scholarly journals Persisting bark beetle outbreak indicates the unsustainability of secondary Norway spruce forests: case study from Central Europe

2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 481-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomáš Hlásny ◽  
Marek Turčáni
2017 ◽  
Vol 136 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 1013-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomáš Hlásny ◽  
Ivan Barka ◽  
Joerg Roessiger ◽  
Ladislav Kulla ◽  
Jiří Trombik ◽  
...  

Ecography ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 1426-1435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Marini ◽  
Bjørn Økland ◽  
Anna Maria Jönsson ◽  
Barbara Bentz ◽  
Allan Carroll ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 1907-1914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magda Jonášová ◽  
Ivona Matějková

An extensive area of Norway spruce ( Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forests in the Šumava Mountains, Central Europe, has been affected by a massive bark beetle ( Ips typographus L.) outbreak since the mid-1990s. One part of the area was left without intervention and two types of intervention have been applied in other parts: (1) the classical forest approach, based on the logging of attacked trees and (2) “sanitation”, in which attacked trees were cut down, debarked, and left lying in the stand. The main goal of our research was to test the impact of nonintervention and both types of intervention on the regeneration of the Norway spruce forests. The Norway spruce forests influenced by natural disturbances (bark beetle outbreak and windfalls) regenerated very well if left without intervention. The bark beetle outbreaks and windfalls do not represent a threat to the long-term persistence of the forests. Clearcuts resulted in formation of pioneer stages with a postponed spruce regeneration. In sanitation plots, the reduction of both previous vegetation and tree regeneration was obvious. Generally, both interventions against bark beetle delayed the recovery of Norway spruce forests.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Bottero ◽  
David I. Forrester ◽  
Maxime Cailleret ◽  
Ulrich Kohnle ◽  
Arthur Gessler ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 262 (12) ◽  
pp. 2151-2161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomáš Hlásny ◽  
Štěpán Křístek ◽  
Jaroslav Holuša ◽  
Jiří Trombik ◽  
Naděžda Urbaňcová

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimír Šebeň ◽  
Bohdan Konôpka ◽  
Michal Bošeľa ◽  
Jozef Pajtík

AbstractThe decline of spruce stands caused by bark beetle outbreaks is a serious economic and ecological problem of forestry in Slovakia. In the preceding period, the decline affected mainly secondary spruce forests. Over the last decade, due to large bark-beetle outbreaks this problem has been observed also in natural spruce forests, even at high elevations. We dealt with this issue in a case study of short-term development of larch-spruce stands in the High Tatras (at a site called Štart). We compared the situation in the stand infested by bark beetles several years after the wind-throw in 2004 with the stand unaffected by bark beetles. We separately analysed the development of the mature (parent) stands and the regeneration. The results indicated that forest decline caused by bark beetles significantly depended on the stand structure (mainly tree species composition), which affected the period of stand disintegration. Mortality of spruce trees slowed down biomass accumulation (and thus carbon sequestration) in the forest ecosystem. In the new stand, pioneer tree species dominated (in the conditions of the High Tatras it is primarily rowan), although their share in the parent stand was negligible. The results showed different trends in the accumulation of below-ground and above-ground biomass in the declined and living stands. In the first years after the stand decline, rowan accumulated significantly more biomass than the main tree species, i.e. spruce. The reverse situation was under the surviving stand, where spruce trees accumulated more biomass than rowan. The different share of spruce and pioneer tree species, mainly rowan, affected the ratio between fixed (in woody parts of trees) and rotating (in foliage) carbon in the undergrowth. Forest die-back is a big source of carbon emissions from dead individuals, and the compensation of these losses in the form of carbon sequestration by future stands is a matter of several decades.


2020 ◽  
Vol 474 ◽  
pp. 118360
Author(s):  
Zdeněk Vacek ◽  
Jan Cukor ◽  
Rostislav Linda ◽  
Stanislav Vacek ◽  
Václav Šimůnek ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 206 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 383-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupert Seidl ◽  
Peter Baier ◽  
Werner Rammer ◽  
Axel Schopf ◽  
Manfred J. Lexer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document