Ceftriaxone/disodium-edetate/sulbactam/colistin/rifampicin

2021 ◽  
Vol 1885 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-140
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Parag Sharma

ABSTRACTBronchiectasis is a type of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, defined as permanent abnormal dilation of bronchi due to vicious cycle of transmuralinfection and inflammation. Bronchiectasis is generally characterized by cough, wheeze, and dyspnea. Pathogens responsible for bronchiectasisinclude pathogens Haemophilus influenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and nontuberculousmycobacteria. Empirical antibiotic therapy and other drugs are used empirically in the management of bronchiectasis.Here, we discuss a case ofinfectious exacerbation of bronchiectasis successfully treated with an empirical use of ceftriaxone/sulbactam/disodium edetate-1034.Keywords: Bronchiectasis, Elores™, Ceftriaxone/sulbactam/disodium edetate-1034, Disodium edetate, Antibiotic resistance.


1982 ◽  
Vol 243 (3) ◽  
pp. G200-G203
Author(s):  
J. N. Hunt ◽  
P. R. McHugh

Disodium edetate (EDTA, 1 g/l) in test meals of water slowed gastric emptying strongly in one human and in four rhesus monkeys. When the binding sites of the EDTA were loaded with calcium before it was given in the test meal, there was little effect on gastric emptying. It is suggested that EDTA takes up calcium from the “tight junctions” of the duodenal epithelium. As a result a signal is set up that slows gastric emptying. It is postulated that the anions of fatty acids produced during the digestion of triglycerides in the duodenum also slow gastric emptying by the same mechanism. We explain how fats, carbohydrates, and proteins could all slow gastric emptying by operating on the same receptor.


2003 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toru Egashira ◽  
Kumiko Sakai ◽  
Mami Sakurai ◽  
Fusako Takayama

1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 1170-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Schnider ◽  
Charles F. Minto ◽  
Pedro L. Gambus ◽  
Corina Andresen ◽  
David B. Goodale ◽  
...  

Background Unresolved issues with propofol include whether the pharmacokinetics are linear with dose, are influenced by method of administration (bolus vs. infusion), or are influenced by age. Recently, a new formulation of propofol emulsion, containing disodium edetate (EDTA), was introduced in the United States. Addition of EDTA was found by the manufacturer to significantly reduce bacterial growth. This study investigated the influences of method of administration, infusion rate, patient covariates, and EDTA on the pharmacokinetics of propofol. Methods Twenty-four healthy volunteers aged 26-81 yr were given a bolus dose of propofol, followed 1 h later by a 60-min infusion. Each volunteer was randomly assigned to an infusion rate of 25, 50, 100, or 200 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Each volunteer was studied twice under otherwise identical circumstances: once receiving propofol without EDTA and once receiving propofol with EDTA. The influence of the method of administration and of the volunteer covariates was explored by fitting a three-compartment mamillary model to the data. The influence of EDTA was investigated by direct comparison of the measured concentrations in both sessions. Results The concentrations of propofol with and without EDTA were not significantly different. The concentration measurements after the bolus dose were significantly underpredicted by the parameters obtained just from the infusion data. The kinetics of propofol were linear within the infusion range of 25-200 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Age was a significant covariate for Volume2 and Clearance2, as were weight, height, and lean body mass for the metabolic clearance. Conclusions These results demonstrate that method of administration (bolus vs. infusion), but not EDTA, influences the pharmacokinetics of propofol. Within the clinically relevant range, the kinetics of propofol during infusions are linear regarding infusion rate.


1973 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray A. Johnstone ◽  
William R. Sullivan ◽  
W. Morton Grant

Spinal Cord ◽  
1963 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sedgwick Mead ◽  
Harvey D Cain ◽  
Robert E Kelly ◽  
Howard Liebgold
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document