Emission sources sensitivity study for ground-level ozone and PM2.5 due to oil sands development using air quality modeling system: Part I- model evaluation for current year base case simulation

2012 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 533-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunny Cho ◽  
Preston McEachern ◽  
Ralph Morris ◽  
Tejas Shah ◽  
Jeremiah Johnson ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junlei Zhan ◽  
Yongchun Liu ◽  
Wei Ma ◽  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Xuezhong Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract. The formation of ground-level ozone (O3) is dependent on both atmospheric chemical processes and meteorological factors. Traditional models have difficulty assessing O3 formation sensitivity in a timely manner due to the limitations of flexibility and computational efficiency. In this study, a random forest (RF) model coupled with the reactivity of volatile organic compound (VOC) species was used to investigate the O3 formation sensitivity in Beijing from 2014 to 2016, and evaluate the relative importance (RI) of chemical and meteorological factors to O3 formation. The results showed that the O3 prediction performance using initial concentrations of VOC species (R2 = 0.87) was better than that using total VOCs (TVOCs) concentrations (R2 = 0.77). Meanwhile, the RIs of VOC species correlated well with their O3 formation potentials (OFPs). O3 formation presented a negative response to NOx, PM2.5 and relative humidity, and a positive response to temperature, solar radiation and VOCs. The O3 isopleth curves calculated by the RF model were generally comparable with those calculated by the box model. O3 formation shifted from a VOC-limited regime to a transition regime from 2014 to 2016. This study demonstrates that the RF model coupled with the initial concentrations of VOC species could provide an accurate, flexible, and computationally efficient approach for O3 sensitivity analysis.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariano Mertens ◽  
Astrid Kerkweg ◽  
Volker Grewe ◽  
Patrick Jöckel ◽  
Robert Sausen

Abstract. Anthropogenic and natural emissions influence the tropospheric ozone budget, thereby affecting air-quality and climate. To study the influence of different emission sources on the ozone budget, often source apportionment studies with a tagged tracer approach are performed. Studies investigating air quality issues usually rely on regional models with a high spatial resolution, while studies focusing on climate related questions often use coarsely resolved global models. It is well known that simulated ozone concentrations depend on the resolution of the model and the resolution of the emission inventory. Whether the contributions simulated by source apportionment approaches also depend on the model resolution, however, is still unclear. Therefore, this study is a first attempt to analyse the impact of the model, the model resolution, and the emission inventory resolution on simulated ozone contributions diagnosed with a tagging method. The differences of the ozone contributions caused by these factors are compared with differences which arise due to different emission inventories. To do so we apply the MECO(n) model system which on-line couples a global chemistry-climate model with a regional chemistry-climate model equipped with a tagging scheme for source apportionment. The results of the global model (300 km resolution) are compared with the results of the regional model at 50 km (Europe) and 12 km (Germany) resolution. Averaged over Europe the simulated contributions of land transport emissions to ground-level ozone differ by 10 % at maximum. For other anthropogenic emission sources the differences are in the same order of magnitude, while the contribution of stratospheric ozone to ground level ozone differs by up to 30 % on average. This suggests that ozone contributions of anthropogenic emission sources averaged on continental scale are rather robust with respect to different models, model and emission inventory resolutions. On regional scale, however, we quantified differences of the contribution of land transport emissions to ozone of up to 20 %. Depending on the region the largest differences are either caused by inter model differences, or differences of the anthropogenic emission inventories. Clearly, the results strongly depend on the compared models and emission inventories and cannot necessarily be generalised, however we show how the inclusion of source apportionment methods can help in analysing inter-model differences.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 5567-5588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariano Mertens ◽  
Volker Grewe ◽  
Vanessa S. Rieger ◽  
Patrick Jöckel

Abstract. We quantify the contribution of land transport and shipping emissions to tropospheric ozone for the first time with a chemistry–climate model including an advanced tagging method (also known as source apportionment), which considers not only the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx, NO, and NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and volatile organic compounds (VOC) separately, but also their non-linear interaction in producing ozone. For summer conditions a contribution of land transport emissions to ground-level ozone of up to 18 % in North America and Southern Europe is estimated, which corresponds to 12 and 10 nmol mol−1, respectively. The simulation results indicate a contribution of shipping emissions to ground-level ozone during summer on the order of up to 30 % in the North Pacific Ocean (up to 12 nmol mol−1) and 20 % in the North Atlantic Ocean (12 nmol mol−1). With respect to the contribution to the tropospheric ozone burden, we quantified values of 8 and 6 % for land transport and shipping emissions, respectively. Overall, the emissions from land transport contribute around 20 % to the net ozone production near the source regions, while shipping emissions contribute up to 52 % to the net ozone production in the North Pacific Ocean. To put these estimates in the context of literature values, we review previous studies. Most of them used the perturbation approach, in which the results for two simulations, one with all emissions and one with changed emissions for the source of interest, are compared. For a better comparability with these studies, we also performed additional perturbation simulations, which allow for a consistent comparison of results using the perturbation and the tagging approach. The comparison shows that the results strongly depend on the chosen methodology (tagging or perturbation approach) and on the strength of the perturbation. A more in-depth analysis for the land transport emissions reveals that the two approaches give different results, particularly in regions with large emissions (up to a factor of 4 for Europe). Our estimates of the ozone radiative forcing due to land transport and shipping emissions are, based on the tagging method, 92 and 62 mW m−2, respectively. Compared to our best estimates, previously reported values using the perturbation approach are almost a factor of 2 lower, while previous estimates using NOx-only tagging are almost a factor of 2 larger. Overall our results highlight the importance of differentiating between the perturbation and the tagging approach, as they answer two different questions. In line with previous studies, we argue that only the tagging approach (or source apportionment approaches in general) can estimate the contribution of emissions, which is important to attribute emission sources to climate change and/or extreme ozone events. The perturbation approach, however, is important to investigate the effect of an emission change. To effectively assess mitigation options, both approaches should be combined. This combination allows us to track changes in the ozone production efficiency of emissions from sources which are not mitigated and shows how the ozone share caused by these unmitigated emission sources subsequently increases.


2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-59
Author(s):  
A.V. Shavrina ◽  
◽  
I.A. Mikulskaya ◽  
S.I. Kiforenko ◽  
V.A. Sheminova ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 824-829
Author(s):  
Cornel Ianache ◽  
Laurentiu Predescu ◽  
Mirela Predescu ◽  
Dumitru Dumitru

The serious air pollution problem has determined public concerns, worldwide. One of the main challenges for countries all over the world is caused by the elevated levels of ground-level ozone (O3) concentrations and its anthropogenic precursors. Ploiesti city, as one of the major urban area of Romania, is facing the same situation. This research aims to investigate spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of O3 in relationship with nitrogen oxides (NOx) using statistical analysis methods. Hourly O3 and NOx measurements were collected during 2014 year in Ploiesti. The results obtained showed that the ozone spatial distribution was non-normal for each month in 2014. The diurnal cycle of ground-level ozone concentrations showed a mid-day peak, while NOx diurnal variations presented 2 daily peaks, one in the morning (7:00 a.m.) and one in the afternoon (between 5:00 and 7:00 p.m.). In addition, it was observed a distinct pattern of weekly variations for O3 and NOx. Like in many other urban areas, the results indicated the presence of the �ozone weekend effect� in Ploiesti during the 2014 year, ozone concentrations being slightly higher on weekends compared to weekdays. For the same monitoring site, the nitrogen oxides were less prevalent on Saturdays and Sundays, probably due to reducing of road traffic and other pollution-generating activities on weekends than during the week.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document