Effects of selection agent and leader origin on leader influence and group member perceptions

1980 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Knight ◽  
Howard M. Weiss
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan S. Chiaburu ◽  
Troy A. Smith ◽  
Jiexin Wang ◽  
Ryan D. Zimmerman

We meta-analytically examine the relationships between three forms of leader influence, contingent reward (transactional), leader-member exchange (LMX; relational), and transformational (change-oriented) on subordinates’ proactive behaviors. Using non-self-reported data from a combined sample of more than 9,000 employees, we confirm positive relationships between leader influences and employee proactive outcomes. We examine the extent to which one leadership influence is stronger than the others in promoting subordinate proactivity. By combining our new meta-analytic data with existing meta-analytic correlations, we further investigate the extent to which various leadership predictors are differentially related to proactive and prosocial contextual performance, and to task performance. For all outcomes, there are only minimal differences between the contingent reward, LMX, and transformational leadership predictors. Using our results, we propose future research directions for the relationship between leader influences and subordinate work effectiveness.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Martin Kivlighan ◽  
Gianluca Lo Coco ◽  
Salvatore Gullo ◽  
Chiara Pazzagli ◽  
Claudia Mazzeschi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
pp. 114-131
Author(s):  
O. Yu. Bondarenko

his article explores theoretical and experimental approach to modeling social interactions. Communication and exchange of information with other people affect individual’s behavior in numerous areas. Generally, such influence is exerted by leaders, outstanding individuals who have a higher social status or expert knowledge. Social interactions are analyzed in the models of social learning, game theoretic models, conformity models, etc. However, there is a lack of formal models of asymmetric interactions. Such models could help elicit certain qualities characterizing higher social status and perception of status by other individuals, find the presence of leader influence and analyze its mechanism.


Author(s):  
Jeffrey Dunn

Free riding occurs in the practical domain when some action is rational for each group member to perform but such that when everyone performs that action, it is worse overall for everyone. Dunn argues that some surprising empirical evidence about group problem-solving reveals that groups will often face cases where it is epistemically best for each individual to believe one thing, even though this is ultimately epistemically worse for the group that each member believes in this way. Dunn’s work is thus an extension of work on the division of cognitive labor and ways that group inquiry might differ from individual inquiry.


2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin S. Hagger ◽  
Panagiotis Rentzelas ◽  
Severine Koch
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document