scholarly journals Phosphorus feeding practices, barriers to and motivators for minimising phosphorus feeding to dairy cows in diverse dairy farming systems

animal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 100248
Author(s):  
B.P. Harrison ◽  
M. Dorigo ◽  
C.K. Reynolds ◽  
L.A. Sinclair ◽  
P.P. Ray
2021 ◽  
Vol 190 ◽  
pp. 103119
Author(s):  
Andrew P. Smith ◽  
Karen M. Christie ◽  
Matthew T. Harrison ◽  
Richard J. Eckard

2009 ◽  
Vol 92 (11) ◽  
pp. 5476-5486 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Dippel ◽  
M. Dolezal ◽  
C. Brenninkmeyer ◽  
J. Brinkmann ◽  
S. March ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 17-20
Author(s):  
MM Scholtz ◽  
J Du Toit ◽  
FWC Neser

Primary beef cattle farming in South Africa is largely extensive, whereas dairy farming is based on both total mixed ration and pasture production systems. Under natural rangeland conditions, decomposition of manure is aerobic, which produces carbon dioxide (CO2), part of which is absorbed by the regrowth of vegetation rather than released into the atmosphere, and water (H2O) as end products. Thus the cow releases methane (CH4) and the manure CO2. This is in contrast to intensive cow-calf systems in large parts of Europe and North America, where large quantities of manure are stockpiled and undergo anaerobic decomposition and produce CH4. Thus both the cow and the manure release CH4, which result in a higher carbon footprint than the extensive cow-calf systems. In dairy farming, increasing cow efficiency through intensive feeding (same kg milk output by fewer animals) can reduce farm CH4 production by up to 15%. In addition, when differences in productivity are accounted for, pasture systems require more resources (land, feed, water, etc.) per unit of milk produced and the carbon footprint is greater than that of intensive systems. This raises the question as to why the carbon footprint of intensive dairy cow production systems is less, but the carbon footprint of intensive beef cow-calf production systems is higher. The explanation lies in the differences in production levels. In the case of beef cows the weight of the intensive cows will be ± 30% higher than that of the extensive cows, and the weaning weight of their calves will also differ by ± 30%. In the case of dairy cows the weight of the intensive cows will be ± 20% higher, but their milk production will be ± 60% higher. The higher increase in production (milk) of intensive dairy cows, compared to the increase in production (calf weight) of intensive beef cows, explains the antagonism in the carbon footprint between different beef and dairy production systems. Unfortunately, carbon sequestration estimates have been neglected and thus the quantitative effects of these differences are not known.Keywords: Cow-calf production, methane, pasture production, production levels, total mixed ration


2016 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 91-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Battini ◽  
A. Agostini ◽  
V. Tabaglio ◽  
S. Amaducci

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.J. van Calker ◽  
P.B.M. Berentsen ◽  
G.W.J. Giesen ◽  
R.B.M. Huirne

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Brock ◽  
Bradford Barham

AbstractAlthough the emergence of large confinement operations out of a system previously dominated by mid-sized confinement has been one major structural trend in Wisconsin dairy farming since the 1990s, a second structural trend has been the significant emergence of moderate-sized dairy farms using alternative management strategies: management-intensive rotational grazing (MIRG) (25% of Wisconsin's dairy farms), organic production (3%) and Amish farm production practices (5–7%). This paper presents the first systematic and representative comparative study on the structure, behavior and performance of multiple pasture-based dairy farm strategies. Wisconsin is an ideal site for this study given the prevalence of pasture-based farms, yet many of the findings here should be relevant for other traditional dairy states where similar types of alternative farm management systems are also emerging. Divergence with respect to farm strategy has implications for structure, technology and management adoption patterns as well as farmer satisfaction levels. Our findings suggest that alternative dairy farming systems are likely to become more prevalent on the agricultural landscape of Wisconsin.


2017 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 61-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Poizat ◽  
F. Bonnet-Beaugrand ◽  
A. Rault ◽  
C. Fourichon ◽  
N. Bareille

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document