High dose methotrexate adjuvant therapy and resection to cure squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: Results

1988 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. M9
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 2409-2419
Author(s):  
Arslan Babar ◽  
Neil M. Woody ◽  
Ahmed I. Ghanem ◽  
Jillian Tsai ◽  
Neal E. Dunlap ◽  
...  

Adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), with high-dose cisplatin remains standard treatment for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with high-risk pathologic features. We evaluated outcomes associated with different cisplatin dosing and schedules, concurrent with radiation (RT), and the effect of cumulative dosing of cisplatin. An IRB-approved collaborative database of patients (pts) with primary OCSCC (Stage I–IVB AJCC 7th edition) treated with primary surgical resection between January 2005 and January 2015, with or without adjuvant therapy, was established from six academic institutions. Patients were categorized by cisplatin dose and schedule, and resultant groups compared for demographic data, pathologic features, and outcomes by statistical analysis to determine disease free survival (DFS) and freedom from metastatic disease (DM). From a total sample size of 1282 pts, 196 pts were identified with high-risk features who were treated with adjuvant CRT. Administration schedule of cisplatin was not significantly associated with DFS. On multivariate (MVA), DFS was significantly better in patients without perineural invasion (PNI) and in those receiving ≥200 mg/m2 cisplatin dose (p < 0.001 and 0.007). Median DFS, by cisplatin dose, was 10.5 (<200 mg/m2) vs. 20.8 months (≥200 mg/m2). Our analysis demonstrated cumulative cisplatin dose ≥200 mg/m2 was associated with improved DFS in high-risk resected OCSCC pts.


2022 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 103303
Author(s):  
Gaelen B. Stanford-Moore ◽  
Ana Marija Sola ◽  
Jason Chan ◽  
Ivan El-Sayed ◽  
Jonathan George ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. vii135
Author(s):  
Toshihiro Arai ◽  
Yoshihide Ota ◽  
Takayuki Aoki ◽  
Mitsunobu Otsuru

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18556-e18556
Author(s):  
Poornima Ramadas ◽  
Dongliang Wang ◽  
Danning Huang ◽  
Abirami Sivapiragasam

e18556 Background: Two trials followed by a combined analysis of the trials in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) established that the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy concurrent with radiation (CRT) was only noted in patients with extracapsular extension of nodal disease (ECE) and positive resection margins (PM). Despite this recommendation, other high-risk pathological features including pT3 or pT4 disease, positive lymph nodes, perineural involvement, vascular tumor embolism and level IV or V lymph node involvement have been noted to increase the risk of recurrence and adjuvant chemotherapy has been utilized for these patients. We report an observational study to evaluate the factors impacting use of CRT in patients with oral cavity and lip SCC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with oral cavity and lip SCC who underwent resection of primary tumor with or without neck dissection in the reporting hospital in the NCDB database. We compared demographic, clinical and pathological characteristics of patients who received adjuvant CRT versus radiation alone. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression model. Results: Out of the 58,481 patients reported to have surgery in NCDB from 2004 to 2016, 11,413 patients received adjuvant therapy. In univariate analysis, patients who received CRT were most likely less than 65 years of age, males, patients with no insurance or private insurance, lower Charlson Deyo score, Stage IVA, pT4, grade 2 or higher, tumor size > 4cm, positive lymph nodes, involvement of level IV and V nodes, lymphovascular invasion, ECE and PM. In multivariate analysis, factors which influenced receiving CRT were age between 40 and 65 years, males, Stage IVA (compared to Stage I to III), positive nodes, ECE and PM. A total of 984 patients received CRT without having ECE or PM. Conclusions: In addition to ECE and PM, positive lymph nodes was the major pathological factor in patients receiving CRT compared to RT alone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document