Self-efficacy for healthy eating and peer support for unhealthy eating are associated with adolescents’ food intake patterns

Appetite ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 48-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Fitzgerald ◽  
Caroline Heary ◽  
Colette Kelly ◽  
Elizabeth Nixon ◽  
Mark Shevlin
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Peer Support ◽  
Healthy Eating ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Unhealthy Eating ◽  
Food Intake Patterns

scholarly journals Food Availability, Motivational-Related Factors, and Food Consumption: A Path Model Study with Children

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (24) ◽  
pp. 12897
Author(s):  
Beatriz Pereira ◽  
Pedro Rosário ◽  
José Carlos Núñez ◽  
Daniela Rosendo ◽  
Cristina Roces ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Consumption ◽  
Healthy Eating ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Path Model ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Model Study ◽  
Unhealthy Eating

The promotion of children’s healthy eating is a key public health priority. However, children’s food consumption is a complex phenomenon with several contributing factors, and there is a call to continue developing comprehensive models with several variables acting simultaneously. The present study aimed to examine the role different motivational-related variables (e.g., self-regulation, self-efficacy) may play in children’s consumption of healthy and unhealthy foods. To address this goal, data were collected in a sample of 242 fifth and sixth graders with access to both healthy and unhealthy foods at home. A path model was conducted to analyze networks of relationships between motivational-related variables and children’s healthy and unhealthy eating. The gender variable was included as a covariate to control its effect. The data showed that self-regulation for healthy eating mediates the relationship between the predictor variables (i.e., knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy) and the type of food consumption (healthy and unhealthy). Current data contribute to understanding the complexity behind food consumption by providing a comprehensive model with motivational-related factors associated with both healthy and unhealthy eating. The present findings are likely to help inform the development of early preventive interventions focused on the promotion of healthy eating.

Are parents eating their greens? Fruit and vegetable consumption during a school intervention

2014 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 585-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Aschemann-Witzel ◽  
Tino Bech-Larsen ◽  
Alice Grønhøj
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Eating ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Vegetable Consumption ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
School Intervention ◽  
Fruit And Vegetable Consumption ◽  
Fruit And Vegetable ◽  
Positive Interaction ◽  
Content Type ◽  
School Based

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to study the extent of change in parents' fruit and vegetable consumption during a period when their children participate in a school-based healthy eating intervention. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 256 12-year-old Danish schoolchildren took part in a text-message feedback intervention promoting fruit and vegetable consumption. One parent of each child filled out self-administered questionnaires at three points during the 40-week study period. In the questionnaire, stated consumption, perceived influence factors on their consumption and self-efficacy and self-regulation were measured. Findings – Only half of the parents stated that they met the “five a day” target. These parents reported good availability of fruit and vegetables in their household, high consumption among their friends and frequent exercise and they were characterised by high self-efficacy levels. Stated consumption increased during the period of the intervention targeted at their children. Parents that reported an increase had, at the start of the intervention, reported low levels of consumption, lack of encouragement to eat healthy at their workplace and lower autonomous self-regulation. Research limitations/implications – The consumption data is limited to self-report. Practical implications – The results indicate that parents can be influenced indirectly by school-based interventions targeted at their children. Future interventions should include the family with the intent to support positive interaction that might further promote and sustain healthy eating habits. Originality/value – The study considers the possible effects school interventions targeting children may have on the immediate family, an aspect generally overlooked in school-based health initiatives.

scholarly journals Self-Efficacy for Healthy Eating Moderates the Impact of Stress on Diet Quality Among Family Child Care Home Providers

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-315
Author(s):  
Phillip Dobson ◽  
Regan Burney ◽  
Derek Hales ◽  
Amber Vaughn ◽  
Alison Tovar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Child Care ◽  
Healthy Eating ◽  
Diet Quality ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Family Child Care ◽  
The Impact

Food intake patterns of gastric bypass patients

1982 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 437-443
Author(s):  
E. KAYE BROWN ◽  
EVELYN A. SETTLE ◽  
ANDRE M. VAN RIJ
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Food Intake Patterns

Combining CGM and an Online Peer Support Community for Hispanic Adults with T2D: A Feasibility Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 193229682110322
Author(s):  
Michelle L. Litchman ◽  
Ashley Ng ◽  
Ana Sanchez-Birkhead ◽  
Nancy A. Allen ◽  
Bruno Rodriguez-Gonzales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peer Support ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Participant Satisfaction ◽  
Hispanic Community ◽  
Clinical Measures ◽  
Study Participants

