scholarly journals The transcription factors TFE3 and TFEB amplify p53 dependent transcriptional programs in response to DNA damage

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eutteum Jeong ◽  
Owen A Brady ◽  
José A Martina ◽  
Mehdi Pirooznia ◽  
Ilker Tunc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
P53 Protein ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Double Knockout ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle

The transcription factors TFE3 and TFEB cooperate to regulate autophagy induction and lysosome biogenesis in response to starvation. Here we demonstrate that DNA damage activates TFE3 and TFEB in a p53 and mTORC1 dependent manner. RNA-Seq analysis of TFEB/TFE3 double-knockout cells exposed to etoposide reveals a profound dysregulation of the DNA damage response, including upstream regulators and downstream p53 targets. TFE3 and TFEB contribute to sustain p53-dependent response by stabilizing p53 protein levels. In TFEB/TFE3 DKOs, p53 half-life is significantly decreased due to elevated Mdm2 levels. Transcriptional profiles of genes involved in lysosome membrane permeabilization and cell death pathways are dysregulated in TFEB/TFE3-depleted cells. Consequently, prolonged DNA damage results in impaired LMP and apoptosis induction. Finally, expression of multiple genes implicated in cell cycle control is altered in TFEB/TFE3 DKOs, revealing a previously unrecognized role of TFEB and TFE3 in the regulation of cell cycle checkpoints in response to stress.

scholarly journals The DNA Damage-Induced Cell Cycle Checkpoints

2000 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-243
Author(s):  
Piotr Widlak
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
P53 Protein ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Signal Transduction Pathways ◽  
Cycle Progression

The proliferation of eukaryotic cells is driven by a process called the cell cycle. Proper regulation of this process, leading to orderly execution of sequential steps within the cycle, ensures normal development and homeostasis of the organism. On the other hand, perturbations of the cell cycle are frequently attributed to cancer cells. Mechanisms that ensure the order and fidelity of events in the cell cycle are called checkpoints. The checkpoints induced by damaged DNA delay the cell cycle progression, providing more time for repair of lesion before DNA replication and segregation. The DNA damage-induced checkpoints can be recognized as signal transduction pathways that communicate information between DNA lesion and components of the cell cycle. Proteins involved in the cell cycle, as well as components of the signal transduction pathways communicating with the cell cycle, are frequently products of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Malfunction of these genes plays a critical role in the development of human cancers. The key component in the checkpoint machinery is tumor suppressor gene p53, involved in either regulation of the cell cycle progression (e.g. Gl arrest of cells treated with DNA damaging factor) or activation of programmed cell death (apoptosis). It is postulated that p53 protein is activated by DNA damage detectors. One of the candidates for this role is DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) which recognizes DNA strand breaks and phosphorylates p53 protein.

scholarly journals Cell cycle checkpoints cooperate to suppress DNA and RNA associated molecular pattern recognition and anti-tumor immune responses

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Chen ◽  
Shane M Harding ◽  
Ramakrishnan Natesan ◽  
Lei Tian ◽  
Joseph L Benci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Immune Responses ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Dna And Rna ◽  
Molecular Pattern ◽  
Immune Mediated

SummaryThe DNA dependent pattern recognition receptor, cGAS mediates communication between genotoxic stress and the immune system. Mitotic chromosome missegregation is an established stimulator of cGAS activity, however, it is unclear if progression through mitosis is required for cancer cell intrinsic activation of immune mediated anti-tumor responses. Moreover, it is unknown if disruption of cell cycle checkpoints can restore responses in cancer cells that are recalcitrant to DNA damage induced inflammation. Here we demonstrate that prolonged cell cycle arrest at the G2-mitosis boundary from either CDK1 inhibition or excessive DNA damage prevents inflammatory stimulated gene expression and immune mediated destruction of distal tumors. Remarkably, DNA damage induced inflammatory signaling is restored in a cGAS-and RIG-I-dependent manner upon concomitant disruption of p53 and the G2 checkpoint. These findings link aberrant cell progression and p53 loss to an expanded spectrum of damage associated molecular pattern recognition and have implications for the design of rational approaches to augment antitumor immune responses.

scholarly journals Negative regulator of E2F transcription factors links cell cycle checkpoint and DNA damage repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (16) ◽  
pp. E3837-E3845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Wang ◽  
Hanchen Chen ◽  
Chongyang Wang ◽  
Zhenjie Hu ◽  
Shunping Yan
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
E2f Transcription Factors

DNA damage poses a serious threat to genome integrity and greatly affects growth and development. To maintain genome stability, all organisms have evolved elaborate DNA damage response mechanisms including activation of cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair. Here, we show that the DNA repair protein SNI1, a subunit of the evolutionally conserved SMC5/6 complex, directly links these two processes in Arabidopsis. SNI1 binds to the activation domains of E2F transcription factors, the key regulators of cell cycle progression, and represses their transcriptional activities. In turn, E2Fs activate the expression of SNI1, suggesting that E2Fs and SNI1 form a negative feedback loop. Genetically, overexpression of SNI1 suppresses the phenotypes of E2F-overexpressing plants, and loss of E2F function fully suppresses the sni1 mutant, indicating that SNI1 is necessary and sufficient to inhibit E2Fs. Altogether, our study revealed that SNI1 is a negative regulator of E2Fs and plays dual roles in DNA damage responses by linking cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair.

