Bone Mineral Density of the Total Body and Forearm in Premenopausal Black and White Women

Bone ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 311S-315S ◽  
Author(s):  
S Harris
Bone ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. S311-S315 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.S. Harris ◽  
M.J. Wood ◽  
B. Dawson-Hughes

1997 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 429-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Ettinger ◽  
Stephen Sidney ◽  
Steven R. Cummings ◽  
Cesar Libanati ◽  
Daniel D. Bikle ◽  
...  

Abstract This study tested whether racial differences in bone density can be explained by differences in bone metabolism and lifestyle. A cohort of 402 black and white men and women, ages 25–36 yr, was studied at the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program in Northern California, a prepaid health plan. Body composition (fat, lean, and bone mineral density) was measured using a Hologic-2000 dual-energy x-ray densitometer. Muscle strength, blood and urine chemistry values related to calcium metabolism, bone turnover, growth factors, and level of sex and adrenal hormones were also measured. Medical history, physical activity, and lifestyle were assessed. Statistical analyses using t- and chi-square tests and multiple regression were done to determine whether racial difference in bone density remained after adjustment for covariates. Bone density at all skeletal sites was statistically significantly greater in black than in white subjects; on average, adjustment for covariates reduced the percentage density differences by 42% for men and 34% for women. Adjusted bone density at various skeletal sites was 4.5–16.1% higher for black than for white men and was 1.2–7.3% higher for black than for white women. We concluded that racial differences in bone mineral density are not accounted for by clinical or biochemical variables measured in early adulthood.


1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1043-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan S. Harris ◽  
T. ROSS Eccleshall ◽  
Coleman Gross ◽  
Bess Dawson-Hughes ◽  
David Feldman

1998 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 481-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Aloia ◽  
A. Vaswani ◽  
C. Delerme-Pagan ◽  
E. Flaster

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 1755-1760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen M. Evans ◽  
Kristine M. Ross ◽  
Kathrine L. Heinrichs ◽  
Edward McAuley ◽  
Karl S. Rosengren

Maturitas ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 356-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorraine Silver Wallace ◽  
Joyce E. Ballard ◽  
David B. Holiday ◽  
Henry E. Wells

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 2079-2085 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Alele ◽  
D. L. Kamen ◽  
K. L. Hermayer ◽  
J. Fernandes ◽  
J. Soule ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 2499-2506 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Walker ◽  
I. Saeed ◽  
D. J. McMahon ◽  
J. Udesky ◽  
G. Liu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Luke Del Vecchio ◽  
Nattai Borges ◽  
Campbell MacGregor ◽  
Jarrod D. Meerkin ◽  
Mike Climstein

Background: Previous research highlighted positive musculoskeletal adaptations resulting from mechanical forces and loadings distinctive to impacts and movements with sports participation. However, little is known about these adaptations in combat athletes. The aim of this study was to quantify bone mineral density, lean muscle mass and punching and kicking power in amateur male combat athletes. Methods: Thirteen male combat athletes (lightweight and middleweight) volunteered all physiological tests including dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for bone mineral density (BMD) segmental body composition (lean muscle mass, LMM), muscle strength and striking power, sedentary controls (n = 15) were used for selected DXA outcome variables. Results: There were significant differences (p < 0.05) between combat groups for lumbar spine (+5.0%), dominant arm (+4.4%) BMD, and dominant and non-dominant leg LMM (+21.8% and +22.6%). Controls had significantly (p < 0.05) high adiposity (+36.8% relative), visceral adipose tissue (VAT) mass (+69.7%), VAT area (+69.5%), lower total body BMD (−8.4%) and lumbar spine BMD (−13.8%) than controls. No differences in lower limb BMD were seen in combat groups. Arm lean mass differences (dominant versus non-dominant) were significantly different between combat groups (p < 0.05, 4.2% versus 7.3%). There were no differences in punch/kick power (absolute or relative) between combat groups. 5RM strength (bench and squat) correlated significantly with upper limb striking power (r = 0.57), dominant and non-dominant leg BMD (r = 0.67, r = 0.70, respectively) and total body BMD (r = 0.59). Conclusion: BMD and LMM appear to be particularly important to discriminate between dominant and non-dominant upper limbs and less so for lower limb dominance in recreational combat athletes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document