scholarly journals Peace corps partnering for health services implementation research: volunteer perspectives

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 349
Author(s):  
Angel N. Desai ◽  
Crystal Patil ◽  
Karen Peters ◽  
J. Andrew Dykens
Author(s):  
Ross C. Brownson ◽  
Graham A. Colditz ◽  
Enola K. Proctor

This chapter highlights just a sample of the many rich areas for dissemination and implementation research that will assist us in shortening the gap between discovery and practice, thus beginning to realize the benefits of research for patients, families, and communities. Greater emphasis on implementation in challenging settings, including lower and middle-income countries and underresourced communities in higher income countries will add to the lessons we must learn to fully reap the benefit of our advances in dissemination and implementation research methods. Moreover, collaboration and multidisciplinary approaches to dissemination and implementation research will help to make efforts more consistent and more effective moving forward. Thus, we will be better able to identify knowledge gaps that need to be addressed in future dissemination and implementation research, ultimately informing the practice and policies of clinical care and public health services.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Schloemer ◽  
P Schröder-Bäck

Abstract Background To improve the health of different populations, health systems need healthcare professionals who are able to innovate health services. In order to empower students from various healthcare professions to change health service practice in a sustainable way, a training was developed based on the PIET-T models of transferability (Schloemer & Schröder-Bäck, 2018). It was evaluated at three universities in Germany and the Netherlands. Objective The aims of the training were to enable students to: 1. Critically analyze existing evidence about successful and unsuccessful transfers of evidence-based interventions to specific “real-world” contexts (1 day), 2. Conduct an assessment of transferability with case studies using problem-based learning (1 day), 3. Practice implementation research in a healthcare organization (4 months, 4 hours/week). The training was evaluated through discussions, a written reflection and a questionnaire in order to understand students' learning experiences. Results Two bachelor programs for occupational, physical and speech therapists, and one master program for public health professionals took part from 09/2019 to 03/2020, including 66 students. Students valued the training as important, 73 % found it helpful for professional practice. They reflected various ideas how to use the PIET-T models for practice change. Although the implementation research process was perceived as high workload, students valued the experience of getting to know barriers and solutions in a practical setting. Conclusions The students of all programs value the practical relevance of teaching with profession-related specifications. Practical application of the PIET-T models opens up new approaches in teaching in order to educate knowledge on improvement of health services in different contexts. Key messages Empowering students to improve healthcare requires practical training. Training on transferability helps students develop skills for improvement of health services.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodie Shoobridge ◽  
Tim Schultz ◽  
Gill Harvey ◽  
Neil Kirby

PurposeThe study describes the implementation of a novel strategy, entitled the Action Learning Set Facilitation Model, to develop internal facilitation capability to lead change. The Model incorporated the Novice-Experienced-Expert pathway, a facilitation development approach underpinning the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services Implementation Framework, with action learning methodology.Design/methodology/approachA mixed-methods descriptive approach reports the results of 22 interviews, 182 Action Learning Sets and 159 post program survey data sets to explore facilitator experiences, strengths and potential application of the Model.FindingsAt program completion, five novice (of 174) and one experienced (of 27) facilitator transitioned to the next facilitation level. The three groups of facilitators described positive change in confidence and facilitation skill, and experience of action learning sets. Inconsistencies between self-report competence and observed practice amongst novices was reported. Novices had decreasing exposure to the Model due to factors related to ongoing organisational change. Internal facilitators were considered trusted and credible facilitators.Research limitations/implicationsThere are practical and resource implications in investing in internal facilitation capability, noting proposed and real benefits of similar development programs may be compromised during, or as a consequence of organisational change. Further research describing application of the facilitation model, strategies to enhance multisystemic support for programs and evaluation support are suggested.Practical implicationsThe Action Learning Set Facilitation Model offers promise in developing internal facilitation capability supporting change in organisations. Critical success factors include building broad scale internal capability, stable leadership and longitudinal support to embed practice.Originality/valueThis is the first application of the facilitation component of the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services implementation framework embedded to action learning sets as an implementation science strategy for leader development supporting organisational change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document