scholarly journals Parenteral Versus Oral Iron for Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anaemia During Pregnancy and post-partum: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Radhika ◽  
Aparna Kandala Sharma ◽  
Vanamail Perumal ◽  
Anju Sinha ◽  
Vasumathi Sriganesh ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 211 (8) ◽  
pp. 367-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Qassim ◽  
Rosalie M Grivell ◽  
Amanda Henry ◽  
Giselle Kidson‐Gerber ◽  
Antonia Shand ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingquan Shi ◽  
Wenying Leng ◽  
Romel Wazir ◽  
Jinhong Li ◽  
Qiang Yao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hafid O. Al-Hassi ◽  
Oliver Ng ◽  
Rayko Evstatiev ◽  
Manel Mangalika ◽  
Natalie Worton ◽  
...  

AbstractOral iron promotes intestinal tumourigenesis in animal models. In humans, expression of iron transport proteins are altered in colorectal cancer. This study examined whether the route of iron therapy alters iron transport and tumour growth. Colorectal adenocarcinoma patients with pre-operative iron deficiency anaemia received oral ferrous sulphate (n = 15), or intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (n = 15). Paired (normal and tumour tissues) samples were compared for expression of iron loading, iron transporters, proliferation, apoptosis and Wnt signalling using immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR. Iron loading was increased in tumour and distributed to the stroma in intravenous treatment and to the epithelium in oral treatment. Protein and mRNA expression of proliferation and iron transporters were increased in tumours compared to normal tissues but there were no significant differences between the treatment groups. However, intravenous iron treatment reduced ferritin mRNA levels in tumours and replenished body iron stores. Iron distribution to non-epithelial cells in intravenous iron suggests that iron is less bioavailable to tumour cells. Therefore, intravenous iron may be a better option in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients with iron deficiency anaemia due to its efficiency in replenishing iron levels while its effect on proliferation and iron metabolism is similar to that of oral iron treatment.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e021793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Bunch ◽  
Nia Roberts ◽  
Marian Knight ◽  
Manisha Nair

ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review to investigate the safety of induction and/or augmentation of labour compared with spontaneous-onset normal labour among pregnant women with iron-deficiency anaemia.DesignSystematic review.SettingStudies from all countries, worldwide.PopulationPregnant women with iron-deficiency anaemia at labour and delivery.InterventionAny intervention related to induction and/or augmentation of labour.Outcome measuresPrimary: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), heart failure and maternal death. Secondary: Emergency caesarean section, hysterectomy, admission to intensive care unit.MethodWe searched 10 databases, including Medline and Embase, from database inception to 1 October 2018. We included all study designs except cross-sectional studies without a comparator group, case reports, case series, ecological studies, and expert opinion. The searches were conducted by a healthcare librarian and two authors independently screened and reviewed the studies. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approachto ascertain risk of bias and conducted a narrative synthesis.ResultsWe identified 3217 journal articles, 223 conference papers, 45 dissertations and 218 registered trials. Ten articles were included for full-text review and only one was found to fulfil the eligibility criteria. This was a retrospective cohort study from India, which showed that pregnant women with moderate and severe anaemia could have an increased risk of PPH if they underwent induction and/or augmentation of labour, but the evidence was weak (graded as ‘high risk of bias’).ConclusionThe best approach is to prevent anaemia, but a large number of women in low-to-middle-income countries present with severe anaemia during labour. In such women, appropriate peripartum management could prevent complications and death. Our review showed that at present we do not know if induction and augmentation of labour is safe in pregnant women with iron-deficiency anaemia and further research is required.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42015032421.


1966 ◽  
Vol 4 (25) ◽  
pp. 100-100

A surprisingly high proportion of patients do not take the drugs prescribed for them,1 and failure of iron deficiency anaemia to respond to oral iron is often due to failure to take the medication. An experienced observer can often tell from the appearance of the stools whether a patient is taking iron, but a simple objective confirmatory test may be needed. Such a test has recently been described.2


Author(s):  
Neelima Agarwal ◽  
Preeti Sharma

Background: Postpartum iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is common in women. Most women are treated with either oral iron supplementation or blood transfusion. Hence, the aim of our study was to compare the effect of treatment with either oral ferrous sulphate or intravenous ferrous sucrose on postpartum IDA.Methods: 100 postpartum women with proven iron deficiency anaemia with hemoglobin <9gm/dl and serum ferritin <15 µgm/l were included in the study. They were randomized to receive either oral ferrous sulphate 200 mg twice daily for 6 weeks (group 1) or intravenous ferrous sucrose 200 mg, two to three doses given on alternate days (group 2). Total iron deficit was calculated using a standard formula. Target hemoglobin was 11 gm/dl. Results were analysed by the students t-test and chi-square test. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, red cell indices and ferritin were measured on day 2-3, 1-2 weeks and 6 weeks postpartumResults: By 1-2 weeks, hemoglobin level in women treated with intravenous iron had risen from 7.81±0.849 to 9.88±0.760 gm/dl which was more than those treated with oral iron (p<0.01); although by 6 weeks, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Ferritin levels rose rapidly in those treated with intravenous iron and remained significantly higher than in those treated with oral iron (p<0.01).Conclusions: Intravenous iron sucrose increases the hemoglobin level more rapidly than oral ferrous sulphate in women with postpartum IDA. It also replenishes iron stores more rapidly. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document