Auranofin, an immunosuppressive drug, inhibits MHC class I and MHC class II pathways of antigen presentation in dendritic cells

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 370-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinha Han ◽  
Kwanghee Kim ◽  
Youngcheon Song ◽  
Hyunyul Kim ◽  
Jeunghak Kwon ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 823-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Neefjes ◽  
Marlieke L. M. Jongsma ◽  
Petra Paul ◽  
Oddmund Bakke

1992 ◽  
Vol 176 (2) ◽  
pp. 519-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Nonacs ◽  
C Humborg ◽  
J P Tam ◽  
R M Steinman

We have evaluated the capacity of dendritic cells to function as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) for influenza and have examined their mechanism of action. Virus-pulsed dendritic cells were 100 times more efficient than bulk spleen cells in stimulating cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) formation. The induction of CTLs required neither exogenous lymphokines nor APCs in the responding T cell population. Infectious virus entered dendritic cells through intracellular acidic vacuoles and directed the synthesis of several viral proteins. If ultraviolet (UV)-inactivated or bromelain-treated viruses were used, viral protein synthesis could not be detected, and there was poor induction of CTLs. This indicated that dendritic cells were not capable of processing noninfectious virus onto major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules. However, UV-inactivated and bromelain-treated viruses were presented efficiently to class II-restricted CD4+ T cells. The CD4+ T cells crossreacted with different strains of influenza and markedly amplified CTL formation. Cell lines that lacked MHC class II, and consequently the capacity to stimulate CD4+ T cells, failed to induce CTLs unless helper lymphokines were added. Similarly, dendritic cells pulsed with the MHC class I-restricted nucleoprotein 147-155 peptide were poor stimulators in the absence of exogenous helper factors. We conclude that the function of dendritic cells as APCs for the generation of virus-specific CTLs in vitro depends measurably upon: (a) charging class I molecules with peptides derived from endogenously synthesized viral antigens, and (b) stimulating a strong CD4+ helper T cell response.


Vaccine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (27) ◽  
pp. 3093-3101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delphine Knittel ◽  
Adeline Gadzinski ◽  
Stéphane Hua ◽  
Jordan Denizeau ◽  
Alexandra Savatier ◽  
...  

Autophagy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1681-1682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Loi ◽  
Monique Gannagé ◽  
Christian Münz

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-156
Author(s):  
Şule KARATAŞ ◽  
Fatma SAVRAN OĞUZ

Introduction: Peptides obtained by processing intracellular and extracellular antigens are presented to T cells to stimulate the immune response. This presentation is made by peptide receptors called major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. The regulation mechanisms of MHC molecules, which have similar roles in the immune response, especially at the gene level, have significant differences according to their class. Objective: Class I and class II MHC molecules encoded by MHC genes on the short arm of the sixth chromosome are peptide receptors that stimulate T cell response. These peptides, which will enable the recognition of the antigen from which they originate, are loaded into MHC molecules and presented to T cells. Although the principles of loading and delivering peptides are similar for both molecules, the peptide sources and peptide loading mechanisms are different. In addition, class I molecules are expressed in all nucleated cells while class II molecules are expressed only in Antigen Presentation Cells (APC). These differences; It shows that MHC class I is not expressed by exactly the same transcriptional mechanisms as MHC class II. In our article, we aimed to compare the gene expressions of both classes and reveal their similarities and differences. Discussion and Conclusion: A better understanding of the transcriptional mechanisms of MHC molecules will reveal the role of these molecules in diseases more clearly. In our review, we discussed MHC gene regulation mechanisms with presence of existing informations, which is specific to the MHC class, for contribute to future research. Keywords: MHC class I, MHC class II, MHC gene regulation, promoter, SXY module, transcription


Immunology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 482-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingjun Wang ◽  
Sheila T. Tang ◽  
Anette Stryhn ◽  
Sune Justesen ◽  
Mette V. Larsen ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlota Dobaño ◽  
William O. Rogers ◽  
Kalpana Gowda ◽  
Denise L. Doolan

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Robert ◽  
Chantal Guiet ◽  
Louis Du Pasquier

Three new lymphoid tumors offering an assortment of variants in terms of MHC class I expressions, MHC class II expression, and Ig gene transcription have been discovered in the amphibianXenopus. One was developed in an individual of the isogenic LG15 clone (LG15/0), one in a frog of the LG15/40 clone (derived from a small egg recombinant of LG15), and one (ff-2) in a maleffsib of the individual in which MAR1, the first lymphoid tumor in Xenopus was found 2 years ago. These tumors developed primarily as thymus outgrowths and were transplantable in histocompatible tadpoles but not in nonhistocompatible hosts. Whereas LG15/0 and LG15/40 tumor cells also grow in adult LG15 frogs, theff-2 tumor, like the MAR1 cell line, is rejected by adultffanimals. Using flow cytometry with fluorescence-labeled antibodies and immunoprecipitation analysis, we could demonstrate that, like MAR1, these three new tumors express on their cell surface lymphopoietic markers recognized by mAbs FIF6 and RC47, as well as T-cell lineage markers recognized by mAbs AM22 (CD8-1ike) and X21.2, but not by immunologobulin (Ig) nor MHC class II molecules. Another lymphocyte-specific marker AM15 is expressed by 15/0 and 15/40 but notff-2 tumor cells. Theff-2 tumor cell expresses MHC class molecule in association withβ2-microglobulin on the surface, 15/40 cells contain cytoplasmic Iαchain that is barely detected at the cell surface by fluocytometry, and 15/0 cells do not synthesize class Iαchain at all. The three new tumors all produce large amounts of IgM mRNA of two different sizes but no Ig protein on the membrane nor in the cytoplasm. All tumor cell types synthesize large amount of Myc mRNA and MHC class I-like transcripts considered to be non classical.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document