Anthropogenic Noise: Impacts on Animals ☆

Author(s):  
H. Slabbekoorn
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter Colpaert ◽  
Rafaela Landea Briones ◽  
Gustavo Chiang ◽  
Laela Sayigh

2021 ◽  
Vol 288 (1944) ◽  
pp. 20202851
Author(s):  
Alison Osbrink ◽  
Megan A. Meatte ◽  
Alan Tran ◽  
Katri K. Herranen ◽  
Lilliann Meek ◽  
...  

Noise pollution is commonly associated with human environments and mounting evidence indicates that noise has a variety of negative effects on wildlife. Noise has also been linked to cognitive impairment in humans and because many animals use cognitively intensive processes to overcome environmental challenges, noise pollution has the potential to interfere with cognitive function in animals living in urban areas or near roads. We experimentally examined how road traffic noise impacts avian cognitive performance by testing adult zebra finches ( Taeniopygia guttata ) on a battery of foraging tasks in the presence or absence of traffic noise playback. Here, we show that traffic noise reduces cognitive performance, including inhibitory control, motor learning, spatial memory and social learning, but not associative colour learning. This study demonstrates a novel mechanism through which anthropogenic noise can impact animals, namely through cognitive interference, and suggests that noise pollution may have previously unconsidered consequences for animals.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Ian T. Jones

Sound is utilized by marine animal taxa for many ecologically important functions, and these taxa are vulnerable to adverse effects of anthropogenic noise on hearing and behavior. However, little is known about marine invertebrates’ responses to anthropogenic noise, and the ambient environmental sounds (“soundscapes”) they detect and respond to. Most acoustic studies report sound pressure (detected by mammals and some fish), but few report particle motion, the back-and-forth vibratory component of sound detected by marine invertebrates. I investigated invertebrate use of and response to sounds in two facets: 1) behavioral responses of longfin squid, Doryteuthis pealeii to anthropogenic noise, and 2) particle motion of coral reef soundscapes in the U.S. Virgin Islands. In laboratory-based experiments I exposed D. pealeii to construction noise originally recorded from an offshore wind farm. I found significant increases in squids’ alarm responses and in failed prey capture attempts during noise. Conversely, noise exposure had no significant effects on reproductive behaviors of groups of D. pealeii, indicating high motivation of these squid to reproduce during this stressor. Collectively, these experiments revealed the importance of considering behavioral context in studies and regulatory decisions regarding invertebrates’ susceptibility to anthropogenic noise impacts. In studying coral reef soundscapes, I reported particle motion trends over several months for coral reefs varying in habitat quality, including coral cover and fish abundance. I found acoustic properties over which particle motion closely scaled with pressure, and others over which it did not. I compared soundscape data with particle motion hearing thresholds, and found that invertebrates may only detect high amplitude and low frequency transient sound cues on reefs, such as those produced by fishes. My research bring new insights on natural and anthropogenic sound cues detectable by marine invertebrates, and how and when invertebrates will be vulnerable to anthropogenic noise pollution.


2018 ◽  
Vol 180 ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander C. Keyel ◽  
Sarah E. Reed ◽  
Kathryn Nuessly ◽  
Elizeth Cinto-Mejia ◽  
Jesse R. Barber ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 741
Author(s):  
Granger Bennett ◽  
Jim McLoughlin

The ability of a marine animal to hear anthropogenic (man-made) sound underwater is affected by the animal’s auditory bandwidth and its sensitivity to sound of different frequencies within that bandwidth. Auditory bandwidths for marine animals vary from species to species and may or may not coincide with, or overlap, human auditory bandwidths. For example, turtles are not able to hear some sounds that are clearly audible to humans, while dolphins can hear sounds that are beyond the range of human hearing. Therefore, underwater noise impacts assessments for marine animals need to take into account both the spectral content of the anthropogenic noise and the auditory bandwidths of the various species under consideration. This paper demonstrates how the auditory bandwidth and sensitivity of marine animals to sounds of different frequencies can affect the outcomes of impact assessments. The analysis is supported by results from underwater noise modelling and noise measurements.


Author(s):  
J. Barber

As human populations have increased, our impact can now be felt even in the deepest remnants of wilderness (Vitousek et al. 1997). The resource demands of the ever-increasing human enterprise are creating substantial amplification of man-made pollution, including noise production. The dominant sources of anthropogenic noise are transportation networks, development (including energy, urban and industrial) and recreational activities. These activities are increasing faster than population growth. Between 1970 and 2007 the US population increased by approximately one third whereas (http://www.census.gov/compendia/statabO traffic on US roads nearly tripled, to almost 5 trillion vehicle kilometers per year, (http://www.thwa.dot.gov /ohim.tutw/tvpage.cfm.) Similar trends in shipping noise have also been observed in marine ecosystems, as discussed in reviews of noise impacts on marine animals (e.g., Nowacek et al. 2007).


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander C. Keyel ◽  
Sarah E. Reed ◽  
Kathryn Nuessly ◽  
Elizeth Cinto-Mejia ◽  
Jesse R. Barber ◽  
...  

SummaryNoise pollution is detrimental to a diversity of animal species and degrades natural areas, raising concern over the expanding footprint of anthropogenic noise on ecosystems. To guide management of noise sources, modeling tools have been developed to quantify noise levels across landscapes.We demonstrate how to model anthropogenic noise using sound propagation models, including noise from point, line, and polygon sources. In addition, we demonstrate three ways of evaluating spatially-explicit noise impacts, by identifying where noise 1) exceeds a sound level threshold, 2) is audible, or 3) has the potential to mask species communications. Finally, we examine approaches to mitigate these noise impacts on animal species.Noise sources in locations more favorable to sound propagation (e.g., locations with long, unobstructed lines-of-sight) will have a disproportionate impact on the surrounding area. We demonstrate how propagation models can identify sites with smaller acoustic footprints or sites that would benefit from additional noise-control measures.Modeling decisions, such as choice of sound propagation model, sound source information, and the quality of the input data, strongly influence the accuracy of model predictions. These decisions can be guided by comparing model predictions to empirical data when it is available.Synthesis and applications: Here, we demonstrate an approach for modeling and assessing anthropogenic noise sources across a landscape. Our versatile approach allows refining propagation outputs for species-specific questions as well as the quantitative evaluation of management alternatives. While the results are presented in the context of particular species, these approaches can be applied more generally to a wide range of taxa or used for multispecies assessments.


Author(s):  
Steven Barrett ◽  
Tom Reynolds ◽  
Maria Vera Morales ◽  
Zia Wadud ◽  
Rex Britter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document