Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer

Author(s):  
Richard D. Pezner ◽  
Mary P. Patterson ◽  
L.Robert Hill ◽  
Nayana Vora ◽  
Kanta R. Desai ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 57-66
Author(s):  
I. A. Akulova ◽  
S. N. Novikov ◽  
A. I. Tseluyko ◽  
A. V. Chernaya ◽  
Zh. V. Bryantseva ◽  
...  

Objective: to compare cosmetic result of two techniques of boost delivery to the tumor bed after breast concerving treatment.Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the results of treatment of patients with stage IA–IIIA breast cancer from three groups was carried out: 1) 45 women received tumor bed boost with interstitial brachytherapy; 2) 48 women with electrons (energies from 6 to 18 MeV); 3) 59 women did not receive additional irradiation of the removed tumor bed. The analysis of the cosmetic results of treatment was carried out using subjective and objective methods using mammographic data, including information about the most common complications from the skin, subcutaneous fat and remaining breast tissue, such as telangiectasias, fibrosis, and fatty necrosis.Results. According to the results of self-assessment by patients and assessment by independent expert (oncologist), carried out on a 4-point Harvard scale, the cosmetic result in most cases was characterized as “excellent” or “good”. Frequency and grade of telangiectasia were used for objective evaluation of skin complications and were similar in all 3 groups. The incidence of localized fibrosis also did not differ and was most often observed as absent or moderate (grade 1–2). There were no significant differences between the severity and incidence of fatty necrosis on both physical examinations and when it was evaluated on mammography.Conclusions. additional irradiation of the tumor bed does not compromise cosmetic result of the treatment. In most cases (57–78 %) estimated as “good” and “excellent”. The cosmetic result of the treatment does not depend on the technology of boost delivery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12508-e12508
Author(s):  
Rufus J. Mark ◽  
Valerie Gorman ◽  
Michal Wolski ◽  
Steven McCullough

e12508 Background: Randomized trials in stage 0-II breast cancer have proven that APBI given via HDR implant in 5 days is equivalent to whole breast irradiation (WBI) given in 5-6 weeks in regard to breast tumor local recurrence (LR). However, complications have been significant. Recently APBI using non-invasive IMRT given in 5 fractions has been shown in another randomized trial with 10 year follow-up to be equivalent to WBI in 6 weeks, with respect to LR. IMRT was superior in regard to acute effects, late effects, and cosmesis. In the randomized clinical trial of APBI IMRT, the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) was defined by the injection of individual fiducial markers bordering the surgical cavity. We have used the Biozorb fiducial system to localize the CTV for IMRT. We sought to confirm the APBI IMRT results with this simpler less labor intensive fiducial placement system. Methods: Between 2017 and 2021, 214 patients have undergone IMRT targeted to a Biozorb defined CTV with the walls of the surgical cavity sewn to the Biozorb device. Eligible patients were older than age 40, had tumor sizes < 3 cm, negative surgical margins, and negative sentinel node dissections. IMRT dose was 30 Gy given in 5 fractions. Dose Constraints were as follows : V-30 Gy < 105%, Ipsilateral Breast V-15 Gy < 50%, Ipsilateral Lung V-10 Gy < 20%, Contralateral Lung V-5 Gy < 10%, Heart V-3 Gy < 20%, Contralateral Breast Dmax < 2 Gy and Skin Dmax < 27 Gy. The Planning Target Volume (PTV) ranged from 27 to 355 cc with a median of 80 cc. PTV = CTV + 1-2 cm. Results: Follow-up ranged from 1-39 months with a median of 20 months. LR has been 0% (0/214). There have been no skin reactions or seromas. Infection has occurred in one patient (0.5%). Four (1.9%) patients developed pain around the Biozorb site. This resolved on a short courses of steroids in all cases. Cosmetic results as rated by the Surgeon, Radiation Oncologist, and Nurse, were rated excellent in 99.0% (212/214) of cases. Conclusions: Non-invasive APBI with IMRT given qd over 5 days targeted to Biozorb has resulted in LR, complications, and cosmetic results which compare favorably to invasive APBI given bid with HDR implant. At last follow-up, there have been no LR, skin reactions, or significant complications. Cosmesis has been excellent in 99.0% of patients.


The Breast ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 456-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria João Cardoso ◽  
Jaime Cardoso ◽  
Natália Amaral ◽  
Isabel Azevedo ◽  
Lise Barreau ◽  
...  

The Breast ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 640-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayada R. Bani ◽  
Kai Beckmann ◽  
Julia Engel ◽  
Michael P. Lux ◽  
Claudia Rauh ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Zamagni ◽  
A. Martoni ◽  
N. Cacciari ◽  
B. Bellanova ◽  
F. Vecchi ◽  
...  

CA-549 serum levels were assessed in 288 patients, 156 with early breast cancer (after surgery) and 132 with advanced breast cancer. CA-549 was abnormal (> 12 U/ml) in 25/156 patients (16%) without clinical signs of disease after surgery (median 9 U/ml), in 49/60 patients (82%) with disease in progression (P) (median 50 U/ml), in 19/27 patients (70%) with stationary disease (NC) (median 14 U/ml), in 25/33 patients (76%) with partial remission (PR) (median 18 U/ml) and in 4/12 patients (33%) with complete remission (CR) (median 9 U/ml). CA-549 serum levels correlated mainly with the extent of disease and secondarily with the prevalent metastatic site, higher values being observed in patients with visceral involvement (median 32.5 U/ml). CA-549 serum levels were also assessed in 51 patients at the start of treatment and at the time of objective evaluation: the results underline the concordance of CA-549 behavior with the clinical outcome in 71% of the cases. We conclude that CA-549 is a useful marker for monitoring breast cancer patients during the advanced stages of the disease.


2018 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. e53
Author(s):  
B. Joelle ◽  
S. Lavau-Denes ◽  
L. Pervieux ◽  
A. Labrunie ◽  
B. Marin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document