Does NAFLD Mediate the Relationship Between Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Risk? Evidence from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

Author(s):  
Luis A. Rodriguez ◽  
Alka M. Kanaya ◽  
Stephen C. Shiboski ◽  
Alicia Fernandez ◽  
David Herrington ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. e57
Author(s):  
Efi Koloverou ◽  
Demosthenes Panagiotakos ◽  
Christos Pitsavos ◽  
Ekavi Georgousopoulou ◽  
Christina Chrysohoou ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 1105-1112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nele Huys ◽  
Vicky Van Stappen ◽  
Samyah Shadid ◽  
Marieke De Craemer ◽  
Odysseas Androutsos ◽  
...  

Background: This study aimed to investigate whether the relationship between psychosocial and perceived environmental factors and physical activity (PA) in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes is influenced by educational level. Methods: Based on the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score questionnaire, this study selected 164 adults (Mage: 38 (5.34) y, 13.4% men) at type 2 diabetes risk from 11 low socioeconomic neighborhoods in Flanders (Belgium). Participants filled out questionnaires on psychosocial and perceived environmental factors and wore an ActiGraph accelerometer for 5 consecutive days. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of covariance in SPSS. Results: Educational level significantly influenced the association between perception of body weight and light PA (P = .01) and total PA (P = .03) on weekend days. Educational level did not influence the associations between other psychosocial and perceived environmental factors (ie, perceived social influence; environmental, time and attitudinal barriers, perceived self-efficacy; knowledge and fatalism) and PA. Conclusions: Educational level did not influence the relationship between most psychosocial and perceived environmental factors and PA in this sample of adults at type 2 diabetes risk. This suggests that addressing different psychosocial and perceived environmental correlates in lower and higher educated participants might not be necessary. However, more research in this specific population is needed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noa Gang ◽  
Kyle Van Allen ◽  
Paul J. Villeneuve ◽  
Heather MacDonald ◽  
Jennifer E. Bruin

AbstractThe relationship between persistent organic pollutants (POPs), including dioxins and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (DL-PCBs), and diabetes incidence in adults has been extensively studied. However, significant variability exists in the reported associations both between and within studies. Emerging data from rodent studies suggest that dioxin exposure disrupts glucose homeostasis in a sex-specific manner. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of relevant epidemiological studies to investigate whether there are sex-specific associations between dioxin or DL-PCB exposure and type 2 diabetes incidence. Articles were organized into the following subcategories: data stratified by sex (16%), unstratified data (56%), and data from only 1 sex (16% male, 12% female). We also considered whether exposure occurred either abruptly at high levels through a contamination event (“disaster exposure”) or chronically at background levels (“non-disaster exposure”). Only 8 studies compared associations between dioxin/DL-PCB exposure and diabetes risk in males versus females within the same population. When all sex-stratified or single sex studies were considered in the meta-analysis, the summary odds ratio (OR) for increased diabetes risk was similar between females and males (1.78 and 1.95, respectively) when comparing exposed to reference populations, suggesting that this relationship is not sex-specific. However, when we considered disaster-exposed populations separately, the association differed substantially between sexes, with females showing a much higher OR than males (2.86 and 1.59, respectively). Moreover, the association between dioxin/DL-PCB exposure and diabetes was stronger for females than males in disaster-exposed populations. In contrast, both sexes had significantly increased ORs in non-disaster exposure populations and the OR for females was lower than males (1.40 and 2.02, respectively). Our review emphasizes the importance of considering sex differences, as well as the mode of pollutant exposure, when exploring the relationship between pollutant exposure and diabetes in epidemiological studies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 959-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn B. Wolff ◽  
Jennifer L. Gay ◽  
Mark G. Wilson ◽  
David M. DeJoy ◽  
Robert J. Vandenberg

Purpose: Examine the moderating role of perceived organizational and coworker support on the relationship between job stress and type 2 diabetes risk among employees. Design: A cross-sectional survey was administered to employees at the workplace. Setting: One national retail organization. Participants: Baseline data were obtained from 1595 employees in 21 retail stores. Measures: Self-reported organizational and coworker support to encourage and fulfill job responsibilities and job stress. Diabetes risk was calculated using age, gender, race/ethnicity, blood pressure, physical activity, weight status, and self-reported diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Analysis: Multilevel multiple regression was conducted to test the interaction effect of support on the association between job stress and diabetes risk. Results: Mean age was 37.95 years (±12.03) and body mass index was 26.72 (±4.95). Three percent of participants reported diagnosed diabetes. Organizational support was positively associated with coworker support. Both were negatively associated with job stress. Organizational support, but not coworker support, moderated the relationship of job stress with diabetes risk. Participants with greater perceived organizational support had lower diabetes risk scores compared to those with lower perceived organizational support. Conclusion: Organizational support may be a key factor for workplaces to reduce stress and diabetes risk. Further testing of organizations’ supportive role on employee health may be helpful in developing future workplace programs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 294-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumathi Venkatesh ◽  
Thomas Conner ◽  
Won O. Song ◽  
Beth H. Olson ◽  
Lorraine J. Weatherspoon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document