Can the molecular staggering angle be determined from a single diffraction pattern?

1989 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 985-988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Ahn Song ◽  
D.J. Barber
2009 ◽  
Vol 94 (10) ◽  
pp. 101112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Kohmura ◽  
Kei Sawada ◽  
Munetaka Taguchi ◽  
Tetsuya Ishikawa ◽  
Takuji Ohigashi ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 16650 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Martin ◽  
F. Wang ◽  
N. D. Loh ◽  
T. Ekeberg ◽  
F. R. N. C. Maia ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 664-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.D. Specht ◽  
A. Goyal ◽  
W. Liu

Polychromatic synchrotron x-ray microdiffraction is used to determine the epitaxy of YBa2Cu3Ox (YBCO) films grown on polycrystalline Y.15Zr.85O1.925/CeO2/Y2O3/Ni95W5(Ni) rolling-assisted, biaxially textured substrates (RABiTS). A novel analysis technique is introduced in which the orientation of mosaic films is measured by using a Hough transform to recognize arcs in Laue microdiffraction patterns that correspond to low-index zone axes. While the overall epitaxy is cube-on-cube, grain-by-grain analysis reveals a systematic misorientation of YBCO with respect to Ni: the YBCO [001] rotates toward the direction of the surface normal. The crystal mosaic (for rotation about the rolling direction) measured by a single diffraction pattern sampling a 0.5-μm2 surface area is 0.7° full width at half-maximum for YBCO grown on Ni grains with a low tilt; for more highly tilted grains, the YBCO patterns can no longer be measured, presumably due to the large mosaic. The YBCO mosaic over the entire area of a Ni grain is ∼2.5° and varies with grain size; the mosaic is smaller for larger grains.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 722-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Skopintsev ◽  
A. Singer ◽  
J. Bach ◽  
L. Müller ◽  
B. Beyersdorff ◽  
...  

A method to characterize the spatial coherence of soft X-ray radiation from a single diffraction pattern is presented. The technique is based on scattering from non-redundant arrays (NRAs) of slits and records the degree of spatial coherence at several relative separations from 1 to 15 µm, simultaneously. Using NRAs the spatial coherence of the X-ray beam at the XUV X-ray beamline P04 of the PETRA III synchrotron storage ring was measured as a function of different beam parameters. To verify the results obtained with the NRAs, additional Young's double-pinhole experiments were conducted and showed good agreement.


Author(s):  
J. B. Warren

Electron diffraction intensity profiles have been used extensively in studies of polycrystalline and amorphous thin films. In previous work, diffraction intensity profiles were quantitized either by mechanically scanning the photographic emulsion with a densitometer or by using deflection coils to scan the diffraction pattern over a stationary detector. Such methods tend to be slow, and the intensities must still be converted from analog to digital form for quantitative analysis. The Instrumentation Division at Brookhaven has designed and constructed a electron diffractometer, based on a silicon photodiode array, that overcomes these disadvantages. The instrument is compact (Fig. 1), can be used with any unmodified electron microscope, and acquires the data in a form immediately accessible by microcomputer.Major components include a RETICON 1024 element photodiode array for the de tector, an Analog Devices MAS-1202 analog digital converter and a Digital Equipment LSI 11/2 microcomputer. The photodiode array cannot detect high energy electrons without damage so an f/1.4 lens is used to focus the phosphor screen image of the diffraction pattern on to the photodiode array.


Author(s):  
Glen B. Haydon

Analysis of light optical diffraction patterns produced by electron micrographs can easily lead to much nonsense. Such diffraction patterns are referred to as optical transforms and are compared with transforms produced by a variety of mathematical manipulations. In the use of light optical diffraction patterns to study periodicities in macromolecular ultrastructures, a number of potential pitfalls have been rediscovered. The limitations apply to the formation of the electron micrograph as well as its analysis.(1) The high resolution electron micrograph is itself a complex diffraction pattern resulting from the specimen, its stain, and its supporting substrate. Cowley and Moodie (Proc. Phys. Soc. B, LXX 497, 1957) demonstrated changing image patterns with changes in focus. Similar defocus images have been subjected to further light optical diffraction analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document