A prospective comparative study of bedside index for assessing severity in acute pancreatitis, APACHE II and computed tomography severity index scoring in predicting outcome in acute pancreatitis

2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 473-478
Author(s):  
Arun Kumar Gupta ◽  
Samrat Raj ◽  
Poras Chaudhary ◽  
Chikkala K. Durga
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Predicting Outcome

Assessing the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis with CT Severity Index and Other Conventional Methods in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Tamil Nadu, India – A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (41) ◽  
pp. 3541-3546
Author(s):  
Jayaprakash Subramani ◽  
Rajesh Prabhu ◽  
Jagadeesapandian Palpandi
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Male Predominance

BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis is not uncommon in surgical practice with variable clinical presentation. Because of its potential notable catastrophic complications, it is mandatory to assess the severity at the earliest. In recent times, the decision making in the management is quite difficult due to its complications and outcome. So, an objective assessment of severity based on clinical and laboratory scoring verses computed tomography (CT) severity is still debate, hence the need for study. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency of CT severity index verses APACHE II and Ranson criteria in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. METHODS A total number of 36 consecutive cases of acute pancreatitis who were admitted between January 2013 and December 2014 in Apollo Specialty Hospitals – Madurai were included in the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. RESULTS In our study, out of 36 patients, 30 (83.33 %) were males and 6 (16.66 %) were females. The sex distribution shows a clear male predominance. Most of the patients in the present study belonged to the middle age group. Alcohol was the most common cause accounting for 41.7 % of the cases followed by the billiary pathology. CT severity index was the superior tool for prediction of the prognosis and early complications. CONCLUSIONS When using contrast enhanced computed tomography, it was found that there was a significant correlation between the development of organ failure and severity of pancreatitis. The specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of Ranson and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation – II (APACHE II) at 48 hours of admission with acute pancreatitis does not correlate in determining the severity of acute pancreatitis. KEYWORDS Acute Pancreatitis, Severity Markers, CT Severity Index

Balthazar Computed Tomography Severity Index Is Superior to Ranson Criteria and APACHE II and III Scoring Systems in Predicting Acute Pancreatitis Outcome

2003 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantinos Chatzicostas ◽  
Maria Roussomoustakaki ◽  
Emmanouel Vardas ◽  
John Romanos ◽  
Elias A. Kouroumalis
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Apache Ii

Advantages of Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index of Acute Pancreatitis Over Other Scoring System

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-113
Author(s):  
Md Mofazzal Sharif ◽  
Khaleda Parvin Rekha ◽  
Umme Iffat Siddiqua ◽  
Mst Monira Khatun ◽  
AKM Enamul Haque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Observer Variation ◽  
Imaging Method ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Prompt Treatment

Pancreatitis is one of most complex and clinically challenging of all abdominal disorders. USG and abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) are the most commonly used diagnostic imaging modalities for the evaluation of pancreas. Computed Tomography (CT) is highly accurate and sensitive than USG in both diagnosing as well as demonstrating the extent. Early assessment of the cause and severity of acute pancreatitis is of utmost importance for prompt treatment and close monitoring of patient with severe disease. CT is the imaging method of choice for assessing the extent of acute pancreatitis and for evaluating complications. CT severity index is used to assess prognostic correlation and clinical outcome of acute pancreatitis. Modified CT severity index makes the score easier to calculate and reduces the inter-observer variation. KYAMC Journal Vol. 10, No.-2, July 2019, Page 110-113

3D Biometrics for Hindfoot Alignment Using Weightbearing Computed Tomography

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 720-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Zhong Zhang ◽  
François Lintz ◽  
Alessio Bernasconi ◽  
Shu Zhang ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Hindfoot Alignment ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study

Background: Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) is a useful tool for the assessment of hindfoot alignment (HA). Foot ankle offset (FAO) is a recently introduced parameter, determined from WBCT images using semiautomatic software. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical relevance and reproducibility of FAO for the evaluation of HA. Methods: A prospective comparative study was performed on consecutive patients requiring bilateral WBCT between September 2017 and April 2018. Based on the clinical assessment of HA, patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) normal alignment group (G1), (2) valgus (G2), and (3) varus (G3). FAO and long axial view (HACT) were measured on WBCT images, and the groups were compared. The reproducibility of FAO and HACT was determined through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Regression analysis was performed to investigate the correlation between the 2 methods. Overall, 249 feet (126 patients) were included (G1 = 115, G2 = 78, and G3 = 56 feet). Results: The mean values for FAO and HACT were 1.2% ± 2.8% and 3.9 ± 3.1, respectively, in G1; 8.1% ± 3.7% and 9.7 ± 4.9 in G2; and −6.6% ± 4.8% and −8.2 ± 6.6 in G3. Intra- and interobserver reliability was 0.987 and 0.988 for FAO and 0.949 and 0.949 for HACT, respectively. There was a good linear correlation between HACT and FAO ( R2 = 0.744), with a regression slope of 1.064. Conclusions: WBCT was a useful method for the characterization of HA. FAO was reproducible and correlated well with physical examination. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document