Sustainability assessment for chemical product and process design during early design stages

Author(s):  
Paulo César Narváez Rincón ◽  
Juliana Serna ◽  
Álvaro Orjuela ◽  
Mauricio Camargo
2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 930-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren D. Seider ◽  
Soemantri Widagdo ◽  
J.D. Seader ◽  
Daniel R. Lewin

1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 254-268
Author(s):  
Robert G. Keane ◽  
Barry F. Tibbitts

The authors advocate the adoption of joint Navy-Industry Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) throughout the whole acquisition process for a new warship, including detail design and construction of the lead ship. This paper describes how the use of joint Navy-Industry IPTs is revolutionizing warship design during the early design stages, and identifies both the benefits and some of the critical obstacles for the use of such IPTs after contract award. The purpose of this paper is not to offer "textbook" solutions, but rather to stimulate discussion and to initiate dialog. The authors contend that the use of IPTs is essential to quality design and timely acquisition of effective, balanced, and affordable warships. The experience that U.S. shipbuilders gain from the application of Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD) principles to the design and construction of world-class warships can be directly transferred to the world-class development of commercial ships for the international market.


Author(s):  
Z. YAO ◽  
H.D. BRADLEY ◽  
P.G. MAROPOULOS

Existing product models do not adequately support the modelling of weld products during the early design stages. A newly developed aggregate product model for welding is introduced, which forms part of CAPABLE, a concurrent engineering toolkit for machining and welding. This product model supports the representation of the design at multiple levels of detail and allows the rapid modelling of alternative designs where solid model representation is inappropriate. The potential applications of the aggregate product model in weld product design, such as the integration of joint design and weldability assessment, are discussed using simple examples. The design of weld products must consider process-dependent properties including geometry, materials combinations, and weld joint characteristics to arrive at a near-optimal configuration. The object-oriented and feature-based model structure of CAPABLE enhances the design process by the automatic generation of compatible options and allows rapid design evaluation. The aggregate product model provides the input data necessary for tasks like process selection, optimization, process sequencing, fixture design and welding orientation selection. The main advantage of this product model over traditional CAD environments is that planning of the welding and fabrication operations can start during the conceptual and embodiment stages of the design process, thus ensuring the concurrency of design and planning tasks and resulting in product and process improvement and cost reduction.


Author(s):  
Daniela Schmid ◽  
Neville A. Stanton

Systems thinking methods have evolved into a popular toolkit in Human Factors to analyze complex sociotechnical systems at early design stages, such as future airliners’ single pilot operations (SPO). A quantitative re-analysis of studies from a systematic literature review (Schmid & Stanton, 2019b) was conducted to categorically assess their contributions to researching SPO and to fitting their systems thinking methods to contemporary Human Factors problems. Although only 15 of 79 publications applied systems thinking methods to operational, automation, and the pilot incapacitation issue(s) of SPO, these studies provided a comprehensive concept of operations that is able to deal with many issues of future single-piloted airliners. These theoretical models require further evaluation by looking at the empirical instances of system behavior. Finally, the hierarchical structures in system’s development and operations from systems thinking enable Human Factors professionals and researchers to approach SPO systematically.


Author(s):  
Jesse D. Peplinski ◽  
Janet K. Allen ◽  
Farrokh Mistree

Abstract How can the manufacturability of different product design alternatives be evaluated efficiently during the early stages of concept exploration? The benefits of such integrated product and manufacturing process design are widely recognized and include faster time to market, reduced development costs and production costs, and increased product quality. To reap these benefits fully, however, one must examine product/process trade-offs and cost/schedule/performance trade-offs in the early stages of design. Evaluating production cost and lead time requires detailed simulation or other analysis packages which 1) would be computationally expensive to run for every alternative, and 2) require detailed information that may or may not be available in these early design stages. Our approach is to generate response surfaces that serve as approximations to the analyses packages and use these approximations to identify robust regions of the design space for further exploration. In this paper we present a method for robust product and process exploration and illustrate this method using a simplified example of a machining center processing a single component. We close by discussing the implications of this work for manufacturing outsourcing, designing robust supplier chains, and ultimately designing the manufacturing enterprise itself.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document