social class at the 0.01 level of significance, and interactional effect for social class and marital status at the 0.05 level of significance were found on Scientific Aptitude of Women teachers.

Marital Status May Influence Alzheimer's Risk

2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 60-61
Author(s):  
MICHELE G. SULLIVAN
Keyword(s):  
Marital Status

Self-Esteem and the SCII: Empirical Investigation of a Clinical Observation

1979 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-86
Author(s):  
Karen Friedel ◽  
Jo-Ida Hansen ◽  
Thomas J. Hummel ◽  
Warren F. Shaffer
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Investigation ◽  
Clinical Observation ◽  
Self Esteem

Self-Injurious Behavior vs. Nonsuicidal Self-Injury

Crisis ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Bloom ◽  
Shareen Holly ◽  
Adam M. P. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Positive Reinforcement ◽  
Empirical Investigation ◽  
High Stress ◽  
Animal Research ◽  
Stress Conditions ◽  
Human Populations ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Self Injury ◽  
Cns Stimulant ◽  
Nonsuicidal Self Injury

Background: Historically, the field of self-injury has distinguished between the behaviors exhibited among individuals with a developmental disability (self-injurious behaviors; SIB) and those present within a normative population (nonsuicidal self-injury; NSSI),which typically result as a response to perceived stress. More recently, however, conclusions about NSSI have been drawn from lines of animal research aimed at examining the neurobiological mechanisms of SIB. Despite some functional similarity between SIB and NSSI, no empirical investigation has provided precedent for the application of SIB-targeted animal research as justification for pharmacological interventions in populations demonstrating NSSI. Aims: The present study examined this question directly, by simulating an animal model of SIB in rodents injected with pemoline and systematically manipulating stress conditions in order to monitor rates of self-injury. Methods: Sham controls and experimental animals injected with pemoline (200 mg/kg) were assigned to either a low stress (discriminated positive reinforcement) or high stress (discriminated avoidance) group and compared on the dependent measures of self-inflicted injury prevalence and severity. Results: The manipulation of stress conditions did not impact the rate of self-injury demonstrated by the rats. The results do not support a model of stress-induced SIB in rodents. Conclusions: Current findings provide evidence for caution in the development of pharmacotherapies of NSSI in human populations based on CNS stimulant models. Theoretical implications are discussed with respect to antecedent factors such as preinjury arousal level and environmental stress.

Psychological Adjustment of Melanoma Survivors

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Hamama-Raz ◽  
Z. Solomon
Keyword(s):  
Malignant Melanoma ◽  
Marital Status ◽  
Psychological Adjustment ◽  
Attachment Style ◽  
Cognitive Appraisal ◽  
Traumatic Events ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Personal Resources ◽  
Secure Attachment ◽  
Ample Evidence

The study examines the contributions of hardiness, attachment style, and cognitive appraisal to the psychological adjustment of 300 survivors of malignant melanoma: The findings show that the survivors' adjustment is by far better predicted by their personal resources and cognitive appraisal than by their sociodemographic features (with the exception of marital status) and features of their illness. Of all the variables, their adjustment was best predicted by their attachment style, with secure attachment making for greater well-being and less distress. These findings add to the ample evidence that personal resources help persons to cope with stressful or traumatic events.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document