Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: A retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients

1977 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Nortjé ◽  
A.G. Farman ◽  
F.W. Grotepass
2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janisha Vengalath ◽  
JaishankarHomberhalli Puttabuddi ◽  
Balakrishnan Rajkumar ◽  
GanigaChannaiah Shivakumar

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-62
Author(s):  
Nagihan Koc ◽  
Elif Ballikaya ◽  
Zafer Cavit Cehreli

Objective: To determine the prevalence and distribution of premature eruption and agenesis of premolars in a sample of Turkish children. Study design: A sample of 1715 patients aged 5 to 11 years was selected. Panoramic radiographs were used to assess premature eruption and agenesis of premolars. Developmental stage of erupted premolars was assessed using Demirjian’s method and selecting prematurely erupted premolars on the basis of clinical eruption with a root length less than half of their final expected root lengths. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test (p <.05). Results: One hundred fifteen (6.7%) of 1715 patients presented at least one premolar agenesis with no significant sex difference (56 boys, 59 girls). Mandibular second premolars were the most absent teeth. Multiple agenesis of premolars (3.4%) was more common than single agenesis (3.3%). A total of 85 (5.0%) patients (51 boys, 34 girls; no significant sex difference) had at least one prematurely erupted premolar, and maxillary first premolars were most commonly affected. Early erupted premolars were in stage D or E based on Demirjian’s dental formation scale. Conclusions: The prevalence of premature eruption and agenesis of premolars in Turkish children were 5.0% and 6.7%, respectively. Both conditions are not uncommon and may highlight the need for early diagnosis to prevent subsequent clinical problems.


2014 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Newton Guerreiro da Silva Júnior ◽  
Erick Nelo Pedreira ◽  
Fabrício Mesquita Tuji ◽  
Luiza Verônica Warmling ◽  
Karem L. Ortega

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 20150296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahogany S Miles ◽  
Edwin T Parks ◽  
George J Eckert ◽  
Steven B Blanchard

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Kratz ◽  
Joanne N. Walton ◽  
Michael I. MacEntee ◽  
Caroline T. Nguyen ◽  
David MacDonald

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-77
Author(s):  
Gözde Serindere ◽  
Ceren Aktuna Belgin

Objective: Mandibular canal, mandibular foramen, mental foramen and insisiv canal are so important anatomical structures for dental surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the visibility of these important landmarks in different age groups and to compare the visibility in dentulous group with edentulous group on panoramic radiographs. Methods: The panoramic radiographs of 500 patients (237 males; 263 females; mean age; 39.2) were evaluated for this study. The visibility of anatomical landmarks were analyzed in the radiographs and scores were noted. The data obtained in this study were analyzed by SPSS 21 package program. The value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.  Results: Out of 500 radiographs, mandibular canal, mandibular foramen, mental foramen and incisive canal was visible in 89.8%, 88%, 80.6% and 12.8%, respectively. 23 (4.6%) patients had total tooth loss. The visibility of the anatomical landmarks was observed in groups below 25 years old. Conclusion: Panoramic radiographs provide useful information on the visibility of anatomical landmarks. However, the use of 3D imaging methods before surgical procedures will give more accurate results.   How to cite this article: Serindere G, Aktuna Belgin C. The evaluation of visibility of mandibular anatomic landmarks using panoramic radiography. Int Dent Res 2019;9(2):69-77.   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document