Eutypine, a phytotoxin produced by Eutypa lata the causal agent of dying-arm disease of grapevine

1991 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 471-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Tey-Rulh ◽  
Isabelle Philippe ◽  
Jean-Marc Renaud ◽  
Georges Tsoupras ◽  
Pascal de Angelis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Wenneker ◽  
Marcel M. J. P. van Raak ◽  
Ilse R. van Brouwershaven ◽  
Wendy Martin ◽  
Linda F. F. Kox

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. E. Rolshausen ◽  
N. E. Mahoney ◽  
R. J. Molyneux ◽  
W. D. Gubler

Eutypa dieback is a vascular disease of several cultivated crops and trees worldwide. The attribution of the name to the agent responsible for branch dieback is ambiguous. Pathogenicity of Eutypa sp. first was reported on apricot and the causal agent was named E. armeniacae. However, no morphological differences were reported with the previously described E. lata, and some authors considered both species synonymous. Others regarded them as distinct species on the basis of pathogenesis and molecular analysis. We further investigated the relatedness of both species by phylogenetic analyses of the internal transcribed spacer region and β-tubulin gene. These analyses included several other taxa placed in the same family (Diatrypaceae), and yielded three groups. The isolates referred to as E. lata in previous work clustered with Diatrype stigma in one group. Isolates of E. armeniacae and E. lata clustered in a second group, supporting the synonymy of these species. The third group included other Eutypa spp. supporting the polyphyletic origin of this genus. Measurements of conidia length and secondary metabolite production of isolates supported the phylogenetic analyses. Secondary metabolites appeared to be a synapomorphic character shared by several taxa including E. lata, E. armeniacae, E. laevata, and E. petrakii var. petrakii.


Planta Medica ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (09) ◽  
Author(s):  
HMT Herath ◽  
WHMW Herath ◽  
SO Duke ◽  
M Tomaso-Peterson ◽  
NPD Nanayakkara

Planta Medica ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (09) ◽  
Author(s):  
JM Rollinger ◽  
R Spitaler ◽  
M Menz ◽  
P Schneider ◽  
EP Ellmerer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. Muntala ◽  
P. M. Norshie ◽  
K. G. Santo ◽  
C. K. S. Saba

A survey was conducted in twenty-five cashew (Anacardium occidentale) orchards in five communities in the Dormaa-Central Municipality of Bono Region of Ghana to assess the incidence and severity of anthracnose, gummosis and die-back diseases on cashew. Cashew diseased samples of leaves, stem, inflorescences, twigs, flowers, nuts and apples showing symptoms (e. g. small, water-soaked, circular or irregular yellow, dark or brown spots or lesions on leaves, fruits and flowers, sunken surface, especially on the apples, blight, gum exudates) were collected for isolation of presumptive causative organism. The pathogen was isolated after disinfecting the excised diseased pieces in 70% ethanol, plated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubated at 28 oC for 3 to 7 days. The identity of the putative pathogen was morphologically and culturally confirmed as belonging to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex using standard mycological identification protocols. The pathogen had varied conidia sizes of between 9-15 up to 20 μm in length and diameter of 3-6 μm. The conidia were straight and cylindrically shaped with rounded or obtuse ends. The septate mycelium was whitish-grey, velvety and cotton-like in appearance from the top. The results confirmed the presence of the pathogen in the orchards with incidence ranging from 6.9% and 14.0% for gummosis and averaged 22.9% for anthracnose infected orchards. The result of the pathogenicity test confirmed the isolates to be pathogenic on inoculated cashew seedlings and were consistently re-isolated, thereby establishing the pathogen as the true causal agent of the said diseases in cashew trees and thus completed the Koch’s postulate.


Author(s):  
Mladen Petres ◽  
Marta Loc ◽  
Mila Grahovac ◽  
Vera Stojsin ◽  
Dragana Budakov ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (10) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
M. Musiienko ◽  
L. Batsmanova ◽  
Ju. Pys'menna ◽  
T. Kondratiuk ◽  
N. Taran ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susumu TAKAMATSU ◽  
Manami NAKANO ◽  
Hideyuki YOKOTA ◽  
Hitoshi KUNOH

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document