Is Frequency of Accessing Central Venous Catheters Associated with Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection in Children with Cancer?

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. S14
Author(s):  
Mary Anne Giannini ◽  
Sharon Williams ◽  
Sherry Johnson ◽  
Aditya Gaur ◽  
Hana Hakim
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-183
Author(s):  
Leena Kuriakose

BackgroundThe majority of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) require central venous catheters (CVC) for medication delivery, monitoring and blood draws. Repeated access of CVCs for collection of blood can cause central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). If the number of times CVCs accessed for routine blood draws can be limited, the incidence of CLABSI in ICUs could be decreased.ObjectiveThe focus of this quality improvement (QI) project was to decrease the CLABSI rate through limiting the use of and standardizing the process for routine blood draws through CVCs.MethodsAll nursing staff were educated on the process change. Pre and post education CLABSI rates were compared to measure the outcome.ResultsThe number of times CVCs accessed for routine blood work and CLABSI rate decreased after the intervention.ConclusionThe data collected supported that decreasing the use of CVCs for routine blood draws can decrease the number of times CVCs are accessed per shift and decrease the CLABSI rate.Implications for NursingNurses are at the front line in preventing, reducing, and sustaining zero CLABSI rate through implementing evidence based practices.


Author(s):  
Prachi Dubey ◽  
Sanjay Varma ◽  
Anupam Kujur ◽  
Bhuwan Sharma

Background: Central venous catheterization is a relatively common procedure in many branches of medicine particularly in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Central venous catheters give an easy access for giving drugs as well as for sampling of blood, but they can also be a cause of blood stream infection and sepsis.Methods: Patients who requiring central venous catheter were selected, relevant blood investigations were done before insertion of catheter and after 48 hours after insertion. With the suspicion of new infection, physical examination and laboratory work-ups were carried out to identify the other source of infection.Results: Total 96 patients were selected with mean age of 40.0±13.89 years. The incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection/catheter-related bloodstream infection (CLABSI/CRBSI) in our hospital based study in intensive care units comes out 34.37%. The CLABSI/CRBSI patients (n=33) on general physical examination 5 patients have bradycardia, hypertension hypothermia oliguria altered mental status hypotension tachypnea tachycardia and 26 patients have developed fever during the course of illness. The predominant organism isolated in CLABSI/CRBSI patients is Staphylococcus aureus. Central venous catheters are useful in getting access and also source of blood stream investigation. Site of catheter, duration of catheter and co morbidities acts as risk factor for infection.Conclusions: By knowing the risk factors to cause catheter related infections, risk of getting infection can be lowered by using aseptic technique during insertion and proper catheter care and this can further reduces morbidity and mortality related to central venous catheters.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s258-s258
Author(s):  
Madhuri Tirumandas ◽  
Theresa Madaline ◽  
Gregory David Weston ◽  
Ruchika Jain ◽  
Jamie Figueredo

Background: Although central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in US hospitals have improved in the last decade, ~30,100 CLABSIs occur annually.1,2 Central venous catheters (CVC) carry a high risk of infections and should be limited to appropriate clinical indications.6,7 Montefiore Medical Center, a large, urban, academic medical center in the Bronx, serves a high-risk population with multiple comobidities.8–11 Despite this, the critical care medicine (CCM) team is often consulted to place a CVC when a peripheral intravenous line (PIV) cannot be obtained by nurses or primary providers. We evaluated the volume of CCM consultation requests for avoidable CVCs and related CLABSIs. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed for patients with CCM consultation requests for CVC placement between July and October 2019. The indication for CVC, type of catheter inserted or recommended, and NHSN data were used to identify CLABSIs. CVCs were considered avoidable if a PIV was used for the stated indication and duration of therapy, with no anatomical contraindications to PIV in nonemergencies, according to the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC).6Results: Of 229 total CCM consults, 4 (18%) requests were for CVC placement; 21 consultations (9%) were requested for avoidable CVCs. Of 40 CVC requests, 18 (45%) resulted in CVC placement by the CCM team, 4 (10%) were deferred for nonurgent PICC by interventional radiology, and 18 (45%) were deferred in favor of PIV or no IV. Indications for CVC insertion included emergent chemotherapy (n = 8, 44%) and dialysis (n = 3, 16%), vasopressors (n = 3, 16%), antibiotics (n = 2, 11%) and blood transfusion (n = 2, 11%). Of 18 CVCs, 9 (50%) were potentially avoidable: 2 short-term antibiotics and rest for nonemergent indications; 2 blood transfusions, 1 dialysis, 2 chemotherapy and 2 vasopressors. Between July and October 2019, 6 CLABSIs occurred in CVCs placed by the CCM team; in 3 of 6 CLABSI events (50%), the CVC was avoidable. Conclusions: More than half of consultation requests to the CCM team for CVCs are avoidable, and they disproportionately contribute to CLABSI events. Alternatives for intravenous access could potentially avoid 9% of CCM consultations and 50% of CLABSIs in CCM-inserted CVCs on medical-surgical wards.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document