Cell cycle control and DNA-damage signaling in mammals

2021 ◽  
pp. 237-255
Author(s):  
R. Gundogdu ◽  
A. Hergovich ◽  
V. Gómez
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling

scholarly journals The transcription factors TFE3 and TFEB amplify p53 dependent transcriptional programs in response to DNA damage

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eutteum Jeong ◽  
Owen A Brady ◽  
José A Martina ◽  
Mehdi Pirooznia ◽  
Ilker Tunc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
P53 Protein ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Double Knockout ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle

The transcription factors TFE3 and TFEB cooperate to regulate autophagy induction and lysosome biogenesis in response to starvation. Here we demonstrate that DNA damage activates TFE3 and TFEB in a p53 and mTORC1 dependent manner. RNA-Seq analysis of TFEB/TFE3 double-knockout cells exposed to etoposide reveals a profound dysregulation of the DNA damage response, including upstream regulators and downstream p53 targets. TFE3 and TFEB contribute to sustain p53-dependent response by stabilizing p53 protein levels. In TFEB/TFE3 DKOs, p53 half-life is significantly decreased due to elevated Mdm2 levels. Transcriptional profiles of genes involved in lysosome membrane permeabilization and cell death pathways are dysregulated in TFEB/TFE3-depleted cells. Consequently, prolonged DNA damage results in impaired LMP and apoptosis induction. Finally, expression of multiple genes implicated in cell cycle control is altered in TFEB/TFE3 DKOs, revealing a previously unrecognized role of TFEB and TFE3 in the regulation of cell cycle checkpoints in response to stress.

scholarly journals Interchangeable Roles for E2F Transcriptional Repression by the Retinoblastoma Protein and p27KIP1–Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Regulation in Cell Cycle Control and Tumor Suppression

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Thwaites ◽  
Matthew J. Cecchini ◽  
Daniel T. Passos ◽  
Ian Welch ◽  
Frederick A. Dick
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Retinoblastoma Protein ◽  
Level Control ◽  
Mutant Genotype ◽  
Single Mutant ◽  
Cdk Regulation

ABSTRACT The mammalian G1-S phase transition is controlled by the opposing forces of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) and the retinoblastoma protein (pRB). Here, we present evidence for systems-level control of cell cycle arrest by pRB-E2F and p27-CDK regulation. By introducing a point mutant allele of pRB that is defective for E2F repression (Rb1 G ) into a p27KIP1 null background (Cdkn1b −/−), both E2F transcriptional repression and CDK regulation are compromised. These double-mutant Rb1 G/G ; Cdkn1b −/− mice are viable and phenocopy Rb1 +/− mice in developing pituitary adenocarcinomas, even though neither single mutant strain is cancer prone. Combined loss of pRB-E2F transcriptional regulation and p27KIP1 leads to defective proliferative control in response to various types of DNA damage. In addition, Rb1 G/G ; Cdkn1b −/− fibroblasts immortalize faster in culture and more frequently than either single mutant genotype. Importantly, the synthetic DNA damage arrest defect caused by Rb1 G/G ; Cdkn1b −/− mutations is evident in the developing intermediate pituitary lobe where tumors ultimately arise. Our work identifies a unique relationship between pRB-E2F and p27-CDK control and offers in vivo evidence that pRB is capable of cell cycle control through E2F-independent effects.

scholarly journals Differentiation-Induced Radioresistance in Muscle Cells

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (14) ◽  
pp. 6350-6361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Latella ◽  
Jiri Lukas ◽  
Cristiano Simone ◽  
Pier Lorenzo Puri ◽  
Jiri Bartek
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Proliferating Cells ◽  
Histone H2ax ◽  
Selective Blockade ◽  
Differentiated Cells ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Ataxia Teleangiectasia ◽  
Associated Proteins

ABSTRACT DNA damage induces cell cycle arrest and DNA repair or apoptosis in proliferating cells. Terminally differentiated cells are permanently withdrawn from the cell cycle and partly resistant to apoptosis. To investigate the effects of genotoxic agents in postmitotic cells, we compared DNA damage-activated responses in mouse and human proliferating myoblasts and their differentiated counterparts, the myotubes. DNA double-strand breaks caused by ionizing radiation (IR) induced rapid activating autophosphorylation of ataxia-teleangiectasia-mutated (ATM), phosphorylation of histone H2AX, recruitment of repair-associated proteins MRE11 and Nbs1, and activation of Chk2 in both myoblasts and myotubes. However, IR-activated, ATM-mediated phosphorylation of p53 at serine 15 (human) or 18 (mouse) [Ser15(h)/18(m)], and apoptosis occurred in myoblasts but was impaired in myotubes. This phosphorylation could be enforced in myotubes by the anthracycline derivative doxorubicin, leading to selective activation of proapoptotic genes. Unexpectedly, the abundance of autophosphorylated ATM was indistinguishable after exposure of myotubes to IR (10 Gy) or doxorubicin (1 μM/24 h) despite efficient phosphorylation of p53 Ser15(h)/18(m), and apoptosis occurred only in response to doxorubicin. These results suggest that radioresistance in myotubes might reflect a differentiation-associated, pathway-selective blockade of DNA damage signaling downstream of ATM. This mechanism appears to preserve IR-induced activation of the ATM-H2AX-MRE11/Rad50/Nbs1 lesion processing and repair pathway yet restrain ATM-p53-mediated apoptosis, thereby contributing to life-long maintenance of differentiated muscle tissues.

scholarly journals DNA damage signaling, impairment of cell cycle progression, and apoptosis triggered by 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine incorporated into DNA

2013 ◽  
Vol 83 (11) ◽  
pp. 979-988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Zhao ◽  
H. Dorota Halicka ◽  
Jiangwei Li ◽  
Ewa Biela ◽  
Krzysztof Berniak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling

scholarly journals Regulatory networks integrating cell cycle control with DNA damage checkpoints and double-strand break repair

2011 ◽  
Vol 366 (1584) ◽  
pp. 3562-3571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Langerak ◽  
Paul Russell
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

Double-strand breaks (DSBs), arising from exposure to exogenous clastogens or as a by-product of endogenous cellular metabolism, pose grave threats to genome integrity. DSBs can sever whole chromosomes, leading to chromosomal instability, a hallmark of cancer. Healing broken DNA takes time, and it is therefore essential to temporarily halt cell division while DSB repair is underway. The seminal discovery of cyclin-dependent kinases as master regulators of the cell cycle unleashed a series of studies aimed at defining how the DNA damage response network delays cell division. These efforts culminated with the identification of Cdc25, the protein phosphatase that activates Cdc2/Cdk1, as a critical target of the checkpoint kinase Chk1. However, regulation works both ways, as recent studies have revealed that Cdc2 activity and cell cycle position determine whether DSBs are repaired by non-homologous end-joining or homologous recombination (HR). Central to this regulation are the proteins that initiate the processing of DNA ends for HR repair, Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1 protein complex and Ctp1/Sae2/CtIP, and the checkpoint kinases Tel1/ATM and Rad3/ATR. Here, we review recent findings and provide insight on how proteins that regulate cell cycle progression affect DSB repair, and, conversely how proteins that repair DSBs affect cell cycle progression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document