Influence of the diagnostic protocol and age on the prostate cancer incidence rate in Castilla y León according to the national registry 2010

Author(s):  
M.I. Gutiérrez-Pérez ◽  
M. González-Sagrado ◽  
R. Conde-Vicente ◽  
J.H. Amón-Sesmero
2015 ◽  
Vol 193 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Lyons ◽  
Tzy-Mey Kuo ◽  
Anne-Marie Meyer ◽  
E. Sophie Spencer ◽  
Peter Greene ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 183-183
Author(s):  
J. Li ◽  
R. German ◽  
J. King ◽  
D. Joseph ◽  
T. Thompson ◽  
...  

183 Background: Prostate cancer has long been considered as a disease of older men. However, age at diagnosis with prostate cancer has continued to decline. Since the introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in 1986, the prostate cancer incidence rate has steadily and dramatically increased in men under age 50. This study aims to better understand demographic variations in prostate cancer screening and incidence, and clinical characteristics of prostate cancers in men under age 50. Methods: We examined prostate cancer testing data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008) and prostate cancer incidence data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries and the NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results programs (2001-2006). We estimated the weighted percentage of self-reported cancer testing using SUDAAN and age-adjusted cancer incidence rates and trends using SEER-STAT. Statistical significance for trends was determined by the annual percentage change (APC) differing form zero. Results: A total of 29,176 prostate cancer cases were identified from 2001-2006 among men under age 50. Of these, 551 (1.9%) were among men under age 40. Incidence rates remained stable from 2001-2006; however the incidence of well-differentiated tumors decreased significantly (APC=−24.7) during this time period. About 44% of men aged 40-49 years old reported having a prostate cancer test in the past two years. Prostate cancer testing and incidence rates were highest among men who were black, non-Hispanic, or lived in the northeast. Black men had more than a 2-fold increase in cancer incidence than white men. Conclusions: The magnitude of prostate cancer testing and incidence in men under age 50 reveals significant health/public health problems in this younger population. This study demonstrates substantial regional differences in prostate cancer testing and incidence in men under age 50. It also confirms that prostate cancer testing and incidence varies by race and ethnicity. We observed a large disparity in prostate cancer incidence between blacks and whites. The incidence rate remained stable over time; the dramatic decrease occurred in well-differentiated cancers. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 129-129
Author(s):  
John F. Donohue ◽  
Fernando J. Bianco ◽  
Kentaro Kuroiwa ◽  
Andrew J. Vickers ◽  
Thomas M. Wheeler ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Urszula Wojciechowska ◽  
◽  
Lauren M. Hurwitz ◽  
Grzegorz Helicki ◽  
Jennifer Cullen ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3873
Author(s):  
Liang Hu ◽  
Andrew Harper ◽  
Emily Heer ◽  
Jessica McNeil ◽  
Chao Cao ◽  
...  

We investigated the association of social jetlag (misalignment between the internal clock and socially required timing of activities) and prostate cancer incidence in a prospective cohort in Alberta, Canada. Data were collected from 7455 cancer-free men aged 35–69 years enrolled in Alberta’s Tomorrow Project (ATP) from 2001–2007. In the 2008 survey, participants reported usual bed- and wake-times on weekdays and weekend days. Social jetlag was defined as the absolute difference in waking time between weekday and weekend days, and was categorized into three groups: 0–<1 h (from 0 to anything smaller than 1), 1–<2 h (from 1 to anything smaller than 2), and 2+ h. ATP facilitated data linkage with the Alberta Cancer Registry in June 2018 to determine incident prostate cancer cases (n = 250). Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regressions, adjusting for a range of covariates. Median follow-up was 9.57 years, yielding 68,499 person-years. Baseline presence of social jetlag of 1–<2 h (HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.01), and 2+ hours (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.15 to 2.46) were associated with increased prostate cancer risk vs. those reporting no social jetlag (p for trend = 0.004). These associations remained after adjusting for sleep duration (p for trend = 0.006). With respect to chronotype, the association between social jetlag and prostate cancer risk remained significant in men with early chronotypes (p for trend = 0.003) but attenuated to null in men with intermediate (p for trend = 0.150) or late chronotype (p for trend = 0.381). Our findings suggest that greater than one hour of habitual social jetlag is associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. Longitudinal studies with repeated measures of social jetlag and large samples with sufficient advanced prostate cancer cases are needed to confirm these findings.


Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. e13897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu-Chao Liu ◽  
Kuo-Chun Hua ◽  
Jr-Rung Lin ◽  
See-Tong Pang ◽  
Huang-Ping Yu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document