Background: Previous research has identified that people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) within the Hispanic community would benefit from an online peer support community (OPSC) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data to facilitate diabetes self-management. Methods: A mixed-methods feasibility study enrolled Hispanic, Spanish-speaking adults with T2D, not on insulin. Participants were provided with CGM and access to an OPSC for 12 weeks. Feasibility was assessed by number of eligible participants who enrolled, attrition, quantity of CGM data, validated clinical measures of self-efficacy, quality of life and adverse events. Engagement in the OPSC was measured using objective metrics on the online platform. Qualitative interviews were conducted upon conclusion of the intervention to assess feasibility, acceptability, participant satisfaction, and key recommendations for improvement. Results: Of 46 participants screened, 39 were eligible and 26 completed the study. Participants significantly improved self-efficacy scores. Posts in the OPSC related to goal setting had the highest engagement followed by mid-week and end of week check-in posts respectively. Participant interviews described challenges accessing the OPSC platform as a barrier to engagement. Despite this, all participants were satisfied with the intervention. Key recommendations for improvement included providing greater variety of and individualized education and the use of a peer support platform that is easily accessible. Conclusions: The CGM + OPSC intervention tailored to the Hispanic community with T2D was feasible, acceptable and satisfactory and improved participant self-efficacy for diabetes management which may lead to improved clinical outcomes.

A prototype-targeting intervention for the promotion of healthy eating in adolescents

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 450-469
Author(s):  
Birte Dohnke ◽  
Tanja Dewitt ◽  
Amina Steinhilber
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Eating ◽  
Behavioural Change ◽  
Intervention Mapping ◽  
Intervention Development ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Process Characteristics ◽  
Unhealthy Eating ◽  
Data Assessment ◽  
Systematic Planning

Purpose Unhealthy eating among adolescents from families with lower social status is a major concern. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and evaluation of a prototype-targeting intervention for the promotion of healthy eating in this target group. Design/methodology/approach The planning model intervention mapping (IM) was chosen to proceed systematically, to use theory and evidence herein and to make decisions transparent. A controlled study with three times of data assessment was conducted to evaluate process characteristics and effects (N=108). Findings “Provide opportunities for social comparison” (behavioural change technique 6.2) was chosen as change method and “perceived similarity” was identified as the condition for its effectiveness. An intervention unit was designed for application. The evaluation results show the feasibility of the unit; materials and activities successfully applied the change method and its condition for effectiveness; and intervention objectives were generally achieved. Practical implications A prototype-targeting intervention is provided that is based on theory and evidence, and is suitable for implementation. More generally, the paper can serve as a blueprint for the systematic planning of theory- and evidence-based interventions targeting specific personal determinants for behaviour change. Originality/value The paper makes an important contribution to the application of the prototype-related theory and a useful addition of IM to the growing field of intervention development and design.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of one-to-one peer support for patients with severe mental illness – a randomised controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 103-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.I. Mahlke ◽  
S. Priebe ◽  
K. Heumann ◽  
A. Daubmann ◽  
K. Wegscheider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Peer Support ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
One To One ◽  
Randomised Controlled

AbstractBackgroundOne-to-one peer support is a resource-oriented approach for patients with severe mental illness. Existing trials provided inconsistent results and commonly have methodological shortcomings, such as poor training and role definition of peer supporters, small sample sizes, and lack of blinded outcome assessments.MethodsThis is a randomised controlled trial comparing one-to-one peer support with treatment as usual. Eligible were patients with severe mental illnesses: psychosis, major depression, bipolar disorder or borderline personality disorder of more than two years’ duration. A total of 216 patients were recruited through in- and out-patient services from four hospitals in Hamburg, Germany, with 114 allocated to the intervention group and 102 to the control group. The intervention was one-to-one peer support, delivered by trained peers and according to a defined role specification, in addition to treatment as usual over the course of six months, as compared to treatment as usual alone. Primary outcome was self-efficacy measured on the General Self-Efficacy Scale at six-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, social functioning, and hospitalisations.ResultsPatients in the intervention group had significantly higher scores of self-efficacy at the six-month follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences on secondary outcomes in the intention to treat analyses.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that one-to-one peer support delivered by trained peer supporters can improve self-efficacy of patients with severe mental disorders over a one-year period. One-to-one peer support may be regarded as an effective intervention. Future research should explore the impact of improved self-efficacy on clinical and social outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document