Novel fusion strategies for continuous interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy information: a case study in quality assessment of SmartWatch appearance design

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Yang ◽  
Zhen-Song Chen ◽  
Rosa M. Rodríguez ◽  
Witold Pedrycz ◽  
Kwai-Sang Chin
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Fuzzy Information ◽  
Appearance Design ◽  
Interval Valued

Surface Water Quality Assessment. Case Study: Târnava Mare River, Mediaș Town-Romania

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 70-72
Author(s):  
Cristina Roşu ◽  
◽  
Ioana Piştea ◽  
Carmen Roba ◽  
Mihaela Mihu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Surface Water ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Surface Water Quality ◽  
Water Quality Assessment

Relationships between physico-chemical, biological and functional approaches for soil quality assessment. A case study along a gradient of disturbance

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. 103300
Author(s):  
Pusanisa Heepngoen ◽  
Alexis Thoumazeau ◽  
Marie-Sophie Renevier ◽  
Kannika Sajjaphan ◽  
Frédéric Gay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Soil Quality ◽  
Physico Chemical ◽  
Soil Quality Assessment

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Fuzzy MCGDM Methodologies for Optimal Robot Selection Process

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 839
Author(s):  
Tabasam Rashid ◽  
Asif Ali ◽  
Juan Guirao ◽  
Adrián Valverde
Keyword(s):  
Selection Process ◽  
Industrial Robot ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Fuzzy Information ◽  
Criteria Weights ◽  
Topsis Technique ◽  
Fuzzy Weights ◽  
Robot Selection ◽  
Interval Valued

The generalized interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy best-worst method (GITrF-BWM) provides more reliable and more consistent criteria weights for multiple criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problems. In this study, GITrF-BWM is integrated with the extended TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution) and extended VIKOR (visekriterijumska optimizacija i kompromisno resenje) methods for the selection of the optimal industrial robot using fuzzy information. For a criteria-based selection process, assigning weights play a vital role and significantly affect the decision. Assigning weights based on direct opinions of decision makers can be biased, so weight deriving models, such as GITrF-BWM, overcome this discrepancy. In previous studies, generalized interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy weights were not derived by using any MCGDM method for the robot selection process. For this study, both subjective and objective criteria are considered. The preferences of decision makers are provided with the help of linguistic terms that are then converted into fuzzy information. The stability and reliability of the methods were tested by performing sensitivity analysis, which showed that the ranking results of both the methodologies are not symmetrical, and the integration of GITrF-BWM with the extended TOPSIS method provides stable and reliable results as compared to the integration of GITrF-BWM with the extended VIKOR method. Hence, the proposed methodology provides robust optimal industrial robot selection.

Multi-criteria decision-making algorithm based on aggregation operators under the complex interval-valued q-rung orthopair uncertain linguistic information

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Harish Garg ◽  
Zeeshan Ali ◽  
Zaoli Yang ◽  
Tahir Mahmood ◽  
Sultan Aljahdali
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Score Function ◽  
Aggregation Operators ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Linguistic Features ◽  
Interval Numbers ◽  
Fundamental Properties ◽  
Interval Valued

The paper aims to present a concept of a Complex interval-valued q-rung orthopair uncertain linguistic set (CIVQROULS) and investigated their properties. In the presented set, the membership grades are considered in terms of the interval numbers under the complex domain while the linguistic features are added to address the uncertainties in the data. To further discuss more, we have presented the operation laws and score function for CIVQROULS. In addition to them, we present some averaging and geometric operators to aggregate the different pairs of the CIVQROULS. Some fundamental properties of the proposed operators are stated. Afterward, an algorithm for solving the decision-making problems is addressed based on the proposed operator using the CIVQROULS features. The applicability of the algorithm is demonstrated through a case study related to brain tumors and their effectiveness is compared with the existing studies.

Construction of H5-Index for Conference Ranking Indicator and its Correlation to ERA

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 2150011
Author(s):  
Worapan Kusakunniran ◽  
Thearith Ponn ◽  
Nuttapol Boonsom ◽  
Suwimol Wahakit ◽  
Kittikhun Thongkanchorn
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Analysis ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Computer Science ◽  
Strong Correlation ◽  
Moderate Correlation ◽  
Data Cleansing ◽  
Rule Based ◽  
Ranking Systems ◽  
Rule Based Approach

This paper develops the Scopus H5-Index rankings, using the field of computer science as a case study. The challenge begins with the inconsistency of conference names. The rule-based approach is invented to automatically clean up duplicate conferences and assign unique pseudo ID for each conference. This data cleansing process is applied on conference names retrieved from both Scopus and ERA/CORE, in order to share common pseudo IDs for the sake of correlation analysis. The proposed data cleansing process is validated using ERA 2010 and CORE 2018 as references and reports the very small errors of 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively. Then, the Scopus H5-Index 2006–2010 and Scopus H5-Index 2014–2018 rankings are constructed and compared with the existing ERA 2010 and CORE 2018 rankings, respectively. The results show that the correlation within the Scopus H5-Index rankings (i.e. Scopus H5-Index 2006–2010 and Scopus H5-Index 2014–2018) is at the top of the moderate correlation band, where the correlation within the ERA/CORE rankings (ERA 2010 and CORE 2018) is at the top of the strong correlation band. While the correlations across ranking systems (i.e. Scopus H5-Index 2006–2010 vs. ERA 2010, and Scopus H5-Index 2014–2018 vs. CORE 2018) are at the bottom and middle of the moderate correlation band. It can be said that the quality assessment using the Scopus H5-Index ranking is more dynamic and quickly up-to-date when compared with the ERA/CORE ranking. Also, these two ranking systems are moderately correlated with each other for both periods of 2010 and 2018.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document