<p>Modern models of environmental and industrial systems have reached a relatively high level of complexity. The latter aspect could hamper an unambiguous understanding of the functioning of a model, i.e., how it drives relationships and dependencies among inputs and outputs of interest. Sensitivity Analysis tools can be employed to examine this issue.</p><p>Global sensitivity analysis (GSA) approaches rest on the evaluation of sensitivity across the entire support within which system model parameters are supposed to vary. In this broad context, it is important to note that the definition of a sensitivity metric must be linked to the nature of the question(s) the GSA is meant to address. These include, for example: (i) which are the most important model parameters with respect to given model output(s)?; (ii) could we set some parameter(s) (thus assisting model calibration) at prescribed value(s) without significantly affecting model results?; (iii) at which space/time locations can one expect the highest sensitivity of model output(s) to model parameters and/or knowledge of which parameter(s) could be most beneficial for model calibration?</p><p>The variance-based Sobol&#8217; Indices (e.g., Sobol, 2001) represent one of the most widespread GSA metrics, quantifying the average reduction in the variance of a model output stemming from knowledge of the input. Amongst other techniques, Dell&#8217;Oca et al. [2017] proposed a moment-based GSA approach which enables one to quantify the influence of uncertain model parameters on the (statistical) moments of a target model output.</p><p>Here, we embed in these sensitivity indices the effect of uncertainties both in the system model conceptualization and in the ensuing model(s) parameters. The study is grounded on the observation that physical processes and natural systems within which they take place are complex, rendering target state variables amenable to multiple interpretations and mathematical descriptions. As such, predictions and uncertainty analyses based on a single model formulation can result in statistical bias and possible misrepresentation of the total uncertainty, thus justifying the assessment of multiple model system conceptualizations. We then introduce copula-based sensitivity metrics which allow characterizing the global (with respect to the input) value of the sensitivity and the degree of variability (across the whole range of the input values) of the sensitivity for each value that the prescribed model output can possibly undertake, as driven by a governing model. In this sense, such an approach to sensitivity is global with respect to model input(s) and local with respect to model output, thus enabling one to discriminate the relevance of an input across the entire range of values of the modeling goal of interest. The methodology is demonstrated in the context of flow and reactive transport scenarios.</p><p>&#160;</p><p><strong>References</strong></p><p>Sobol, I. M., 2001. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Math. Comput. Sim., 55, 271-280.</p><p>Dell&#8217;Oca, A., Riva, M., Guadagnini, A., 2017. Moment-based metrics for global sensitivity analysis of hydrological systems. Hydr. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 6219-6234.</p>
Sensitivity analysis of conceptual model calibration to initialisation bias. Application to karst spring discharge models
