Prevalence of serious mental illness among parents in the United States: results from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health, 2008–2014

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leyla F. Stambaugh ◽  
Valerie Forman-Hoffman ◽  
Jason Williams ◽  
Michael R. Pemberton ◽  
Heather Ringeisen ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 656-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Carrà ◽  
Francesco Bartoli ◽  
Ilaria Riboldi ◽  
Giulia Trotta ◽  
Cristina Crocamo

Background: Little is known about the influence of contextual characteristics on comorbid substance use and serious mental illness (SMI). Aims: To explore the role of poverty on comorbid SMI and cannabis use. Methods: We used data from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, considering those in poverty, with income under 100% of the US poverty threshold. Results: People in poverty were more likely to suffer from concurrent SMI and cannabis use (3.07%, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.84%; 5.07%), even controlling for gender, age, tobacco and alcohol use (odds ratio (OR) = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.27; 6.03, p = .010). Conclusion: The magnitude of the association between SMI and cannabis use is influenced by poverty status. More research on potential mediators like income inequality and impoverished social capital is needed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Stuart Reece ◽  
Gary Kenneth Hulse

Abstract Background: Whilst many studies have linked increased drug and cannabis exposure to adverse mental health (MH) outcomes their effects on whole populations and geotemporospatial relationships are not well understood. Methods Ecological cohort study of National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) geographically-linked substate-shapefiles 2010–2012 and 2014–2016 supplemented by five-year US American Community Survey. Drugs: cigarettes, alcohol abuse, last-month cannabis use and last-year cocaine use. MH: any mental illness, major depressive illness, serious mental illness and suicidal thinking. Data analysis: two-stage, geotemporospatial, robust generalized linear regression and causal inference methods in R. Results 410,138 NSDUH respondents. Average response rate 76.7%. When drug and sociodemographic variables were combined in geospatial models significant terms including tobacco, alcohol, cannabis exposure and various ethnicities remained in final models for all four major mental health outcomes. Interactive terms including cannabis were related to any mental illness (β-estimate = 1.97 (95%C.I. 1.56–2.37), P <  2.2 × 10− 16), major depressive episode (β-estimate = 2.03 (1.54–2.52), P = 3.6 × 10− 16), serious mental illness (SMI, β-estimate = 2.04 (1.48–2.60), P = 1.0 × 10− 12), suicidal ideation (β-estimate = 1.99 (1.52–2.47), P <  2.2 × 10− 16) and in each case cannabis alone was significantly associated (from β-estimate = − 3.43 (− 4.46 − −2.42), P = 3.4 × 10− 11) with adverse MH outcomes on complex interactive regression surfaces. Geospatial modelling showed a monotonic upward trajectory of SMI which doubled (3.62 to 7.06%) as cannabis use increased. Extrapolated to whole populations cannabis decriminalization (4.26%, (4.18, 4.34%)), Prevalence Ratio (PR) = 1.035(1.034–1.036), attributable fraction in the exposed (AFE) = 3.28%(3.18–3.37%), P < 10− 300) and legalization (4.75% (4.65, 4.84%), PR = 1.155 (1.153–1.158), AFE = 12.91% (12.72–13.10%), P < 10− 300) were associated with increased SMI vs. illegal status (4.26, (4.18–4.33%)). Conclusions Data show all four indices of mental ill-health track cannabis exposure across space and time and are robust to multivariable adjustment for ethnicity, socioeconomics and other drug use. MH deteriorated with cannabis legalization. Cannabis use-MH data are consistent with causal relationships in the forward direction and include dose-response and temporal-sequential relationships. Together with similar international reports and numerous mechanistic studies preventative action to reduce cannabis use is indicated.


2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa J. Colpe ◽  
Joan F. Epstein ◽  
Peggy R. Barker ◽  
Joseph C. Gfroerer

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen M. Janssen ◽  
Emma E. McGinty ◽  
Susan T. Azrin ◽  
Denise Juliano-Bult ◽  
Gail L. Daumit

2002 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip S. Wang ◽  
Olga Demler ◽  
Ronald C. Kessler

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 185-201
Author(s):  
John V. Jacobi

Mental illness affects the health status of about one in five Americans each year. More than five percent of adult Americans have a “serious” mental illness—an illness that interferes with social functioning. About two and one-half percent have “severe and persistent” mental illness, a categorization for the most disabling forms of mental illness, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. All mental illness interferes to some degree with social activities. Left untreated, serious mental illness can be disabling—disrupting family life, employment status and the ability to maintain housing. Nevertheless, privately insured people in the United States (that is, the majority of insured people in the United States) are not covered for mental health services to the same extent that they are covered for physical health services. Second-class coverage of mental health services reduces access to care for people with mental illness because cost becomes a significant barrier to service. The resulting lack of treatment fuels the disabling potential of mental illness.


2014 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 406-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma E. McGinty ◽  
Daniel W. Webster ◽  
Marian Jarlenski ◽  
Colleen L. Barry

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document