scholarly journals Site-Specific Education Using Digital Media to Improve Patient Understanding of the Radiotherapy Trajectory: An Interventional Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 100742
Author(s):  
Hussain Almerdhemah ◽  
Zaheeda Mulla ◽  
Hane Mohammad Muamenah ◽  
Amina Weber ◽  
Tarik Boubakra ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Aroney ◽  
Ryan Markham ◽  
Anthony Putrino ◽  
James Crowhurst ◽  
Douglas Wall ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Three-dimensional (3D) printing of cardiac fistulae allows for immediate understanding of their complex courses and anatomical relations. Models can be used to improve patient understanding, enhance the consenting process, facilitate communication between multidisciplinary staff at heart team meetings, and help plan surgical or percutaneous interventions. Case summary We report four cases where 3D printed models were used as an adjunct with traditional measures in treating patients with complex cardiac fistulae. Discussion In our cases, overall patient understanding was improved, staff at heart team meetings were more aware of anatomical anomalies and perioperatively planning saw adjustments made that may have ultimately benefited patient outcome. Our cases highlight the additional benefit that 3D printed models can play when treating patients with complex cardiac fistulae.


Trials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valérie M. Smit-Fun ◽  
Dianne de Korte-de Boer ◽  
Linda M. Posthuma ◽  
Annick Stolze ◽  
Carmen D. Dirksen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 205141581987651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Y. Chen ◽  
Jacob Skewes ◽  
Maria A. Woodruff ◽  
Nicholas J. Rukin

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 240-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria R. Grice ◽  
Amy Tiemeier ◽  
Peter Hurd ◽  
Tricia M. Berry ◽  
Mychal Voorhees ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Maja Rudloff

As museums are shifting their traditional focus away from collections and toward their audiences, they are experimenting with new strategies for communication and participation. Consequently, in recent years, a large number of outreach and visitor engagement projects, implemented by museums, have seen the light of day. Although these projects vary significantly in design and setting, they are typically informed by ideas of inclusion, dialogue, and sharing of knowledge – principles that have been inspired by social media and significantly improved by developments in digital technologies. Despite the increasing numbers of museum-facilitated outreach projects, we still know relatively little about the qualitative outcomes for either users or museums. This article investigates the potential impact of including an outreach component in a new museum project that combines an urban setting and the use of digital media.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
J Odone ◽  
R Schiff

Abstract Background There is no national guidance for the transfer of Do Not Attempt Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions between care settings. This issue has been highlighted within our Integrated Care Trust. We reviewed our local process, to improve the transfer of DNACPR decisions between care settings. Method A third PDSA cycle was completed to evaluate intervention. Intervention Frequently asked questions were added to the reverse side of the DNACPR form to improve patient understanding. All patients discharged home were given this updated form during a pilot study. The impact of the intervention was analysed with a follow-up phone call (n = 30) and discussed at a staff focus group. Results No improvement in patient understanding was shown post-intervention, however the intervention was overwhelmingly supported by staff. 60% of patients reported receiving a DNACPR form on discharge and 12% recalled being informed that they would be discharged home with a form. Conclusion Further work is required on the DNACPR pathway across primary and secondary care. The next cycle will involve ensuring that the community form is highlighted in hospital discussions regarding DNACPR decisions.


Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Ekstrom ◽  
Angeliqua Pochert ◽  
Jaleen Smith ◽  
Lee S Chung ◽  
Peter M Hannon ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18217-e18217
Author(s):  
Rebecca D. Pentz ◽  
Rachel Hannah Pocock ◽  
Ana M Pinheiro ◽  
Jeffrey M. Switchenko ◽  
Margie D Dixon

e18217 Background: Molecular testing is being used with increasing prevalence to diagnose and treat cancer. Novel technical terminology is required to describe this testing to patients; however, it is unknown what language is being used and whether this language is understood, This study aimed to determine how oncologists describe this testing to patients and whether patients understand the technical terms and conceptual topics used by physicians. Methods: Patients and oncologists were consented for this study at one academic and two community hospitals. Conversations including a discussion of molecular testing were recorded; patients were then interviewed to assess their understanding of the terminology and topics described by their physicians. Recordings were transcribed and qualitatively analyzed; descriptive statistics were calculated from the coded data to identify the most frequently used technical terms and conceptual topics, assess overall patient understanding, and calculate an understanding score for each patient. Results: Sixty conversations about molecular testing were observed and recorded between 60 patients and 19 physicians. Thirty-four different technical terms were used by oncologists to describe 5 technical themes (mutation, molecular testing, targeted therapy, driver mutation, and biomarker). Patients understood 45% of undefined technical terms and 43% of defined technical terms. Physicians explained why the molecular testing was ordered in 67% of conversations, with 71% of patients demonstrating understanding, and how the testing would determine the patient’s treatment in 93% of conversations, with 80% of patients demonstrating understanding. Conclusions: Oncologists use variable language to describe molecular testing to patients. Patients do not understand most of the terms being used and defining technical terms does not improve patient understanding. Despite this, oncologists are effectively communicating the purpose of molecular testing and the effect of such testing on patient treatment. Future studies are warranted to determine which language and methods are most effective for describing molecular testing to patients. Guidelines and training for oncologists may be beneficial.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 194-200
Author(s):  
Alannah L. Cooper ◽  
Janie A. Brown ◽  
Julie Salathiel ◽  
Sally Gollner

Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Claire Sibold ◽  
Mary Catherine Thomson ◽  
Rachel Hianik ◽  
Eli R. Abernethy ◽  
Gavin P. Campbell ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document