Transcriptome profiling analysis of two contrasting barley genotypes in general combining ability for yield traits

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Chen ◽  
Bin Zhao ◽  
Changhao Ji ◽  
Bin Zhu ◽  
Rui Wang
Keyword(s):  
Combining Ability ◽  
Transcriptome Profiling ◽  
General Combining Ability ◽  
Yield Traits ◽  
Profiling Analysis ◽  
Barley Genotypes

scholarly journals Transcriptome profiling analysis for two Tibetan wild barley genotypes in responses to low nitrogen

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Quan ◽  
Jianbin Zeng ◽  
Lingzhen Ye ◽  
Guang Chen ◽  
Zhigang Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wild Barley ◽  
Transcriptome Profiling ◽  
Tibetan Wild Barley ◽  
Low Nitrogen ◽  
Profiling Analysis ◽  
Barley Genotypes

COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS AND INTERRELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THORNINESS AND YIELD TRAITS IN GOOSEBERRY

1970 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 439-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. P. S. SPANGELO ◽  
C. S. HSU ◽  
S. O. FEJER ◽  
R. WATKINS
Keyword(s):  
Plant Height ◽  
Combining Ability ◽  
General Combining Ability ◽  
Fruit Yield ◽  
Yield Traits ◽  
Genetic Barrier ◽  
Berry Weight ◽  
Combining Ability Analysis ◽  
Positive Correlations ◽  
One Year

Combining ability and interrelationships among four characters were studied in six gooseberry (Ribes grossularia) progenies produced by crossing each of two thornless to three large-fruited cultivars. Measurements were recorded for four consecutive years for fruit yield and 100-berry weight, and for one year for thorniness and plant height. General and specific combining abilities were significant and their interactions with years were not significant for fruit yield and berry weight, and general combining ability was significant for thorniness. Genotypic correlations agreed closely with the phenotypic correlations. Significant positive correlations were obtained between fruit yield with berry weight and plant height. The nonsignificant correlations between thorniness with fruit yield, berry weight and plant height suggest no genetic barrier to combining thornlessness with these traits.

Global transcriptome profiling analysis reveals insight into saliva-responsive genes in alfalfa

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 561-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenxian Liu ◽  
Zhengshe Zhang ◽  
Shuangyan Chen ◽  
Lichao Ma ◽  
Hucheng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptome Profiling ◽  
Global Transcriptome ◽  
Profiling Analysis ◽  
Insight Into

scholarly journals Genetic Dissection of the General Combining Ability of Yield-Related Traits in Maize

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Lu ◽  
Zhiqiang Zhou ◽  
Zhaohui Yuan ◽  
Chaoshu Zhang ◽  
Zhuanfang Hao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combining Ability ◽  
General Combining Ability ◽  
Genetic Dissection

HETEROSIS, COMBINING ABILITY, AND PREDICTED SYNTHETICS FROM A DIALLEL CROSS IN SUNFLOWERS (HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.)

1966 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric D. Putt
Keyword(s):  
Helianthus Annuus ◽  
Combining Ability ◽  
Oil Content ◽  
Diallel Cross ◽  
General Combining Ability ◽  
Specific Combining Ability ◽  
Helianthus Annuus L ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Seed Characters ◽  
Mature Weight

Heterosis occurred for the eight plant and seed characters studied. It was most frequent for yield of seed and height of plant. Mean squares for general combining ability (gca) and specific combining ability (sca) were significant (P =.01) for all characters. The estimated components for gca were greater than for sca for days to mature, weight per bushel, and percent oil in the seed; less for height and yield of seed; and essentially the same for days to bloom, diameter of head, and weight per 1000 seeds.The yield of seed and percent oil in the seed, for the highest ranking 100 synthetics that could be composed from the 10 lines, was predicted in F6 assuming 50 and 60% outcrossing between F2 and F6. Virtually all values exceeded the mean performance of four check samples of commercial hybrids. Many exceeded the highest rank check for oil content in the seed. Fourteen of the highest ranking 100 synthetics for yield and 30 for oil content consisted of two or three lines. It was concluded that synthetics can be superior to the present hybrids in heterosis and that desirable synthetics can be made from only a few lines.

HETEROSIS IN DIALLEL CROSSES AMONG SIX VARIETIES OF HARD RED SPRING WHEAT

1969 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 810-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Knott ◽  
S. S. Sindagi
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Combining Ability ◽  
General Combining Ability ◽  
Specific Combining Ability ◽  
Diallel Crosses ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat

Diallel crosses were made among six varieties of hard red spring wheat that differed considerably in yield and other characteristics. The F1 hybrids were tested at two seeding rates and the F2, hybrids at one. Heterosis was not great in either generation and no cross appeared to be promising. General combining ability was much more important than specific combining ability and parental yields gave reasonable predictions of hybrid yields. Yields of hybrids at the two seeding rates were closely correlated.

scholarly journals Association between Griffing's diallel and the adaptability and stability of Eberhart and Russel

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cleso Antônio Patto Pacheco ◽  
Cosme Damião Cruz ◽  
Manoel Xavier dos Santos
Keyword(s):  
Combining Ability ◽  
General Combining Ability ◽  
Genetic Effects ◽  
Specific Combining Ability ◽  
Regression Coefficients ◽  
Stability Parameters ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Additive Genetic Effects ◽  
F1 Cross

The objective of the present work was to provide a methodology to study the inheritance of adaptability and stability through the breakdown of Eberhart and Russell regression coefficients and regression deviations in effects due to the mean and additive genetic effects (gi's and gj's) as well as dominance effects (sij's) of Griffing´s methodology, when the diallel is conducted in several environments. It was concluded that the adaptability and stability parameters are determined in the same manner as are genetic effects. So an F1 cross inherits half the general combining ability (GCA) mean effect from each parent, while the effects due to specific combining ability (SCA) are subjected to the same considerations relative to sij's, i.e., they are dependent on specific combinations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document