scholarly journals Involvement of Retinoblastoma Protein and HBP1 in Histone H10 Gene Expression

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (18) ◽  
pp. 6627-6637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudie Lemercier ◽  
Kym Duncliffe ◽  
Isabelle Boibessot ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
André Verdel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
High Mobility ◽  
Retinoblastoma Protein ◽  
Histone H1 ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Encoding Gene

ABSTRACT The histone H10-encoding gene is expressed in vertebrates in differentiating cells during the arrest of proliferation. In the H10 promoter, a specific regulatory element, which we named the H4 box, exhibits features which implicate a role in mediating H10 gene expression in response to both differentiation and cell cycle control signals. For instance, within the linker histone gene family, the H4 box is found only in the promoters of differentiation-associated subtypes, suggesting that it is specifically involved in differentiation-dependent expression of these genes. In addition, an element nearly identical to the H4 box is conserved in the promoters of histone H4-encoding genes and is known to be involved in their cell cycle-dependent expression. The transcription factors interacting with the H10 H4 box were therefore expected to link differentiation-dependent expression of H10 to the cell cycle control machinery. The aim of this work was to identify such transcription factors and to obtain information concerning the regulatory pathway involved. Interestingly, our cloning strategy led to the isolation of a retinoblastoma protein (RB) partner known as HBP1. HBP1, a high-mobility group box transcription factor, interacted specifically with the H10H4 box and moreover was expressed in a differentiation-dependent manner. We also showed that the HBP1-encoding gene is able to produce different forms of HBP1. Finally, we demonstrated that both HBP1 and RB were involved in the activation of H10 gene expression. We therefore propose that HBP1 mediates a link between the cell cycle control machinery and cell differentiation signals. Through modulating the expression of specific chromatin-associated proteins such as histone H10, HBP1 plays a vital role in chromatin remodeling events during the arrest of cell proliferation in differentiating cells.

Hypoxia induces accumulation of p53 protein, but activation of a G1-phase checkpoint by low-oxygen conditions is independent of p53 status

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 6264-6277
Author(s):  
T G Graeber ◽  
J F Peterson ◽  
M Tsai ◽  
K Monica ◽  
A J Fornace ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
P53 Protein ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
In Cells

It has been convincingly demonstrated that genotoxic stresses cause the accumulation of the tumor suppressor gene p53. One important consequence of increased p53 protein levels in response to DNA damage is the activation of a G1-phase cell cycle checkpoint. It has also been shown that G1-phase cell cycle checkpoints are activated in response to other stresses, such as lack of oxygen. Here we show that hypoxia and heat, agents that induce cellular stress primarily by inhibiting oxygen-dependent metabolism and denaturing proteins, respectively, also cause an increase in p53 protein levels. The p53 protein induced by heat is localized in the cytoplasm and forms a complex with the heat shock protein hsc70. The increase in nuclear p53 protein levels and DNA-binding activity and the induction of reporter gene constructs containing p53 binding sites following hypoxia occur in cells that are wild type for p53 but not in cells that possess mutant p53. However, unlike ionizing radiation, the accumulation of cells in G1 phase by hypoxia is not strictly dependent on wild-type p53 function. In addition, cells expressing the human papillomavirus E6 gene, which show increased degradation of p53 by ubiquitination and fail to accumulate p53 in response to DNA-damaging agents, do increase their p53 levels following heat and hypoxia. These results suggest that hypoxia is an example of a "nongenotoxic" stress which induces p53 activity by a different pathway than DNA-damaging agents.

scholarly journals Hypoxia induces accumulation of p53 protein, but activation of a G1-phase checkpoint by low-oxygen conditions is independent of p53 status.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 6264-6277 ◽  
Author(s):  
T G Graeber ◽  
J F Peterson ◽  
M Tsai ◽  
K Monica ◽  
A J Fornace ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
P53 Protein ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
In Cells

It has been convincingly demonstrated that genotoxic stresses cause the accumulation of the tumor suppressor gene p53. One important consequence of increased p53 protein levels in response to DNA damage is the activation of a G1-phase cell cycle checkpoint. It has also been shown that G1-phase cell cycle checkpoints are activated in response to other stresses, such as lack of oxygen. Here we show that hypoxia and heat, agents that induce cellular stress primarily by inhibiting oxygen-dependent metabolism and denaturing proteins, respectively, also cause an increase in p53 protein levels. The p53 protein induced by heat is localized in the cytoplasm and forms a complex with the heat shock protein hsc70. The increase in nuclear p53 protein levels and DNA-binding activity and the induction of reporter gene constructs containing p53 binding sites following hypoxia occur in cells that are wild type for p53 but not in cells that possess mutant p53. However, unlike ionizing radiation, the accumulation of cells in G1 phase by hypoxia is not strictly dependent on wild-type p53 function. In addition, cells expressing the human papillomavirus E6 gene, which show increased degradation of p53 by ubiquitination and fail to accumulate p53 in response to DNA-damaging agents, do increase their p53 levels following heat and hypoxia. These results suggest that hypoxia is an example of a "nongenotoxic" stress which induces p53 activity by a different pathway than DNA-damaging agents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document