The combination of L-tryptophane, diet and behavioral modification for weight loss and pain control in chronic pain patients

Pain ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. S207
Author(s):  
R. Simonsen ◽  
E.G. Heinze ◽  
K.S. Lehman
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 378-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manasi M. Mittinty ◽  
John Lee ◽  
Amanda C. de C. Williams ◽  
Natasha Curran

AbstractBackground and aimsTo improve care and management of patients with chronic pain it is important to understand patients’ experiences of treatment, and of the people and the environment involved. As chronic pain patients often have long relationships with medical clinics and pain management centres, the team and team interactions with the patients could impact the treatment outcome. The aim of this study was to elicit as honest as possible an account of chronic pain patients’ experiences associated with their care and feed this information back to the clinical team as motivation for improvement.MethodsThe research was conducted at a large hospital-based pain management centre. One hundred consecutive patients aged 18 years and above, who had visited the centre at least once before, were invited to participate. Seventy patients agreed and were asked to write a letter, as if to a friend, describing the centre. On completion of the study, all letters were transcribed into NVivo software and a thematic analysis performed.ResultsSix key themes were identified: (i) staff attitude and behaviour; (ii) interactions with the physician; (iii) importance of a dedicated pain management centre; (iv) personalized care; (v) benefits beyond pain control; (vi) recommending the pain management centre.ConclusionThe findings suggest that the main reasons that patients recommended the centre were: (i) support and validation provided by the staff; (ii) provision of detailed information about the treatment choices available; (iii) personalized management plan and strategies to improve overall quality of life alongside pain control. None of the letters criticized the care provided, but eight of seventy reported long waiting times for the first appointment as a problem.ImplicationsPatient views are central to improving care. However, satisfaction questionnaires or checklists can be intimidating, and restrictive in their content, not allowing patients to offer spontaneous feedback. We used a novel approach of writing a letter to a friend, which encouraged reporting of uncensored views. The results of the study have encouraged the clinical team to pursue their patient management strategies and work to reduce the waiting time for a first appointment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Bacon ◽  
L Ivanitskaya ◽  
E Erzikova ◽  
T Veverka

Abstract Background Approximately 34.3 million people used prescription opioids for non-medical reasons globally in 2016. In addition, many of the 1.5 billion people worldwide who suffer from chronic pain use opioids. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 76% of overdose deaths are caused by prescription and non-prescription opioids. Opioid use disorder and addiction encompass many aspects; such as, economic forces, cultural forces and individual genetic makeup. Because of this complexity, policymakers will have to address chronic pain and social determinants of health. Understanding the public's perspectives on the opioid epidemic is critical for policymakers to create awareness and treatment programs to decrease opioid related deaths while treating pain. Methods This inductive, iterative approach to content analysis of secondary data collected 8,761 comments posted by viewers on ten videos regarding the opioid epidemic on CNN's YouTube Channel and ten videos on Fox News' YouTube channel posted between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. Results After analyzing 8,761 comments, from 20 videos, results indicated 618 (7%) were pain patients, 926 (10.6%) of the comments indicated stigma, (54.5% social stigma and 30% structural stigma). 5,453 (62.2%) of the comments posted claims regarding the opioid epidemic and 1,881 (21.5%) offered solutions. Three of the major solutions offered include legalizing cannabis (608, 7%), developing alternative therapies (174, 1.9%), and kratom (105, 1.2%). Conclusions Reducing access to opioids is harming legitimate pain patients. Policymakers need to take the public's opinions into consideration when developing policies and programs that help reduce opioid overdose. These policies must ensure that the 1.5 billion chronic pain patients worldwide receive adequate pain control in order to have a good quality of life that allows them to be contributing members of society. Key messages Worldwide, 1.5 billion people suffer from chronic pain, many without access to adequate pain control. Solutions posted by viewers include cannabis, alternative therapies and kratom. Understanding the public’s perspectives will help policymakers create programs that improve quality of life for chronic pain patients that minimize social, internalized and structural stigma.


2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid von Bueren Jarchow ◽  
Bogdan P. Radanov ◽  
Lutz Jäncke

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to examine to what extent chronic pain has an impact on various attentional processes. To measure these attention processes a set of experimental standard tests of the “Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung” (TAP), a neuropsychological battery testing different levels of attention, were used: alertness, divided attention, covert attention, vigilance, visual search, and Go-NoGo tasks. 24 chronic outpatients and 24 well-matched healthy control subjects were tested. The control subjects were matched for age, gender, and education. The group of chronic pain patients exhibited marked deficiencies in all attentional functions except for the divided attention task. Thus, the data supports the notion that chronic pain negatively influences attention because pain patients` attention is strongly captivated by the internal pain stimuli. Only the more demanding divided attention task has the capability to distract the focus of attention to the pain stimuli. Therefore, the pain patients are capable of performing within normal limits. Based on these findings chronic pain patients' attentional deficits should be appropriately evaluated and considered for insurance and work related matters. The effect of a successful distraction away from the pain in the divided attention task can also open new therapeutic aspects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document