Associations Between Cancer Fatalism, Causal Attributions, and Perceptions of Benefits and Barriers to Screening for Colorectal Cancer

Author(s):  
Miri Cohen ◽  
Michal Rosenfeld ◽  
Lee Greenblatt-Kimron
2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (12) ◽  
pp. 1128-1135
Author(s):  
Jennifer L Moss ◽  
Rebecca Ehrenkranz ◽  
Lilian G Perez ◽  
Brionna Y Hair ◽  
Anne K Julian

BackgroundCancer screening in the USA is suboptimal, particularly for individuals living in vulnerable communities. This study aimed to understand how rurality and racial segregation are independently and interactively associated with cancer screening and cancer fatalism.MethodsWe used data from a nationally representative sample of adults (n=17 736) from National Cancer Institute’s Health Information National Trends Survey, 2011–2017, including cancer screening (colorectal, breast, cervical, prostate) among eligible participants and cancer fatalism. These data were linked to county-level metropolitan status/rurality (US Department of Agriculture) and racial segregation (US Census). We conducted multivariable analyses of associations of geographic variables with screening and fatalism.ResultsBreast cancer screening was lower in rural (92%, SE=1.5%) than urban counties (96%, SE=0.5%) (adjusted OR (aOR)=0.52, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.87). Colorectal cancer screening was higher in highly segregated (70%, SE=1.0%) than less segregated counties (65%, SE=1.7%) (aOR=1.28, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.58). Remaining outcomes did not vary by rurality or segregation, and these variables did not interact in their associations with screening or fatalism.ConclusionSimilar to previous studies, breast cancer screening was less common in rural areas. Contrary to expectations, colorectal cancer screening was higher in highly segregated counties. More research is needed on the influence of geography on cancer screening and beliefs, and how access to facilities or information may mediate these relationships.


2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522092259
Author(s):  
Iltaf Hussain ◽  
Abdul Majeed ◽  
Muhammad F Rasool ◽  
Musaddique Hussain ◽  
Imran Imran ◽  
...  

Introduction Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in the world and in Pakistan it ranks at fifth position. The present study was conducted to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, preventive practices and perceived barriers to screening about colorectal cancer among university students. Method A cross-sectional study was conducted after developing a self-administered questionnaire among the university students of newly merged districts of Kpk, Pakistan Result A total of 302 students (232 male and 70 female) participated in the study. The knowledge score of the participants regarding the risk factors and warning signs of colorectal cancer was 59.9% and 40%. More than 90% of the participants were of the view that colorectal cancer diagnosis at initial stages can improve treatment and around 80% were in favor of undergoing regular physical examination to avoid colorectal cancer. Only 37.7% of the participants had intentionally collected information about colorectal cancer. The percentage of participants who intentionally participated in educational activities related to colorectal cancer was 33.1%. Furthermore, only 24.4% of the participant had ever taken part in colorectal cancer screening. The barriers toward colorectal cancer screening were fear of finding colorectal cancer and the anxiety of screening procedures. However, around 32% of the participants had no knowledge about colorectal cancer screening. Conclusion In view of the findings of this study, it can be suggested that community awareness programs that are focused towards screening of colorectal cancer may be initiated in the newly merged districts of Kpk, Pakistan. The implementation of such colorectal cancer screening program can help in its early detection and can potentially lower the associated mortality and morbidity risk with this disease.


2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 127-131
Author(s):  
J. Lachter ◽  
O. Toledano ◽  
N. Saba-Khazen ◽  
A. Kuten ◽  
R. Epelbaum ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 409-416
Author(s):  
D. P. Staal ◽  
C. Vlooswijk ◽  
F. Mols ◽  
E. Lidington ◽  
W. T. A. van der Graaf ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Indira D. Tyler ◽  
Bertha L. Davis ◽  
Pamela V. Hammond ◽  
Barbara A. Cross ◽  
Phyllis D. Morgan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document