scholarly journals Health-related quality of life after chemotherapy with or without rituximab in primary central nervous system lymphoma patients: results from a randomised phase III study

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1046-1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. van der Meulen ◽  
K. Bakunina ◽  
M. Nijland ◽  
M.C. Minnema ◽  
G. Cull ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii13-iii14 ◽  
Author(s):  
M van der Meulen ◽  
L Dirven ◽  
K Bakunina ◽  
M J B Taphoorn ◽  
M J van den Bent ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Data on the impact of treatment with Rituximab on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients are scarce. To determine the net clinical benefit of a new treatment, analyzing the effect on HRQoL is warranted. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients from a phase III trial (HOVON 105/ ALLG NHL 24), randomized to standard chemotherapy with or without Rituximab, were asked to fill in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 questionnaires before and during treatment, and up to 2 years follow-up or progression. Five predetermined scales were selected for primary analyses: global health status (GH), role (RF) and social functioning (SF), fatigue (FA), and motor dysfunction (MD). A difference ≥10 points was defined as clinically relevant. Cross-sectional analyses were performed comparing changes in HRQoL scores from baseline between the two arms at 12 and 24 months after treatment. Effect of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was analyzed in irradiated patients only. Differences in HRQoL over time between the treatment arms, i.e. the primary outcome, were assessed using linear mixed models (LMM). RESULTS 175/199 patients completed at least one HRQoL questionnaire, and compliance was >60% at all evaluation points. Median age was 61 (IQR 55–66), 74% had a WHO performance score <2, and 38% received WBRT, similar to the total trial population. HRQoL scores on all five scales were significantly and to a clinically relevant extent improved at 12 and 24 months follow-up when compared to baseline in both arms (range: 11.6–42.4), except for FA and MD at 12 months (both -7.2). Differences in HRQoL changes from baseline to 12 and 24 months between the two arms were not statistically significant (range: 3.6–10.9). In the irradiated patients (n=52), HRQoL scores remained stable up to 24 months compared to shortly after WBRT for GH, SF, FA and MD (range -8.1 - 7.6). A clinically relevant and statically significant improvement was seen in RF for both arms at 12 and 24 months compared to ‘after WBRT’(range: +16.7 - +22.2). After correction for multiple testing, LMM analyses showed no statistically significant and clinically relevant differences between the arms for any of the scales over time (range: -3.8 to +4.0). CONCLUSION Treatment resulted in improved HRQoL, but the addition of Rituximab to standard chemotherapy did not further impact HRQoL over time. WBRT did not result in deterioration of HRQoL up to 2 years of follow-up.


2021 ◽  
pp. 026921552110184
Author(s):  
Rita Lenoir dit Caron ◽  
Jeremy Coquart ◽  
Maxime Gilliaux

Objective: Investigate the effect of yoga on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with central nervous system disorders. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on the PubMed-NCBI, EBSCO Host, Cochrane Library, Scopus and ScienceDirect databases until 05 April 2021. Only randomized control trials published in English or French were included and had to compare yoga to another intervention group or a control group. They also had to clearly measure HRQoL. Methodological quality was assessed with the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Results: Sixteen studies were found, including six for multiple sclerosis, five for Parkinson’s disease, two for stroke, one for dementia, one for epilepsy and one for brain tumour. Only 12 studies performed between-group statistics and 8 found a significant difference between groups after treatment. When yoga was compared to no intervention, the results were generally in favour of the yoga group, but when yoga was compared to another intervention programme, there was generally no significant difference between groups. There were many different HRQoL questionnaires, even within the same disease, which reduces the comparability of studies. Conclusions: With low to moderate quality of the evidence, yoga seems effective to improve HRQoL in people with Parkinson’s disease. For multiple sclerosis, stroke, dementia, epilepsy and brain tumour, the quality of the evidence is still insufficient to conclude of the effectiveness of yoga.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document